政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/96617
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  全文筆數/總筆數 : 110189/141115 (78%)
造訪人次 : 46803197      線上人數 : 764
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜尋範圍 查詢小技巧:
  • 您可在西文檢索詞彙前後加上"雙引號",以獲取較精準的檢索結果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜尋,建議至進階搜尋限定作者欄位,可獲得較完整資料
  • 進階搜尋
    請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/96617


    題名: 政治共同體?︰巴迪烏的真理政治學
    其他題名: The Political Community?: Alain Badiou’s Politics of Truth
    作者: 楊志偉
    Yang, Julian Chih Wei
    關鍵詞: 巴迪烏;政治;共同體;真理
    Badiou;politics;community;truth
    日期: 2011-06
    上傳時間: 2016-05-13 12:03:20 (UTC+8)
    摘要:   對於「共同體」(community)一詞,巴迪烏似乎顯露出種種的懷疑與保留。一方面,他在〈哲學與政治〉(“Politics and Philosophy”)一文中說到,當代的政治經濟論述企圖否認「共同體」的有效性,使得巴迪烏認為「共同體」與「共群」辭彙已無法涵蓋他的政治企圖。然而,在《論薩柯奇》(The Meaning of Sarkozy)一書中,巴迪烏卻再三強調「唯有共同體的命題才是正確的命題」(97)。本文的基本論調是,共同體一詞實乃巴迪烏的政治想像的核心概念,不可偏廢。同時,在政治與共同體之間,必須還要加上「真理」這個關鍵詞才能窮盡其政治構想;亦即,政治、真理、與共同體這三者在巴迪烏的政治藍圖之中,實乃缺一不可。全文分成四部分。第一部分重探巴迪烏在〈哲學與政治〉一文中所討論種種將共同體視為不可能的論述,並說明巴迪烏對「共同體」一詞的政治適切性所呈現的保留態度。第二部分則闡明巴迪烏真理過程(truth procedure)的構想,釐清政治與真理的關係,藉此廓清巴迪烏的政治學如何做為一種真理政治學(politics of truth)。接著,本文探討巴迪烏的真理政治學如何以共同體作為根基,證明其真理政治想像必然同時是一種共同體的想像。最後,立基於此一共同體政治學,本文則企圖解決早期巴迪烏對於共同體的所產生的信心危機,並說明其政治思想如何能對抗將共同體視為不可能的論述潮流。
    This paper aims to read Alain Badiou’s politics of truth as a vision of establishing the political community. In his works, Badiou shows a certain ambiguity toward the notion of community. On the one hand, he designates the word “community” and its correlates—such as “communism,” “communist,” and “collective”—as an inadequate name for what he means by politics. As his “Philosophy and Politics” indicates, the dominant political and economic climate is to celebrate community as impossible, which causes him to assume the term as improper for his political imagination. However, the idea of community recurs frequently in his metapolitical articulations. In Being and Event (1988), politics is depicted as a generic and collective process. In The Meaning of Sarkozy, Badiou even affirms twice that “communism is the right hypothesis” (97, 115). These seemingly conflicting attitudes make it worthwhile to further examine the possibility and necessity of adhering to the “community” and its cognates as effective categories in his political vision. Instead of siding with Badiou’s reservation about “community” and thus renouncing its political efficacy, in this paper I insist upon understanding this term as the core of his politics. My argument is that Badiou’s fundamental political prescription is to formulate politics as such in the communal form, even when other terms such as “collective” or “generic” rather than “community” or “communism” are referred to. More important, his political and communal, or political-as-communal, hypothesis has to be grasped in light of a third term: truth. Badiou’s political community is after all constituted and traversed by the (political) truth, making his community a community of truth and his politics a politics of truth. To foreground the import of truth in the Badiouean politics, I further contend, is to maintain the validity of “community” against discourses that assert its impossibility. To clarify my thesis, the paper will consist of four parts. The first section copes with Badiou’s review of the several accounts that put into question the possibility of community and probes into his consequent concern about community as a valid name for politics. The second part explores Badiou’s formulation of the truth procedure and explains his politics as a politics of truth. Based upon this understanding, the paper then broaches the nature of his political imagination and thereby justifies communism as the core of his politics. In conclusion, I will return to Badiou’s crisis of confidence regarding the pertinence of community to politics and demonstrate how his later resumption of the faith in the collective form of politics helps to nullify his earlier doubts and the discourses exalting the impossibility of community.
    關聯: 文山評論:文學與文化, 4(2),115-154
    The Wenshan Review of Literature and Culture
    資料類型: article
    顯示於類別:[文山評論:文學與文化 THCI Core] 期刊論文

    文件中的檔案:

    檔案 描述 大小格式瀏覽次數
    4(2)p115-154.pdf477KbAdobe PDF2328檢視/開啟


    在政大典藏中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回饋