English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Items with full text/Total items : 87956/117187 (75%)
Visitors : 23347005      Online Users : 141
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    政大機構典藏 > 文學院 > 哲學系 > 期刊論文 >  Item 140.119/69789
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/69789


    Title: 揭開韓非的際遇思想:兼與馬基維利比較
    Other Titles: Discovering Fortune or Circumstances in Han Fei's Philosophy: Compared with Machiavelli
    Authors: Kang Chan
    詹康
    Contributors: 哲學系
    Keywords: 韓非;自然之勢;馬基維利;命運;
    Han Fei;natural authority;Niccoloò Machiavelli;fortune;virtue
    Date: 2002.09
    Issue Date: 2014-09-11 11:18:20 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 韓非與馬基維利(Niccolò Machiavelli)經常相提並論,本文提出際遇的概念做為比較兩人的新途徑。馬基維利稱際遇為「命」,韓非未對際遇提出普遍化的理論,但有「自然之勢」一詞,代表超越人為安排的環境力量,限定國家治亂的趨向。此外,他對治亂之資、君臣遇合的討論,也應屬於際遇的範疇。韓非與馬基維利均認為,個人的「德」是應付際遇的根本,不過韓非主張君主勞須堅守客觀的法度,不像馬基維利提倡彈性,遊走於善惡兩邊。韓非從性格上將君主分為嚴厲和懦弱的兩型,與馬基維利的相通處很高。然而,韓非將君臣遇合當做最嚴重的問題來研究,加深了君主的危機感和孤寂感。在韓非思想中重新安立際遇概念的位置後,將會改變我們對韓非的理解。我們以往以為他主張政治萬能,以及實力決定一切,而依本文的研究,應加上際遇的不可知性。人固需努力作為,但環境的助力和阻力也是普遍存在的。
    Fortune, understood as circumstances in which men found themselves while the future is yet to be written, is a key to form a parallel between Han Fei and Niccolò Machiavelli, two philosophers who have often been associated and compared. Han Fei's idea of fortune partly expresses itself through the notion of ”natural authority,” referring to the congregation of all contingencies that might fundamentally affect a country beyond human influences. In addition, his discussions on the capitals of well-orderedness and disorder, and on prince-minister relations, also belong to the category of fortune.While the two philosophers apparently agree that ”virtue” is the power to cope with all circumstances, Han Fei also attributes worldly successes to the objectivity of laws and decrees, unlike Machiavelli who advocates the flexibility of crossing the line of good and evil. Han Fei's typology of imperfect princes-including the harsh punishing type and the benevolent rewarding type-is similar to Machiavelli's typology of men of action. However, Han Fei's concentration on prince-minister relations is distinctive in rendering the prince isolated and trusting no one.Putting fortune back in Han Fei's philosophy would rescue us from the dominant understanding that he believes in the omnipotence of political actions and the superiority of physical force. For him, fortune is always present; its aid and impediment to human action cannot be dismissed.
    Relation: 政治與社會哲學評論, 2 , 85-122
    Data Type: article
    Appears in Collections:[哲學系] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    index.html0KbHTML499View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback