English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 109951/140887 (78%)
Visitors : 46278136      Online Users : 1558
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/96640


    Title: 「歷史可以被原諒,但不能遺忘」,或生命的歸零?有關檔案、見證與記憶政治的一些哲學思考
    Authors: 黃涵榆
    Huang, Han-yu
    Keywords: 檔案;寬恕;記憶;見證;正義;遺忘
    archive;forgiveness;memory;witness;justice;forgetting
    Date: 2013-06
    Issue Date: 2016-05-13 14:41:01 (UTC+8)
    Abstract:   人類在不同的階段裡發展出不同的保存、延續與複製記憶的技術。檔案之為一種記憶技術,顯示出吾人宣稱為本體存在與歷史真實不可或缺的一部分的記憶,實為諸多論述、學科、體制與權力競逐之場域,個人記憶也因而與集體記憶縫合,但兩者之間卻也常處在矛盾衝突狀態。本文所關注的問題是:當前包括台灣在內面對「歷史創傷」的時代氛圍裡,是否充斥「檔案狂熱」、「悼念狂熱」或者「回歸根源」之潮流?解放受壓迫/抑的記憶、為受難者平反、尋求歷史正義是否成了當前不言可喻的道德律令?然而,在遺忘與記憶、壓迫與解放、寬恕與嫌惡、創傷與療癒之間,是否有諸多本體存在、政治倫理與科技文化等層面上有待釐清的錯綜複雜關係?本論文將透過傅柯、呂克爾、德希達與史提格勒等哲學思想,針對這些問題提出一些可能的思考路徑。
      Human societies at various historical epochs have invented different techniques of replicating, retaining and continuing memories. The archive, as a kind of mnemonic technique, is a manifestation of the fact that memory always stands as the site of contestation for discourses, disciplines, and institutions; accordingly, personal memory may be sutured to or conflicting with public, collective memory. This paper explores the following major research questions: Is the contemporary era witnessing an “archive fever” or “mania for memorization”? Have the causes of liberating oppressed/repressed memories, atoning victims, and implementing justice been elevated to the status of ethical imperatives? How are forgetting and remembering, oppression and liberation, forgiveness and resentment, trauma and curing implicated with each other in the ontological, political-ethical, and techno-cultural dimensions? This paper seeks to answer these questions in light of the thought of Stiegler, Foucault, Ricoeur, Derrida and Agamben.
    Relation: 文山評論:文學與文化, 6(2),53-92
    The Wenshan Review of Literature and Culture
    Data Type: article
    Appears in Collections:[文山評論:文學與文化 THCI Core] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    6(2)-3.pdf1743KbAdobe PDF2284View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback