English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 112721/143689 (78%)
Visitors : 49600315      Online Users : 512
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/96072


    Title: 台灣氣候變遷政策之論述分析
    Other Titles: Climate Change Policy in Taiwan: A Discourse Approach
    Authors: 林子倫
    Lin, Tze-Luen
    Keywords: 論述分析;論述聯盟;氣候變遷;環境政治;政策論述
    discourse analysis;discourse coalition;climate change;environmental politics;policy discourse
    Date: 2008-09
    Issue Date: 2016-05-10 16:24:41 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 公共政策研究在一九九○年代出現了所謂「語言的」、「論證的」、以及「審議的」等學術研究焦點的轉向，反映了學界逐漸重視「語言」在政治過程所扮演的角色，以及其在政策制定過程的影響。學者主張政策過程具有詮釋性與論證性的本質，透過論述分析，將有助於觀察政策過程中，行動者究竟是如何形塑他們的利益、主張及理念。本文採取論述取向的研究途徑，探討台灣自一九九二年至二○○八年以來氣候變遷政策論述的演進，作者並歸納出兩個主要的論述聯盟：一個為立基於技術與經濟理性的「環境實用主義論述聯盟」，另一個為立基於生態理性的「氣候行動論述聯盟」。本文透過四個歷史分期，討論兩個論述聯盟在各個時期的政經脈絡下所形塑的氣候政策論述。
    The 1990s witnesses a so called “linguistic turn”, “argumentative turn”, or “deliberative turn” in the study of public policy. This reflects an increasing role of “language” in the political process as well as the policy making process. Writers argue that the policy making process is both interpretive and argumentative by nature. In terms of discourse analysis, we would be able to look at the way in which actors shape their interests, claims and ideas. Taking a discourse analysis approach, this paper explores the climate change policy in Taiwan from 1992 to 2008. The author identifies two discourse coalitions in the climate policy process: one is called “environmental pragmatist discourse coalition”, which emphasizes technical and economic rationalities; and the other is called “climate action discourse coalition”, which embraces ecological rationality. The paper analyzes and discusses the climate policy discourses in the political and economic context of the two major discourse coalitions in four different periods of time.
    Relation: 公共行政學報, 28,153-175
    Journal of Public Administration National Chengchi University
    Data Type: article
    Appears in Collections:[公共行政學報 TSSCI] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    28-5(p.153-175).pdf1013KbAdobe PDF23873View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback