政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/89330
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 109952/140887 (78%)
Visitors : 46375148      Online Users : 1364
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/89330


    Title: 影響社會困境中個體合作行為的因素探討
    Authors: 吳道愉
    WU, DAO-YU
    Contributors: 陳皎眉
    CHEN, JIAO-MEI
    吳道愉
    WU, DAO-YU
    Keywords: 合作行為
    對手動機
    商業決策
    BUSINESS-DECISION
    Date: 1992
    1991
    Issue Date: 2016-05-02 15:20:57 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 為了了解那些因素會影響個體的合作行為,本研究採用2(未來互動的預期:有或無)
    ×2 (自己的動機:合作或競爭)×2 (他人的動機:合作或競爭)的三因子實驗設計,在實驗室中模擬一個商業決策的情境,以探討這三個變項對個體合作行為的影響。
    研究對象為160 名政大的女性學生,研究的結果發現:〝未來互動預期〞這一個變項,在總合作次數、競爭行為發起比率、更改反應的次數、堅持合作行為的比率、及合作堅持性指標上,皆造成顯著的效果;顯示此一條件存在時,可以提高受試者的合作行為,而減低其競爭行為。特別是在互動雙方的關係即將結束時,此一條件更可以抑制受試者的競爭傾向。
    在〝自己的動機〞這一因素上的結果,除了支持〝三角模式〞的說法之外,亦發現在總合作次數、競爭行為發起比率及合作堅持指標上,受試者的動機對其行為都有重要的影響;即有合作動機的受試者,比較會表現出合作行為,有競爭動機的受試者則比較會表現出競爭行為。
    在〝對手動機〞這一個因素上,發現它對總合作次數、競爭行為發起比率、更改反應的次數及堅持合作行為的比率這四個指標上,都造成顯著的影響。及個體和合作者互動時,比較會做出合作行為;和競爭者互動時,則比較會做出競爭行為。
    在〝自己的動機〞和〝對手動機〞的交互作用效果上,發現合作者比較容易受到對手動機(行為)的影響,而競爭者的行為雖也會受到對手的影響而做出調整,但是這種改變自己行為的傾向並不如合作者那麼強。
    研究者並根據上述的結果進行討論。
    Reference: 壹、中文部份:
    陳皎眉。(民77年)。「從社會困境的理論、實驗與調查看如何減少自私行為」。台北:正昇教育科學社。
    陳皎眉。(民81年)。「社會困境的泛文化研究」。尚未發表之報告。
    葉光輝。(民72年)。「人情取向、分配方式與工作表現」。國立臺灣大學心理學研究所碩士論文。
    劉英茂。(民69年)。「基本心理歷程」。台北:大洋出版社。
    鄭宗慧。(民79年)。「告知抽查機率與否、抽查機率高低與懲罰程度高低對社會困境中行為的影響」。政大心理研究所碩士論文。
    鍾昆原。(民76年)。「社會困境中貪心與耽心動機因素之探討」。政大心理研究所碩士論文。
    貳、英文部分
    Battistich, V.A. & Aronoff, J. (985). Perceiver, target and situational influences on social cognition: An interactional analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychologv.tl(3).788-798.
    Ben-Yoav, O. & Pruitt, D.G.(l980). Accountability to constituents: A two edged sword. Organizational Behavior and Human Perforrnance.34.283-295.
    Braver, S.L. & Rohere, V. (975). When martyrdom pays: The effect of information
    concerning the opponent`s past game behavior. Journal of Conflict Resolution. 19..(4) .652-662.
    Christie, R. (1970). Scale construction. in Christie, R. and Geis, P.L.
    Study in Machiavellianism New York: Academic Press.
    Dawes, R.M. (980). Social dilemma. Annual Review of PsychoJogY.3..1.169-193
    Edney, J.J. (1979). Free riders en route to disasyer. Psychology Today.
    U(3) .80-87.
    Hancock & Sorrentine(1980). The effects of expected future interaction
    & prior group support on the conformity procecss. Journal of experimental
    and Socjal PsychologY.16.261-269.
    Hardin, G. (968). The tragedy of the commons.Science.162.1243-1248.
    Heider , F. (958). The psychology of interoersonal relations. New York: IJ:
    Kelley, H.H. & Grzelak, J. (972) .Conflict between individual and common
    interest in an N-person relationship. Journal of Personality and Social PsychologY.2 .. 1.190-197.
    Kelley, H.H. & Stahelski, A.J. (1970a). Error in perception of intentions in a mixed-motive game .Journal of personality and Social Psychology 11.379-400.
    Kelley, H.H. & Stahelski, A.J. (1970b). Social interaction basis of cooperators`
    and competitors` beliefs of about others. Journal of personality and Social PsychologY.1.6.(l).66-91.
    Kiesler, C.A. & Corbin, L.H. (1965). Commitment, attraction and conformity
    Journal of Personality and Social psychology.2.(6) .890-895.
    Kramer, R.M. & McClintock, C.G. & Messick. D.H. (986).Social values and
    cooperative response to a simulated resource conservation crisis. Journal of personality. 5A..(3) .567-592.
    Kuhlman. D.M. & Marshello, A.F.J. (1975a). Indivi9ual differences in the game motives of own. relative. and joint gain. Journal of Research in Personaljty.9.240-251.
    Kuhlman. D.H. & Harshello. A.F . J. 0975b). Individual differences in game
    motivation as moderators of programmed strategy effect in prisoner`
    dilemma. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology.32(5).922-931.
    Kuhlman, D.M. &Wimberley. D.L. (1976) .Expections of choice behavior held
    by cooperator, competitor and individualists across four class of experimental games. Journal of Personality and Social psychology. 3..A.(l).69-81.
    Lynn. H. & Oldenquist, A. (1986) .Egoistic and nonegotstic motivation in
    social dilemmas. American Psychology. U(S) .529-534.
    Maki. J.E. & McClintock, C.G. (1983). The accuracy of social value prediction:
    Actor and observer. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology .U(4) .829-838.
    Marlowe, D. ;Gergen, K.J. & Doob, A.H. (1966). Opponent`s personality, expection
    of social interaction and interpersonal bargaining. Journal
    of Personal ity and Socjal Psychologv.,1.(2) .206-213.
    McNeeI. S.P. (1973). Training cooperation in the prisoner`s dilemma. Journal of Experimental and Social Psychology .. 9...335-348.
    McNeel. S.P. & Sweeney. J.D. & Bohlin, P.C.(1974). Cooperation and competitive
    goals: A social comparison analysis. Psychological Reports. 34,887-894.
    Hesse, L.A . & Sivacek, J.M. (979). Predictions of others` response in a mixed-motive game: Self-justification or false consensus? Journal of Personality and Social Psychologv.37C41.602-607.
    Messick, D.M. & McClintock, C.G. (1968). Motivational bases of choice in experimental games. Journal of Experimental and Social psychology. 4.1-25.
    Messick. D.M. :Wilke. H. :Drewer. H.B. :Zemke. D. & Lui. L. (983). Individual
    adaptions and situational change as solutions to social dilemmas. Journal of personality and social Psychology,44(2).294-309.
    Hiller, D.T. & Holmes. J.G.(1975). The role of situational restrictiveness on self-fulfilling prophepies: A Theoretical and empirical extension of Kelley and Stahelski’s Triangle hypothsis. Journal of Personality and social Psychology (4).661-673.
    Platt. J. (1973). Social traps. American Psycologist.28.641-651.
    Poppe. M. & Utens. L. (1986). Effects of greed and fear of being gypped in a social dilemma situation with changing pool size. Journal of Ecomonic psychology.L.61-73.
    Rapport. A. & Chammah. A.M. (1965). prisoner’s dilemma: A study in conflict
    and cooperation.- Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
    TeDeshi, J.T. & Riordam. C.A. & Gaes .G.G. & Kane, T. (1983). Verbal accounts
    and attributions of social motives. Journal of Research in Personality.l7.218-225.
    Veary. G. (1982) .Self-presentation and the motivation of self-serving at butional biases. Social Cognition. 1(2) .140-159.
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    心理學系
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#B2002004416
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[Department of Psychology] Theses

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    index.html0KbHTML2320View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback