English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 112721/143689 (78%)
Visitors : 49535459      Online Users : 867
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    政大機構典藏 > 商學院 > 企業管理學系 > 學位論文 >  Item 140.119/79188
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/79188


    Title: 精品品牌與藝術注入產品設計對知覺價值之影響—知覺獨特之中介效果分析
    The impact of luxury brand and art infusion to product design on derceived value with the mediation effect of perceived uniqueness
    Authors: 黃怡嘉
    Huang, Yi Jia
    Contributors: 樓永堅
    黃怡嘉
    Huang, Yi Jia
    Keywords: 藝術注入
    精品品牌
    知覺價值
    知覺獨特
    Date: 2014
    Issue Date: 2015-11-02 14:45:44 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 隨著全球化經濟的發展,藝術和商業結合的範圍與層次越來越廣闊,表現 形式也越來越多元,同時呈現的內涵也越來越具深度與延展性,可見高階藝術與 大眾文化之間往往以跨界合作的創新方式提升品牌價值(Derrick Chong, 2002)。 為此 Hagtvedt & Patrick(2008b)也提出藝術注入理論,其認為當藝術的形象注入 到商品中,將可產生蔓延效果。

    因此,本研究採用 Sweeney & Soutar(2001)的研究構面,將知覺價值區分為 知覺社會價值、知覺品質功能價值、知覺情緒價值和知覺價格功能價值四個構面, 以分別探討藝術注入產品和精品品牌對消費者之產品知覺價值的影響,同時也探 討知覺獨特的中介效果,並討論精品與非精品對藝術注入影響知覺價值的異同。

    本研究鎖定大學生族群為研究樣本,以藝術注入與品牌種類為操弄設計,並 以 Louis Vuitton 為精品象徵性品牌、以 ZARA 為非精品象徵品牌、並以英國知 名藝術家 Damien Hirst 之經典作品「蝴蝶」系列作為藝術注入元素,形成 2(藝 術注入/非藝術注入)x 2(精品品牌/非精品品牌)四種情境的實驗設計。研究結果顯示:

    一、 藝術注入會提升消費者之產品知覺價值內的知覺品質 功能價值、知覺情緒價值與知覺價格功能價值。
    二、 相較於非精品品牌,精品 品牌之知覺價值較高。
    三、 精品品牌與否對藝術注入與知覺價值的關係並無影 響,即非精品品牌亦能透過藝術注入提升知覺價值。
    四、 消費者對產品的知覺 獨特會提升其對產品的知覺價值,而知覺獨特對藝術注入和精品品牌有部分中介 效果。
    Reference: 王智緯(2011)。精品與藝術合作對消費者評價與購買意願的影響並探討商 品價差和品牌知曉度的干擾效果。國立高雄應用科技大學管理學院國際企業 系碩士論文,高雄市。
    田曼詩(1982)。美 學 。台北:三民。 何介舜(2007)。台灣精品業子母公司的競合策略。台灣大學國際企業研究所
    碩士論文,台北市。 池文海、陳瑞龍、潘美雪(2009)。品牌權益、服務品質、知覺價值、顧客滿意
    與顧客忠誠之探討─以台灣中油加油站為例。品 質 學 報 , 16,291-309。 吳瑛茵(2008)。產品稀少性和消費者獨特性需求對購買意願之影響。國立
    成功大學國際企業管理研究所碩士論文,台南市。 康丁斯基(1995)。藝術的精神性。(吳瑪俐譯)。台北市:藝術家出版社。 (原
    著出版年:1912 年)
    吳萬益、林清河(2000)。企 業 研 究 方 法 。台北:華泰。
    高意琇(2010)。消費者精品知覺價值與品牌形象相關之研究-以香奈兒為 例 。大葉大學管理學院碩士在職專班碩士論文,彰化縣。
    行政院文化建設委員會(2005)。魔 幻 城 市 - 科 技 公 共 藝 術 (編號:66482)。 台北市:胡朝聖。
    許文菁(2009)。精品與藝術合作之品牌權益與消費者行為影響。國立交通 大學企業管理碩士學程碩士論文,新竹市。
    張純櫻(2009)。何謂藝術?。藝 術 欣 賞 , 5(6)。13-18。 陳珮萱(2007)。台北市大專院校學生對藝術與品牌合作商品之消費行為調
    查 。國立中山大學藝術管理研究所碩士論文,高雄市。 曾肅良(2004)。藝 術 概 論 。台北:國立空中大學。
    黃柏倫(2009)。藝術導入現象對商品評估的影響。中原大學企業管理研究所 學位論文,桃園市。
    69
    楊雅棠、邱美惠、翁郁權(2011)。獨特性需求、限量策略之消費知覺價值與購 買意願關係之研究—以中式白酒產品為例。商 學 學 報 , 19。55-68。
    張純櫻(2009)。藝 術 概 論 。台北:麗文文化。 廖新田(2008)。台 灣 美 術 四 論 。台北:典藏藝術家庭。
    劉維公(2001)。當代消費文化社會理論的分析架構:文化經濟學、生活風格與 生活美學。東吳社會學報,11。113-136。
    蔣勳(2000)。藝 術 概 論 。台北:東華書局。 戴宇宣(2008)。探討消費者動機與品牌價值對通路選擇的影響—以精品為
    例 。逢甲大學國際貿易研究所碩士論文,台中市。
    鍾德仁(2012)。藝術注入影響消費者美感體驗之研究-以手機待機桌布為例。 輔仁大學企業管理學系碩士論文,新北市。
    Amaldoss,W., & Jain, S. (2005). Pricing of conspicuous goods: A competitive analysis of social effects. Journal of Marketing Research, 42. 30-42.
    Assael Henry (1992).Consumer Behavior and Marketing Action (4th ed.). PWS-KENT.
    Babin, Barry J., & Jill S. Attaway(2000). Atmospheric Affect as a Tool for Creating Value and Gaining Share of Customer. Journal of Business Research, 49 (2). 91-99.
    Baron, R. M., & Kenny D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51. 1173-1182.
    Brock, T. C.(1968). Implications of commodity theory for value change. New York: Academic Dres.
    Gideon Chagy(1970). Business in the arts `70. New York: P.S. Eriksson. Derrick, C. (2012). Arts Management. London: Koutledge.
    Dodds, William B., & Kent B. Monroe (1985). The Effect of Brand and Price Information on Subjective Product Evaluation. Consumer Research, 12. UT: Association for Consumer Research, pp.85-90.
    70
    Dubois, B., & Doquesne, P. (1993). The market for luxury goods: income versus culture. European Journal of Marketing, 27(1). 35-45.
    Dubois, B., Laurent, G., & Czellar, S. (2001). Consumer rapport to luxury: Analyzing complex and ambivalent attitudes. Groupe HEC, 736. 1-56.
    Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975), Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
    Frazier, P. A., Tix, A. P., & Barron, K. E. (2004), “Testing moderator and mediator effects in counseling psychology research,” Journal of Counseling Psychology, 51(1), 115-134.
    Gingerich, P. D. (1969). Markov analysis of cyclic alluvial sediments. Journal of Sedimentary Petrology, 39. 330-332.
    Guilford, J. P., & Fruchter, B. (1978). Fundamental statistics in psychology and education. New York: McGraw Hill.
    Hawkins, D. I., Best, R. J., & Coney, K. A. (1992). Consumer Behavior: Implications for Marketing Strategy (5th ed.). Holmewood, IL: Richard D. Irwin. 359-360.
    Hans Haacke(1981). der Pralinenmeister. Köln : Galerie Paul Maenz.
    Hagtvedt, H., & Patrick, V.M. (2008a), Art and the brand: The role of visual art in
    enhancing brand extendibility. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 18. 212-222.
    Hagtvedt, H., & Patrick, V.M. (2008b), Art Infusion: The Influence of Visual Art on the Perception and Evaluation of Consumer Products. Journal of Marketing Research, 45. 379-389.
    Hoffman, & Barry (2002). The Fine Art of Advertising. New York: Stewart, Tabori and Chang.
    Kandinsky (1989). Du Spirituel dans l`art,et dans la peinture en particulier. France : Denoël.
    Katz, M., & Shapiro C.(1985). Network Externalities, Competition, and Compatibility. American Economic Review, 75(3). 424-440.
    Kotler, P. (1999). Marketing Management: Analysis, Planning, Implementation, and Control (9th ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
    Kolter, P. (2002). Country as brand, product, and beyond: A place marketing and brand management perspective. Journal of Brand Management, 9(4/5). 259-261.
    71
    Lutz, R. J., S.B. MacKenzie, & G.E. Belch (1986). The Role of Attitude toward the Ad as a Mediator of Advertising Effectiveness: A Test of Competing Explanations. Journal of Marketing Research, 8(1). 130-143.
    Lynn, M. (1992). Scarcity’s enhancement of desirability: the role of naïve economic theories. Basic & Applied Social Psychology, 13(1). 67-78.
    Lynn, M. (1991). Scarcity effects on value: a quantitative review of the commodity theory literature. Psychology & Marketing, 8(1). 43-57.
    Monroe, K.B. (1990). Pricing: Making Profitable Decisions. New York: McGraw-Hill.
    Neal, W. D. (2000). For most consumers, loyalty isn’t attitude. Marketing News, 10. 7.
    Nueno, J.L., & Quelch, J. (1998). The mass marketing of luxury. Business Horizons, 41(6). 61-69.
    Parasuraman, A., & Grewal, Dhruv (2000). The impact of technology on the quality-value-loyalty chain: A research agenda. Academy of Marketing Science Journal, 28(1). 168-174.
    Peracchio, L. A., & Joan, M. L. (2005. Using stylistic properties of pictures to communicate with consumers. Journal of Consumer Research, 32. 29-40.
    Ravald, A., & Grönroos, C. (1996). The value concept relationship marketing. European journal of marketing, 30(2). 19-30.
    Riley, F. D., Ehrenberg, A. S. C., & Castleberry, S. B. (1997). The variability of attitudinal repeat-rates. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 14(5). 437-450.
    Rozin, P., Linda, M., & Carol, N. (1986). Operation of the laws of sympathetic magic in disgust and other domains. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50(4). 703-712.
    Rust, R.T., & Oliver, R.L. (1994). Service Quality; New Directions in Theory and Practice. Thousand Oaks. California: SAGE.
    Saloner, G., & Shepard, A. (1995). Adoption of technologies with network effects: an empirical examination of the adoption of automated teller machines. Rand Journal of Economics, 26. 479-501.
    Sawer & Peter Dickson (1984), Psychological Perspectives on Consumer Response to Sales Promotion, in Research on Sales Promotion: Collected Papers. Cambridge, MA:
    72
    Marketing Science Institute.
    Schroeder, J. E. (2002). Visual Consumption. New York: Routledge.
    Shiffman, L. G., & Kanuk, L. L.(2000). Consumer Behavior (7th ed.). New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
    Sheth, J., Newman, B., & Gross, B. (1991). Consumption values and market choices, theory and applications. Cincinnati: South-Western Publishing Co.
    Simonson, I., & Nowlis, S. M. (2000). The role of explanations and need for uniqueness in consumer decision making: Unconventional choices based on reasons. Journal of Consumer Research, 27. 15-17.
    Snyder, C. R., & Fromkin, H. L. (1980). Uniqueness: The human pursuit of difference. New York: Plenum.
    Snyder, M. (1992). Motivational foundations of behavioural confirmation. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 25. 67-114.
    Sweeney, J. C., & Soutar, G. N. (2001). Consumer perceived value: The development of a multiple item scale. Journal of Retailing, 77(2). 203−220.
    Teas, R. Kenneth, & Sanjeev Agarwal (2000). The Effect of Extrinsic Product Cues on Consumers’ Perceptions of Quality, Sacrifice, and Value. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 28(2). 278-90.
    Thaler, R. H. (1985). Mental accounting and consumer choice. Marketing Science, 4. 199-214.
    Tian, Kelly Tepper, & Karyn McKenzie (2001). The Long-term Predictive Validity of the Consumers’ Need for Uniqueness Scale. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 10 (3). 171-193.
    Tynan, C., McKechniea, S., & Chhuon, C. (2009). Co-creating value for luxury brands. Journal of Business Research, 63(11). 1156-1163.
    Vickers, S.J., & Renand, F. (2003). The Marketing of Luxury Goods: An Exploratory Study - three conceptual dimensions. The Marketing Review (3). 12-19.
    Vigneron, F., & Johnson, L.W. (1999). A review and a conceptual framework of prestige-seeking consumer behavior. Journal of Marketing Science Review. 8-10.
    Veblen, Thorstein B. (1899). The Theory of the Leisure Class. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
    73
    Zeithaml, Valarie A. (1988). Consumer Perceptions of Price, Quality, and Value: A Means-End Model and Synthesis of Evidence. Journal of Marketing, 52. 2-22.
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    企業管理研究所
    101355027
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0101355027
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[企業管理學系] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    502701.pdf6435KbAdobe PDF2386View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback