English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 112721/143689 (78%)
Visitors : 49577666      Online Users : 899
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/94993


    Title: 歐盟的法律地位－尋找歐盟的定義
    Other Titles: The Legal Status of the European Union-In Search of a Definition
    Authors: 劉明德
    Wagner, Prof. Dr. Helmut;Liu, Ming-Te
    Keywords: 歐洲聯盟;邦聯;聯邦;憲法條約;卡爾施密特
    European Union;Confederation;Federation;constitution treaty;Carl Schmitt
    Date: 2006-07
    Issue Date: 2016-05-09 14:03:20 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 本文所要探討的是一個尚未回答的問題，也就是歐盟的法律地位問題，換句話說，歐盟在法律上屬於哪一類型的政治組織？
    很顯然的，以傳統法律術語裡面所定義的聯邦去定位歐盟並不合適。目前的歐盟，既不是聯邦，也不應視為邦聯。當然，她也不能被稱做一個國家，因為她並沒有也不順爭取做為一個國家所必須具備的最高決策權力。根據歐盟憲法條約草案第一條第十一項第二款的規定，歐盟任何一種權力的取得以歐盟成員國的個別授權為限。因此，如何定義歐盟，至今還沒有人給過一個大家都能接受的答案。
    筆者認為，給予歐盟一個法律地位，仍然是必要的。因此，我們有必要尋找一個新的術語來界定歐盟，這一個迄今尚未出現過的政治體。
    The article deals with an unanswered question of how the legal status of the European Union may be characterized. In other words: What kind of political community the EU belongs to?
    It is rather easy to demonstrate that the juridical terms, which were used traditionally to define federally organized political units, are not appropriate to characterize the European Union. It may not be treated as a confederation of sovereign states nor as a federal state, and the EU itself resists being called a state at all. It is because that the EU does not possess and is not willing to compete for the monopoly of power. According to Article 1-11(2) of the Brussels Constitutional Treaty, the power of the EU is limited to ”individual authorizations,” by which it was conferred on by the EU member states.
    However, so far nobody has succeeded in defining the special status of the EU, let alone reaching for universal approval by doing so.
    The constitutional quality of the EU, as it is understood by the author, has yet to be classified. We are still in search of an adequate new term for a new, hitherto unknown political creature - which, for the time being, remains the cause of all kinds of fears as well as great hopes.
    Relation: 問題與研究, 45(4), 123-136
    Issues & studies
    Data Type: article
    Appears in Collections:[問題與研究 TSSCI] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    454123.pdf876KbAdobe PDF2429View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback