政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/70465
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  全文笔数/总笔数 : 94487/125002 (76%)
造访人次 : 29713452      在线人数 : 446
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜寻范围 查询小技巧:
  • 您可在西文检索词汇前后加上"双引号",以获取较精准的检索结果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜寻,建议至进阶搜寻限定作者字段,可获得较完整数据
  • 进阶搜寻
    政大機構典藏 > 法學院 > 法律學系 > 期刊論文 >  Item 140.119/70465


    请使用永久网址来引用或连结此文件: http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/70465


    题名: 契約結果導向的司法控制——初探民事裁判結果導向案例
    其它题名: The Consequentialist Approach to the Regulation of Contracts: A Preliminary Study on Court Decisions
    作者: 許政賢
    Hsu, Cheng-Hsien
    贡献者: 法律系
    关键词: 結果導向;結果取向;司法控制;契約自由;契約正義;典範;釋義理論;法學方法;法官造法;法律經濟分析
    Consequentialism;Consequentialist approach;Consequentialist arguments;Freedom of contract;Justice of contract;Paradigm;Doctrine;Legal method;Judge-made law;Economic analysis of law
    日期: 2013-12
    上传时间: 2014-10-06 17:12:27 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 在契約法的發展過程中,調和契約自由與契約正義的緊張關係,或契約自由的範圍及內容控管的界限,殆屬最具爭議問題之一。雖然藉由法院裁判以形成司法控制,早已成為廣泛承認的事實,但在方法論上,如何建構更切合現實的模型,而更能發揮引導實務運作的功能,乃成為當代契約法的重大挑戰之一。本文藉由實務案例的觀察,認為考量結果早已是法院裁判的實然,而就契約的司法控制而言,本文主張結果導向方法的引進,將為契約法的適用過程注入新元素。同時,為使理論建構得以切合詮釋實務運作的功能,本文初步嘗試針對我國民事裁判,發掘其中可能涉及結果導向方法的相關案例,並試圖藉由所提理論架構的分析,建立基本類型及解析運作模式,以供未來理論分析及實務運作的參考。
    The problems regarding the conciliation of the tensions between the freedom and justice of contracts, or the judicial review of contracts from the aspect of contemporary development, can be evaluated as one of the most controversial disputes in modern contract law. Taking into account the fact that the judicial review of contracts has been recognized comprehensively not only in the Anglo-American but also in the European-Continental legal system, the development of a pragmatic mechanism in methodology, which the court may apply in dealing with the cases concerning the judicial review of contracts, seems to have a highly significant value. It is argued in this article that consequentialist arguments in broad meaning are widely accepted in judicial argumentation. On the other hand, the vague definition and inaccurate scope of this method has led to a relatively obscure phenomenon of the application of legal method. In order to establish a set of pragmatic methodological rules and principles, this article attempts to introduce a framework of consequentialist arguments in a narrow sense, by which the cases in practice would be analyzed and evaluated. It is the hope of the author that this framework could contribute to the explanation of the realistic process of decision making in court, and also to the establishment of a guideline for judges who are struggling for a better resolution in hard cases.
    關聯: 法學評論 , 135 , 87-173
    数据类型: article
    显示于类别:[法律學系] 期刊論文

    文件中的档案:

    档案 描述 大小格式浏览次数
    87-173.pdf1414KbAdobe PDF547检视/开启


    在政大典藏中所有的数据项都受到原著作权保护.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回馈