 |
English
|
正體中文
|
简体中文
|
Post-Print筆數 : 27 |
Items with full text/Total items : 110934/141854 (78%)
Visitors : 47776559
Online Users : 596
|
|
|
Loading...
|
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/103339
|
| Title: | State Secrets Privilege: Origins, Parameters, and Application |
| Authors: | 薛朝勇
Huseh, Chao-Yung |
| Keywords: | executive privilege;state secrets privilege;national security;judicial review;Chen Shui-bian |
| Date: | 2007-12 |
| Issue Date: | 2016-10-25 17:22:05 (UTC+8) |
| Abstract: | On January 25, 2007, for the first time in Taiwan`s history, President Chen Shui-bian filed a request for a constitutional interpretation and invoked the state secrets privilege in an attempt to shield the first lady from a corruption trial. The interpretation sparked a national uproar and many in the media voiced criticism of the president. The controversy centered on the assertion by the grand justices that the president enjoys ”special privilege over state secrets,” and that he alone can decide what is a state secret. Some argued that this is a ”super umbrella” of protection tailored for the president, which may lead to the creation of a dictatorship and allow a ruler to cheat the people in the name of ”protecting national secrets.”The state secrets privilege has been described as the ”nuclear bomb of legal tactics,” which is most often used by the executive branch in civil court cases to protect against subpoenas, discovery motions, or other judicial requests of information. Based the application of this privilege in the United States, we find that state secrets privilege is increasingly subject to abuse to hide criminal activity, and to thwart legal requests for information and close off investigations. We argue that the state secrets privilege should be treated as qualified, not absolute. Otherwise there is no adversary process in court and no exercise of judicial independence over available evidence. The judiciary should take steps to prevent the state secrets privilege from remaining a license for executive overreaching, and to prevent injustice from being committed in the name of secrecy. |
| Relation: | Issues & Studies,43(4),185-225 |
| Data Type: | article |
| Appears in Collections: | [Issues & Studies] 期刊論文
|
Files in This Item:
| File |
Description |
Size | Format | |
|---|
| 43(4)-185-225.pdf | | 1348Kb | Adobe PDF2 | 334 | View/Open |
|
All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.
|
著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.
2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(
nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(
nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
