English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 92429/122733 (75%)
Visitors : 26452231      Online Users : 300
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/105072


    Title: 離島鄉土誌書寫中的生態與性別意涵:陳淑瑤《流水帳》(台灣澎湖)與池上永一《風車祭》(沖繩八重山)
    Other Titles: Ecological and Gender Implications in Local Writings from Remote Islands: Chen Shu-yao’s Daily Journal Entries and Ikegami Eichi’s Kajimaya
    Authors: 朱惠足
    Chu, Huei-chu
    Keywords: 澎湖;沖繩;陳淑瑤;池上永一;鄉土書寫;生態書寫
    Date: 2014-06
    Issue Date: 2016-12-19 14:32:52 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 本文以台灣與日本的離島出身作家陳淑瑤《流水帳》(澎湖)與池上永一《風車祭》(八重山)為例,探討小說中以農業社會歲時節令與神靈信仰為中心的離島鄉土誌書寫具有何種生態與性別意涵。在兩部小說中,澎湖與八重山離島與自然生態密切聯繫的前現代農業生活、神靈信仰、庶民語言與村落共同體,如何分別標示台灣與澎湖的族群認同、日本與沖繩的族群差異,呈現台灣與沖繩本土化運動中對於「女性鄉土」的建構?兩部小說中離島鄉土誌書寫的生態與性別意涵,分別如何呈現此一性別化的鄉土想像與國家現代化、在地父權的相互建構性以及性別權力關係?本文討論的結果顯示出,後現代主體與關係重建不能只是將自然、女性、庶民、聲音等他者建構為未受現代性污染的「純粹本質」,或是去歷史化、去脈絡化的抽象混雜性,而應探討資本主義現代性如何與在地父權形成既頡頏又共謀的關係,藉由對各種現代性「他者」的收編與排除生產出各種「在地性」,以合法化其支配權威與邏輯。
    This article deals with two novels by writers from Penghu Islands and Yaeyama Islands, remote islands of Taiwan and Japan, and explores the ecological and gender implications in the local writings featuring solar terms, traditional festivals and folk beliefs in agricultural society. In the local cultural movement in Taiwan and in Okinawa, how are the sexualized local imaginations constructed through agricultural lifestyle, spiritual beliefs, folk dialects, and village communities? How do the ecological and gender implications in the novels expose the mutual construction process between the female/local image, nation-state’s modernization project, and local patriarchy? The discussion in this article shows that, a postmodern subject and relation reconstruction cannot view women, nature, and voice as “pure essence” unpolluted by modernity or as dehistoricized and decontextualized concept of hybridity. Instead, we should explore how capitalist modernity forms a complex relation of alliance and competition with local patriarchy, and legitimizes its authority and logics of dominations by produces various “locality” through inclusion and exclusion of its Others.
    Relation: 臺灣文學學報,24,63-90
    Data Type: article
    Appears in Collections:[臺灣文學學報 THCI Core] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    24-63-90.pdf2463KbAdobe PDF205View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback