English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 110080/141030 (78%)
Visitors : 46391070      Online Users : 718
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/111377


    Title: 孩童早期受托照顧與兒童犯罪之關聯性探討
    The association between child care arrangement and child crime
    Authors: 黃政翰
    Contributors: 陳鎮洲
    黃政翰
    Keywords: 托育照顧
    課後
    兒童發展
    偏差行為
    犯罪
    Child care
    After-school
    Child development
    Delinquency
    Crime
    Date: 2017
    Issue Date: 2017-07-24 12:16:42 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 托育安排對幼兒發展有著長遠影響。本研究旨在探討托育安排與兒童犯罪的可能關聯性。資料涵蓋自1998年至2015年間臺灣地區共16個縣市,估計方法採用最小平方法、固定效果以及隨機效果模型。
    研究結果顯示,縣市的兒童犯罪率與其課後托育的比例有負向關聯,意味著當一個縣市有著較高比例的課後托育兒童時,其兒童犯罪率會進而降低。另外,結果亦指出,如離婚率、婚生嬰兒比以及人口密度等解釋變數,與兒童犯罪率呈現顯著相關。然而,破獲率和警政支出似乎與兒童犯罪率無關。
    鑑此,為避免課後托育匱乏所帶來的長久負面效應,應在托育政策的制訂上,建立一個安全友善、平價普及的課後托育制度;其次,地方政府也應在幼托政策上投注更多資源,以達到兒童犯罪預防的效果;最後,政府機構須正視區域發展失衡對孩童的影響。
    Childcare arrangement plays an important role to child development. This study is to explore the possible correlation between childcare arrangement and child crime.
    The data is from 16 counties and cities in Taiwan from 1998 to 2015. The estimation methods are ordinary least squares, fixed effects and random effects models.
    The results show that a county/city’s child crime rate is negative correlated to its after-school care ratio, which implies that when a county/city has a higher proportion of children in after-school care programs, the child crime rate would be lower. The results also show that some explanatory variables, like divorce rate, legitimate baby ratio and population density, are significantly correlated to child crime rate. However, crime detection rate and police expenditure seem to be not correlated with child crime rate.
    In formulation of proper childcare policy, it is important to create a safe, friendly, affordable, and universal after-school care system. So, it could ensure that the long-term negative effect from lacking of after-school care program. In addition, local government should spend more resource on child care programs in order to achieve the effectiveness of child crime prevention. Finally, government agency should also address the regional development imbalances on children.
    Reference: 中文文獻
    王淑英、孫嫚薇(2003)。托育照顧政策中的國家角色。國家政策季刊,2(4),147-174。
    王舒芸(2014)。門裡門外誰照顧、平價普及路迢迢?。台灣社會研究季刊,96,49-93。
    王舒芸、王品(2014)。台灣照顧福利的發展與困境:1990-2012。載於女學會、陳瑤華(主編),台灣婦女處境白皮書:2014年(29-76頁)。臺北市:女書文化。
    王舒芸、鄭清霞、吳又建、黃喬鈴、李庭欣、陳政隆、李怡萱、鍾宛真、顏淑韻(2014)。我國托育服務供給模式與收費機制之研究。衛生福利部社會及家庭署103年度委託國立中正大學之研究計劃(計畫編號103006)。
    吳君黎(2009)。照顧安排、家庭育兒環境與兒童早期發展。國立臺灣大學衛生政策與管理研究所博士論文,臺北市。
    吳銘祥(2007)。當孩子遇上霸凌。師友月刊,479,45-49。
    李介至、劉雅琳、陳盈妃、李英中(2014)。親子互動對托育類型及二歲幼兒發展能力之調節效果。健康與照顧科學學刊,2(1),36-55。
    李新民(2001)。課後托育理論與實務。高雄市:麗文。
    李新民(2002)。美國課後輔導方案對國內課後托育的啟示。高雄師大學報,13,235-256。
    周愫嫻、曹立群(2007)。犯罪學理論及其實證。臺北市:五南。
    周愫嫻、温淑盈(2004)。家庭結構、家庭功能、自我控制與兒童問題行為之縱貫性研究。犯罪與刑事司法研究,3,149-197。
    林佩珊、賀湘邦、王以仁(2012)。嘉義市國小高年級學童親子關係、自我控制與其偏差行為之現況分析。家庭教育雙月刊,39,6-20。
    林明仁、劉仲偉(2006)。失業真的會導致犯罪嗎?以臺灣1978年至2003年縣市資料為例。經濟論文叢刊,34(4),445-482。
    邱志鵬、劉兆隆、謝友文、劉佳潔、姜欣怡(2012)。我國幼兒托育制度之研究。行政院研究發展考核委員會委託臺北市立教育大學之研究報告(RDEC-RES-100-015)。
    邱柏嘉(2015)。臺灣人口特性與犯罪率關係之研究。國立成功大學政治經濟研究所博士論文,臺南市。
    侯崇文(2001)。家庭結構、家庭關係與青少年偏差行為探討。應用心理學,11,25-43。
    姜全保、李波(2011)。性别失衡對犯罪率的影響研究。公共管理學報,1,71- 80。
    徐明(2010)。學齡前兒童社會情緒發展危機因素探討。康寧學報,12,1-17。
    馬祖琳、陳蓓微、陳淑華、蘇怡萍、謝惠如(2000)。課後托育機構服務內容之個案研究。醫護科技學刊,2(1),1-11。
    張紉(2005)。青少年偏差及犯罪行為問題。載於瞿海源、張苙雲(主編),台灣的社會問題(頁 402-435)。臺北市:巨流。
    張美娟、段慧瑩(2005)。花蓮地區母親對幼兒托育服務選擇理由、重要程度及托育滿意度之探討。醫護科技學刊,7(1),106-120。
    張景然(2001)。青少年犯罪學。臺北市:巨流。
    張楓明、譚子文(2011)。個人信念、負向生活事件、偏差同儕與青少年初次偏差行為關聯性之實證研究。青少年犯罪防治研究期刊,3(1),133-160。
    莊忠柱、楊淑芬(2002)。影響臺灣普通刑事犯罪率因素的探討。環境與管理研究,3(1),77-98。
    許春金、蔡田木、鄭凱寶(2012)。青少年早期偏差價值觀與偏差友伴接觸對犯罪變化影響研究。青少年犯罪防治研究期刊,4(2),109–138。
    許福生(2012)。犯罪與刑事政策學。臺北市:元照。
    郭豫珍(2004)。Hirschi 控制理論的原初觀點與發展:家庭與父母管教方式在子女非行控制上的角色。犯罪學期刊,7(1),49-80。
    陳振盛、李麗雲(2014)。青少年偏差行為與家庭。社區發展季刊,146,171-183。
    陳雅鈴(2006)。貧窮如何影響兒童。教育研究月刊,146,87-101。
    陳雅鈴(2014)。同儕社經組成對幼兒早期學習行為之影響。幼兒保育學刊,11,
    35-48。
    傅立葉、王兆慶(2011)。照顧公共化的改革與挑戰:以保母托育體系的改革為例。女學學誌:婦女與性別研究,29,79-117。
    曾浚添(2003)。少年(女)初次發生非暴力偏差或犯罪行為其演變過程及自我觀之研究。犯罪學期刊,6(1),187-228。
    曾智豐(2013)。家長社經背景對子女教養行為的影響—以個人價值觀與教育目的認知為中介變項。嘉大教育研究學刊,31,85-118。
    馮燕(2004)。托育服務-生態觀點的分析。臺北市:巨流,二版。
    馮燕(2009)。從生態觀點看幼兒托育發展。幼兒教保研究期刊,1-16。
    黃台心 (2009)。計量經濟學。臺北市:新陸,二版。
    黃芳銘、楊金寶(2002)。國中生家庭階級影響偏差行為模式之研究。師大學報,47(2),203-230。
    葉郁菁、陳乃慈、徐德成。(2013)。托育服務。新北市:心理。
    董旭英(2003)。一般化緊張理論的實驗性檢驗。犯罪學期刊,6(1),103-128。
    董旭英、王文玲(2007)。國高中生依附父母、接觸偏差同儕、傳統價值觀念與偏差行為的關聯性之差異性研究。犯罪學期刊,10(2),29-48。
    董旭英、張楓明、李威辰(2003)。青少年犯罪與偏差行為理論。載於齊力、董旭英(主編),台灣青少年偏差行為之剖析( 31-52頁)。高雄市:復文。
    劉仁文(譯)(2004)。理論犯罪學:從現代到後現代(原作者:Wayne Morrison)。北京:法律出版社(原著出版年:1995)。
    劉孟奇、盧敬植(2011)。所得分配不均與犯罪:台灣縣市動態追蹤資料分析。經濟論文叢刊,39(2),243-276。
    劉毓秀(2011)。北歐普及照顧予充分就業政策及其決策機制的台灣轉化。女學學誌:婦女與性別研究,29,1-77。

    英文文獻
    Aaltonen, M., Macdonald, J. M., Martikainen, P., & Kivivuori, J. (2013). Examining the generality of the unemployment crime association. Criminology, 51(3), 561-594.
    Agnew, R. L. (1992). Foundation for a General Strain Theory of Crime and Delinquency. Criminology, 30 , 47-88.
    Akers, R. L. (1973). Deviant Behavior: A Social Learning Approach. Belmont, Wadsworth: C.A.
    Anderson, T. L., & Bennett, R. R. (1996).Development, gender, and crime: The scope of the routine activities approach. Justice Quarterly, 13, 31-56.
    Barnett, W. S. , & Ackerman, D. J. (2006). Costs, benefits, and the long-term effects of preschool programs, community development. Journal of the Community Development Society, 37(2), 86-100.
    Becker, G. S. (1968).Crime and Punishment: An Economic Approach. Journal of Political Economy ,76(2),169-217.
    Blau , J. R., & Blau, P. M. (1982). The Cost of Inequality:Metropolitan Structure and Violent Crime. American Sociological Review, 47, 114-129.
    Borchorst, A., & Siim, B. (2002). The Women-Friendly Welfare States Revisited. NORA-Nordic Journal of Feminist and Gender Research, 10(2), 90-98.
    Brennan , D. & Adamson , E. (2014). Financing the Future: An equitable and sustainable approach to early childhood education and care. Australia: University of New South Wales , Social Policy Research Centre.
    Brennan-Galvin, E. (2002). Crime and Violence in an Urbanizing World. Journal of International Affairs, 56(1), 123-145.
    Buonanno, P., & Leone, L. (2006). Education and Crime: Evidence from Italian Regions. Applied Economics Letter, 13, 709-713.
    Cantor, D., & Land, K. C. (1985). Unemployment and Crime Rates in the Post-World War II United States: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis. American Sociological Review, 50(3), 317-332.
    Cao, L., & Deng, X. (1998). Shoplifting: A test of an integrated model of strain, differential association, and seduction theories. Sociology of Crime, Law, and Deviance, 1, 65-83.
    Chapple, C. L. (2005). Self-Control, Peer Relations, and Delinquency. Justice Quarterly, 22(1), 89-106.
    Child Welfare League of America. (1992). Standards of Excellence for Child Day Care Service. Washington, D.C: CWLA.
    Clark , R. D., & Shields, G. (1997). Family communication and delinquency. Adolescence, 32(125), 81-92.
    Cloward , R. A., & Ohlin, L. E. (1960). Delinquency and Opportunity: A Theory of Delinquent Gangs. New York: Free Press.
    Cohen, A. K. (1955). Delinquent Boys: The Culture of the Gang. New York: The Free Press.
    Durkheim, E. (1895). The Rules of Sociological Method . (S.A. Solovay & J.H. Mueller, trans.1938.). CA: University of Chicago press.
    Edlund, L., Li, H., Yi, J., & Zhang, J. (2007). Sex Ratios and Crime:Evidence from China’s One-Child Policy. IZA DP No.3214. http://anon-ftp.iza.org/dp3214.pdf
    Elliott , Delbert S., Ageton , S. S., & Canter , R. J. (1979). An integrated theoretical perspective on delinquent behavior. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 16 , 3-27.
    Erikson, E. H. (1968). Identity: youth and crisis. New York: Norton.
    Hirschi, T. (1969). Causes of delinquency. Berkeley: University of California Press.
    Hoffmann, J. P. (2002). A contextual analysis of differential association, social control, and strain theories of delinquency. Social Forces, 81(3), 753-785.
    Howes, C. O., & Der-Kiureghian, T. (1987). After school child care in an elementary school:Social development and continuity and complementarity of programs. The Elementary School Journal, 88, 93-103.
    https://www.sprc.unsw.edu.au/media/SPRCFile/Financing_the_Future.pdf
    Huebner, A.J., & Betts, S. C.(2002). Exploring the utility of social control theory for youth development. Youth and Society, 34(2), 123-145.
    Kelly, M. (2000). Inequality and Crime. Review of Economics and Statistics, 82(4), 530-539.
    Levitt, S. D. (1998). Why do increased arrest rates appear to reduce crime: deterrence, incapacitation, or measurement error? Economic Inquiry, 36(3), 353-372.
    Lin, M. J. (2008). Does unemployment increase crime?Evidence from U.S. data 1974-2000. Journal of Human Resources, 43(2), 413-436.
    Lin, W. H., Cochran, J. K., & Mieczkowski,T. (2011). Direct and vicarious violent victimization and juvenile delinquency: An application of general strain theory. Sociological Inquiry, 81(2), 195-222.
    Lochner, L. (2004). Education, Work and Crime: A Human Capital Approach. International Economic Review, 45, 811–844.
    Machin, Stephen, & Meghir, Costas. (2004). Crime and Economic Incentives. The Journal of Human Resources, 39(4), 958-979.
    Merton, R. (1938). Social structure and anomie. American Sociological Review, 3, 672–682.
    Messner, S. F. (1989). Economic Discrimination and Societal Homicide Rates: Further Evidence on the Cost of Inequality. American Sociological Review, 54(4), 597-611.
    Messner, S. F., Krohn, M. D.,& Liska, A. E. (1989). Prospects for synthetic theory: A consideration of macro-level criminological activity. In S. F. Messner, M. D. Krohn, & A. E Liska(Ed.), Theoretical Integration in the Study of Deviance and Crime (pp. 161-178.). NY: SUNY.
    Nomaguchi, K. M. (2006). Maternal Employment, Nonparental Care, Mother-Child Interactions, and Child Outcomes During Preschool Years. Journal of Marriage and Family, 68(5), 1341-1369.
    Nores, M. (2006). Gaps in early childhood attainment: Learning the A,B,Cs analysis of the 1998 cohort. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Columbia University.
    Parker, J. S., & Benson, M. J. (2004). Parent-adolescent relations and adolescent functioning: Self-esteem, substance abuse, and delinquency. Adolescence, 39(155), 519-530.
    Paschall, M. J., Ennett, S. T. , & Flewelling, R. L. (1996). Relationships among Family Characteristics and Violent Behavior by Black and White Male Adolescents. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 25(2), 177-197.
    Patterson, G. R., Debaryshe, B. D., & Ramsey, E. (1989). A developmental perspective on antisocial behavior. American Psychologist, 44, 329-335.
    Posner, J. K., & Vendell, D. L. (1994). Low-income children’s after-school care: Are there beneficial effects of after-school programs? Child Development, 65, 440-456.
    Qi, C. H., & Kaiser, A. P. (2003). Behavior problems of preschool children from low-income families: Review of the literature. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 23(4), 188-216.
    Raphael, S. (2004). The Socioeconomic States of Black Males: The Increasing Importance of Incarceration. Working Paper, University of California-Berkeley.
    Raphael, S.,&Winter-Ebmer, R. (2001). Identifying the effect of unemployment on crime. Journal of Law and Economics, 44(1), 259-283.
    Rebellon, C. (2002). Reconsidering the broken homes/delinquency relationship and exploring its mediating mechanism(s). Criminology, 40(1), 103-136.
    Sauvola, A., Koskinen, O., Jokelainen, J., Hakko, H., Järvelin, MR., & Räsänen, P. (2002). Family type and criminal behaviour of male offspring: the northern finland 1996 birth cohort study. The International Journal of Social Psychiatry, 48(2), 115-121.
    Shechory, M., & Laufer, A. (2011). Ideological delinquency: gender differences among Israeli youth during the withdrawal from the Gaza strip. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 55(2), 326-343.
    Sutherland, E. H. (1939). Principles of Criminology. (3rd Ed.) Chicago: Philadelphia, J.B. Lippincott company.
    Sutherland, E. H. (1940). White Collar Criminality. American Sociological Review, 4, 1-12.
    Teisman, G. R., & Klijn, Erik-Hans. (2003). Partnership Arrangements: Governmental Rhetoric or Governance Scheme?. Public Administration Review, 62(2), 197-205.
    Todd, C. M., & Deery-Schmitt, D. M. (1996). Factors affecting turnover among family child care providers: A longitudinal study. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 11, 351-376.
    Trucco, E. M., Colder, C. R., & Wieczorek, W. F. (2011). Vulnerability to peer influence: A moderated mediation study of early adolescent alcohol use initiation. Addictive Behaviors, 36(7), 729-736.
    Webber, C. (2007). Revaluating relative deprivation theory. Theoretical Criminology, 11, 97-120.
    Weinberg, B., Gould, E.,& Mustard, D. B. (2002). Crime rates and local labor market opportunities in the United States: 1979-1997. Review and Economics and Statistics, 84(1), 45-61.
    Wong, S. (2005). The effects of adolescent activities on delinquency: A differential involvement approach. Journal of Youth & Adolescence, 34(4), 321-333.
    Wright, R. T. & Decker, S. H. (1994). Burglars on the Job: Streetlife and Residential Break- Ins. Boston, Northeastern University Press.
    Yirmibesoglu, F., & Ergun, N. (2007). Property and Personal Crime on Istanbul. European Planning Studies, 15(3), 339-355.
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    行政管理碩士學程
    104921093
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G1049210931
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[行政管理碩士學程(MEPA)] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    093101.pdf1222KbAdobe PDF247View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback