English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 110097/141043 (78%)
Visitors : 46411893      Online Users : 664
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/100379


    Title: 環境治理機制之初探：以臺北水源特定區範圍劃定為例
    Other Titles: A Preliminary Study on Environmental Governance Institutions: A Case Study for Delineation of The Taipei Water Source Domain
    Authors: 劉筱蕾;賴世剛
    Liu, Hsiao-Lei;Lai, Shih-Kung
    Keywords: 社會選擇機制;水源保護區;共同財產資源;治理
    Social Choice Mechanism;Watershed Protection Aeas;CommonProperty Resources;Governance
    Date: 2008-11
    Issue Date: 2016-08-18 11:40:49 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 水源保護區治理因其關乎著多目標使用、公共利益、以及民眾權益問題，故常面臨沒有人願意為公共利益而犧牲之窘境，然水源保護區不同的利害關係人對於水資源有著不同的偏好，如何建立整合個人偏好成為社會偏好的社會選擇機制，使得水源保護區治理可以兼顧多元價值並符合民主程序，將成為本文主要探討的重點。本研究試圖以水源保護區範圍劃定為例，探討水源保護區治理所面臨之困境，水源保護區治理應具備之理念，以及水源保護區應治理的方式，並以臺北水源特定區為個案研究，探討運用社會選擇機制治理水源保護區之可行性，分別以訪談或問卷進行實證研究。本研究發現，目前台北水源特定區之範圍劃定，造成管理體系及制度之成本提高、囚犯困境、經濟外部性、治理正當性等問題，但各方利害關係人均認同社會選擇理念，來決策水源保護區之範圍劃定，但也均認為立法委員投票這樣的社會選擇機制，將無法解決水源保護區所面臨之困境。
    Owing to multiple purposes and public interestsin protecting watershed areas, no individual would be willing to sacrifice himself/herself for public benefit. Different stakeholders in watershed protection areas have different preferences. How to establish mechanisms for integrating personal preferences to social preferences is the main issue of incorporating multiple values in a democratic procedure for protecting watershed areas. The current paper depicts the difficulties in governing Taipei Water Source Domain. Based on the results of questionnaires, the paper makes recommendations as to how watershed protectionareas should be governed. The results show that high transaction costs, prisoner’s dilemma, externality, governance legitimization are common issues in the delineation of the Taipei Water Source Domain. Different stakeholders have agreed to use social choice mechanisms for delineating watershed protection areas, but have opposed to entrust legislators to vote on their behalf.
    Relation: 臺灣土地研究, 11(2), 37-60
    Journal of Taiwan land research
    Data Type: article
    Appears in Collections:[臺灣土地研究 TSSCI] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    11(2)-37-60.pdf954KbAdobe PDF2287View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback