 |
English
|
正體中文
|
简体中文
|
Post-Print筆數 : 27 |
Items with full text/Total items : 110180/141115 (78%)
Visitors : 46590420
Online Users : 455
|
|
|
Loading...
|
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/104445
|
| Title: | 気候変動問題の国連交渉に対する検討－－「ツー・トラック」を中心に 聯合國氣候變遷國際談判之檢討－－以「雙軌制」為中心 |
| Other Titles: | 聯合國氣候變遷國際談判之檢討－－以「雙軌制」為中心（International Negotiation on Climate Change under the UN Framework: Principle, Process and the `Two-track` System） |
| Authors: | 鄭方婷 |
| Keywords: | 氣候變遷;聯合國氣候變遷綱要公約;峇里島行動計畫;哥本哈根協議;締約國會議;COP;Climate change;UNFCCC;Bali Action Plan (BAP);Copenhagen Accord;Conference of Parties (COP) |
| Date: | 2011-12 |
| Issue Date: | 2016-12-02 15:25:05 (UTC+8) |
| Abstract: | 現在（2011 年）の国連気候変動交渉プラットフォームは、AWG-KP（京都議定書に依拠）とAWG- LCA（国連気候変動枠組条約に依拠）という二つの作業部会で構成される「ツー・トラック」ある。このシステムは、本来「独立性」と「競争性」という二つの性質を備えている。「独立性」とは、次期枠組み交渉における各トラック間の相互不干渉性である。また 「競争性」とは、トラック間で次期枠組み草案の早期合意を競うポジティブな関係を指す。しかし、現状は交渉国間の強い利害対立を背景に、現在両トラック間では「独立性の欠如」により「負の競争性」が生成され、国連気候変動交渉の進展を妨げていることから、 本稿では「負の競争性」の生成メカニズムと交渉に与える影響を詳細に分析した。国連は、ツー・トラック方式の一本化、相互協力機関の設置などを検討し始めている。実現には困難を伴うことが予想されるが、各国は依然として交渉方式の改良を目指し、模索し続け ている。 聯合國針對氣候變遷問題自2008年起以「雙軌制」（two-track）進行國際談判。所謂「雙軌制」是指談判在兩個特設工作小組之下舉行，分別為附屬於京都議定書之下的「關於先進國家之進一步承諾特設工作小組」（AWG-KP）以及附屬於氣候變遷綱要公約之下的「關於長期合作行動特設工作小組」（AWG-LCA）。本文透過分析，指出雙軌之間在本質上應具有「獨立關係」，即雙軌之間互不干涉，各自協定草案以作為後京都氣候合作方案的一部分。另外，應具有「競爭關係」，即雙軌間為促進早日達成後京都體制所具備的積極特性。然而，在締約國間強烈利益衝突的背景之下，雙軌間之獨立關係崩潰，負面的競爭關係應運而生。本文除指出聯合國氣候談判的種種內生問題外，並視雙軌制的不完善運作為造成聯合國氣候談判陷入僵局的主要原因之一。This paper analyzes the challenges presented in the UN-led climate change negotiations from a process perspective, focusing primarily on the two-track system. Following the adoption of the Bali Action Plan in December 2007, the current two-track system was launched in a bid to produce agreements for the post-Kyoto regime. Two-track negotiations–negotiations taken place respectively at the Ad Hoc Working Groups under the Kyoto Protocol (AWG-KP) and under the Convention (AWG-LCA)–entail both independence and competitiveness: independence in that each track works separately to agree upon respective draft frameworks, while competitiveness indicates that the two working groups, given a fixed period of time to negotiate, compete to reach an early consensus. However, with strongly conflicting countries participating in a dual manner, a lack of true independence has resulted in a negative competitiveness, which in turn has triggered a deprivation of cooperation and unwillingness to compromise. Unable to reconcile fundamental discrepancies between countries, the two-track scheme should be regarded as the cause of the UN stalemate on climate change negotiation. Calls of track unification or the establishment of mutual cooperation between the two working groups have been given consideration.
This paper analyzes the challenges presented in the UN-led climate change negotiations from a process perspective, focusing primarily on the two-track system. Following the adoption of the Bali Action Plan in December 2007, the current two-track system was launched in a bid to produce agreements for the post-Kyoto regime. Two-track negotiations–negotiations taken place respectively at the Ad Hoc Working Groups under the Kyoto Protocol (AWG-KP) and under the Convention (AWG-LCA)–entail both independence and competitiveness: independence in that each track works separately to agree upon respective draft frameworks, while competitiveness indicates that the two working groups, given a fixed period of time to negotiate, compete to reach an early consensus. However, with strongly conflicting countries participating in a dual manner, a lack of true independence has resulted in a negative competitiveness, which in turn has triggered a deprivation of cooperation and unwillingness to compromise. Unable to reconcile fundamental discrepancies between countries, the two-track scheme should be regarded as the cause of the UN stalemate on climate change negotiation. Calls of track unification or the establishment of mutual cooperation between the two working groups have been given consideration. |
| Relation: | 問題と研究,40-4,135-167 |
| Data Type: | article |
| Appears in Collections: | [問題と研究] 期刊論文
|
Files in This Item:
| File |
Description |
Size | Format | |
|---|
| 40-4-5.pdf | | 667Kb | Adobe PDF2 | 165 | View/Open |
|
All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.
|
著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.
2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(
nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(
nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
