English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 109952/140887 (78%)
Visitors : 46363042      Online Users : 1246
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    政大機構典藏 > 理學院 > 心理學系 > 學位論文 >  Item 140.119/68264
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/68264


    Title: 組織中的建言行為:員工目標導向與主管建言行為之探討
    The Voice Behavior in Organization: The Study of Employee’s Goal Orientation and Supervisor’s Voice Behavior
    Authors: 張宣苹
    Contributors: 郭建志
    張宣苹
    Keywords: 目標導向
    挑戰型建言
    支持型建言
    主管建言行為
    組織導向自尊
    goal orientation
    challenge voice
    supportive voice
    supervisor’s voice behavior
    organizational based self-esteem
    Date: 2013
    Issue Date: 2014-08-06 11:46:40 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 在現今高度競爭的商業環境,員工建言行為的展現對於組織而言日顯重要。過往許多文獻即顯示員工建言行為對於組織有許多益處,包含增進組織決策品質、組織創新與提升團體績效表現。為了全面性瞭解組織中的建言行為,本研究目的為四:(1)了解不同目標導向員工對於建言行為之影響、(2)從主管、同儕與個體本身之角度,了解建言行為對個體之影響、(3)探討建言行為在不同目標導向與結果間所扮演之中介角色,以及(4)探討主管建言行為對員工建言行為之影響。
    本研究採對偶的問卷調查,共蒐集157位主管與242位部屬資料,並透過階層迴歸進行資料分析。研究結果顯示:(1)證明目標導向及逃避目標導向皆與挑戰型建言及支持型建言有顯著正向關係、(2)挑戰型建言與支持型建言分別在證明目標導向與組織導向自尊具有部分中介效果、然而兩種建言對於目標導向與主管評價及目標導向與知覺職場排擠皆無中介效果,以及(3)主管建言行為對於目標導向與建言行為間並無調節效果。
    根據研究結果,本研究證實目標導向與建言行為之間的關係,以及建言行為對證明目標導向與組織導向自尊的中介效果。最後,研究者進一步提出本研究之理論貢獻、管理實務意涵、研究限制與未來研究方向,以供業界及組織行為領域之學者參考。
    In today’s hypercompetitive business environment, employees’ voice behavior has become even more important to organizations. Many references also showed that employees’ voice behavior can bring benefits to organizations, such as improved organizational decision quality, innovation, and enhancing team performance. To build toward a comprehensive understanding of voice behavior in organizations, the purpose of this research are as follows: (1) to demonstrate how different goal orientations predict employees’ voice behavior, (2) to explore the results of employees’ voice behavior from the perspectives of the supervisor, co-worker, and individual,
    (3) to demonstrate the mediator role between different goal orientation and outcome variables, and (4) to demonstrate the influence of supervisors’ voice behavior on employees’ voice behavior.
    With data collected from 157 supervisors and 242 employees to examine the hypothesized relationships, the present study also utilizes the dyad approach. The results showed that (1) both prove goal orientation and avoid goal orientation are positively related to challenge voice and supportive voice, (2) both challenge voice and supportive voice mediated prove goal orientation and organizational based self-esteem respectively, but didn’t play mediators role neither on goal orientation and employee’s performance from supervisor’s view nor on goal orientation and workplace ostracism, and (3) supervisors’ voice behavior has no moderating effect on goal orientation and employee’s voice behavior.
    In conclusion, the present study showed that goal orientation have the influence on voice behavior, and both challenge voice and supportive voice mediated prove goal orientation and organizational based self-esteem respectively. Finally, theoretical implications, practical implications, limitations and future directions are discussed for managers’ and researchers’ reference.
    Reference: 一. 中文文獻
    司馬光(1084)。資治通鑑 (Vol. 37):修道館。
    洪贊凱與曾鈺雯(2012)。從印象管理觀點探討組織個體政治技巧與建言行為之關係。人力資源管理學報, 12(2),1-23。
    莊如松(2007)。適應性績效量表之發展及其與目標導向、前瞻人格之關係(未出版之博士論文)。國立政治大學企業管理學系,台北市。

    二. 英文文獻
    Andersson, L. M., & Pearson, C. M. (1999). Tit for tat? The spiraling effect of incivility in the workplace. Academy of Management Review, 24(3), 452-471.
    Athanassiades, J. C. (1973). The distortion of upward communication in hierarchical organizations. The Academy of Management Journal, 16(2), 207-226.
    Bandura, A., & McClelland, D. C. (1977). Social learning theory. General Learning Press.
    Barrick, M. R., & Mount, M. K. (1991). The big five personality dimensions and job performance: a meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 44(1), 1-26.
    Burris, E. R. (2012). The risks and rewards of speaking up: managerial responses to employee voice. Academy of Management Journal, 55(4), 851-875.
    Button, S. B., Mathieu, J. E., & Zajac, D. M. (1996). Goal orientation in organizational research: a conceptual and empirical foundation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 67(1), 26-48.
    Chattopadhyay, P. (2003). Can dissimilarity lead to positive outcomes? The influence of open versus closed minds. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 24(3), 295-312.
    Detert, J. R., & Burris, E. R. (2007). Leadership behavior and employee voice: is the door really open? Academy of Management Journal, 50(4), 869-884.
    Dineen, B. R., Lewicki, R. J., & Tomlinson, E. C. (2006). Supervisory guidance and behavioral integrity: relationships with employee citizenship and deviant behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(3), 622-635.
    Dooley, R. S., & Fryxell, G. E. (1999). Attaining decision quality and commitment from dissent: the moderating effects of loyalty and competence in strategic decision-making teams. The Academy of Management Journal, 42(4), 389-402.
    Dutton, J. E., Ashford, S. J., O`Neill, R. M., Hayes, E., & Wierba, E. E. (1997). Reading the wind: how middle managers assess the context for selling issues to top managers. Strategic Management Journal, 18(5), 407-423.
    Dweck, C. S. (1986). Motivational processes affecting learning. American Psychologist, 41(10), 1040-1048.
    Dweck, C. S., & Leggett, E. L. (1988). A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality. Psychological Review, 95(2), 256-273.
    Edmondson, A. (1999). Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(2), 350-383.
    Elliot, A. J., & Church, M. A. (1997). A hierarchical model of approach and avoidance achievement motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72(1), 218-232.
    Elliot, A. J., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (1994). Goal setting, achievement orientation, and intrinsic motivation: a mediational analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66(5), 968-980.
    Elliot, A. J., & Sheldon, K. M. (1997). Avoidance achievement motivation: a personal goals analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73(1), 171-185.
    Ferris, D. L., Brown, D. J., Berry, J. W., & Lian, H. (2008). The development and validation of the workplace ostracism scale. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(6), 1348.
    Fuller, J. B., Barnett, T., Hester, K., Relyea, C., & Frey, L. (2007). An exploratory examination of voice behavior from an impression management perspective. Journal of Managerial Issues, 19(1), 134-151.
    Gallucci, M., & Perugini, M. (2000). An experimental test of a game-theoretical model of reciprocity. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 13(4), 367-389.
    Glauser, M. J. (1984). Upward information flow in organizations: review and conceptual analysis. Human Relations, 37(8), 613-643.
    Hirschman, A. O. (1970). Exit, voice, and loyalty: responses to decline in firms, organizations, and states (Vol. 25): Harvard university press.
    Hirst, G., Van Knippenberg, D., Chin-Hui, C., & Sacramento, C. A. (2011). How does bureaucracy impact individual creativity? A cross-level investigation of team contextual influences on goal orientation-creativity relationships. Academy of Management Journal, 54(3), 624-641.
    Jaewon, L. (2003). An analysis of the antecedents of organization-based self-esteem in two korean banks. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 14(6), 1046-1066.
    Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (1989). Lisrel 7: A Guide to the Program and Applications. Chicago: SPSS Inc.
    Korman, A. K. (1976). Hypothesis of work behavior revisited and an extension. Academy of Management Review, 1(1), 50-63.
    Kristof, A. L. (1996). Person-organization fit: an integrative review of its conceptualizations, measurement, and implications. Personnel Psychology, 49(1), 1-49.
    LePine, J. A., & Van Dyne, L. (1998). Predicting voice behavior in work groups. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83(6), 853-868.
    Leung, A. S. M., Wu, L. Z., Chen, Y. Y., & Young, M. N. (2011). The impact of workplace ostracism in service organizations. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 30(4), 836-844.
    Liang, J., C. Farh, C. I., & Farh, J.-L. (2012). Psychological antecedents of promotive and prohibitive voice: a two-wave examination. Academy of Management Journal, 55(1), 71-73.
    Liu, W., Zhu, R., & Yang, Y. (2010). I warn you because i like you: voice behavior, employee identifications, and transformational leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 21(1), 189-202.
    Matthiesen, S. B., & Einarsen, S. (2007). Perpetrators and targets of bullying at work: role stress and individual differences. Violence and victims, 22(6), 735-753.
    Miceli, M. P. (1992). Blowing the whistle: the organizational and legal implications for companies and employees: Lexington Books.
    Mischel, W. 1977. The interaction of person and situation.In D. Magnusson & N. S. Endler (Eds.), Personality at the crossroads: Current issues in interactional psychology: 333–352. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
    Morrison, E. W. (2011). Employee voice behavior: integration and directions for future research. Academy of Management Annals, 5(1), 373-412.
    Morrison, E. W., & Milliken, F. J. (2000). Organizational silence: a barrier to change and development in a pluralistic world. Academy of Management Review, 25(4), 706-725.
    Morrison, E. W., Wheeler-Smith, S. L., & Kamdar, D. (2011). Speaking up in groups: a cross-level study of group voice climate and voice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(1), 183-191.
    Nemeth, C. J. (1997). Managing innovation: when less is more. California Management Review, 40(1), 59-74.
    O`Leary-Kelly, A. M., Griffin, R. W., & Glew, D. J. (1996). Organization-motivated aggression: a research framework. The Academy of Management Review, 21(1), 225-253.
    Organ, D. W., Podsakoff, P. M., & MacKenzie, S. B. (2006). Organizational citizenship behavior: its nature, antecedents, and consequences: Sage.
    Pierce, J. L., & Gardner, D. G. (2004). Self-esteem within the work and organizational context: a review of the organization-based self-esteem literature. Journal of Management, 30(5), 591-622.
    Pierce, J. L., Gardner, D. G., Cummings, L. L., & Dunham, R. B. (1989). Organization-based self-esteem: construct definition, measurement, and validation. Academy of Management Journal, 32(3), 622-648.
    Ragins, B. R., Cotton, J. L., & Miller, J. S. (2000). Marginal mentoring: the effects of type of mentor, quality of relationship, and program design on work and career attitudes. Academy of Management Journal, 43(6), 1177-1194.
    Robinson, S. L., O’Reilly, J., & Wang, W. (2013). Invisible at work an integrated model of workplace ostracism. Journal of Management, 39(1), 203-231.
    Savitsky, K., Gilovich, T., Berger, G., & Medvec, V. H. (2003). Is our absence as conspicuous as we think? Overestimating the salience and impact of one’s absence from a group. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39(4), 386-392.
    Scott, K. L., Restubog, S. L. D., & Zagenczyk, T. J. (2013). A social exchange-based model of the antecedents of workplace exclusion. Journal of Applied Psychology, 98(1), 37-48.
    Scott, S. G., & Bruce, R. A. (1994). Determinants of innovative behavior: a path model of individual innovation in the workplace. Academy of Management Journal, 37(3), 580-607.
    Sedikides, C., & Gregg, A. P. (2008). Self-enhancement: food for thought. Perspectives on psychological science Wiley-Blackwell, 3(2), 102-116.
    Seibert, S. E., Kraimer, M. L., & Crant, J. M. (2001). What do proactive people do? A longitudinal model linking proactive personality and career success. Personnel Psychology, 54(4), 845-874.
    Seijts, G. H., Latham, G. P., Tasa, K., & Brandon, W. L. (2004). Goal setting and goal orientation: an integration of two different yet related literatures. The Academy of Management Journal, 47(2), 227-239.
    Tangirala, S., & Ramanujam, R. (2008). Exploring nonlinearity in employee voice: the effects of personal control and organizational identification. Academy of Management Journal, 51(6), 1189-1203.
    Tett, R. P., & Burnett, D. D. (2003). A personality trait-based interactionist model of job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(3), 500-517.
    Thompson, J. A. (2005). Proactive personality and job performance: a social capital perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(5), 1011-1017.
    Van Dyne, L., & LePine, J. A. (1998). Helping and voice extra-role behaviors: evidence of construct and predictive validity. Academy of Management Journal, 41(1), 108-119.
    Van Dyne, L., Soon, A., & Botero, I. C. (2003). Conceptualizing employee silence and employee voice as multidimensional constructs. Journal of Management Studies, 40(6), 1359-1392.
    VandeWalle, D. (1997). Development and validation of a work domain goal orientation instrument. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 57(6), 995-1015.
    VandeWalle, D., & Cummings, L. L. (1997). A test of the influence of goal orientation on the feedback-seeking process. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82(3), 390-400.
    Venkataramani, V., & Tangirala, S. (2010). When and why do central employees speak up? An examination of mediating and moderating variables. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(3), 582-591.
    Walumbwa, F. O., & Schaubroeck, J. (2009). Leader personality traits and employee voice behavior: mediating roles of ethical leadership and work group psychological safety. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(5), 1275-1286.
    Whiting, S. W., Maynes, T. D., Podsakoff, N. P., & Podsakoff, P. M. (2012). Effects of message, source, and context on evaluations of employee voice behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97(1), 159-182.
    Whiting, S. W., Podsakoff, P. M., & Pierce, J. R. (2008). Effects of task performance, helping, voice, and organizational loyalty on performance appraisal ratings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(1), 125-139.
    Williams, L. J., & Anderson, S. E. (1994). An alternative approach to method effects by using latent-variable models: Applications in organizational behavior research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79(3), 323.
    Williams, K. D. (2002). Ostracism: the power of silence: Guilford Press.
    Zhou, J., & Ceorge, J. M. (2001). When job dissatisfaction leads to creativity: encouraging the expression of voice. Academy of Management Journal, 44: 682-696.
    Zhou, L., Wang, M., Chen, G., & Shi, J. (2012). Supervisors` upward exchange relationships and subordinate outcomes: testing the multilevel mediation role of empowerment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97(3), 668-680.
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    心理學研究所
    101752002
    102
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0101752002
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[心理學系] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    200201.pdf1469KbAdobe PDF2194View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback