数据加载中.....
|
请使用永久网址来引用或连结此文件:
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/111496
|
| 题名: | 合作式數位閱讀標註系統對於數學應用問題學習成效的影響研究
The effects of solving mathematics problems with the support of collaborative digital reading annotation system on learning performance |
| 作者: | 郭芙秀
Kuo, Fu Hsiu |
| 贡献者: | 陳志銘
Chen, Chih Ming
郭芙秀
Kuo, Fu Hsiu |
| 关键词: | 合作式數位閱讀標註系統
學習成效
學習動機
數學應用問題
Cooperative digital reading annotation system
Learning outcome
Learning motivation
Mathematical application problems |
| 日期: | 2017 |
| 上传时间: | 2017-07-31 11:11:01 (UTC+8) |
| 摘要: | 近年來隨著網路學習的發展，能夠透過網路輔以學習者進行線上合作閱讀學習的合作數位閱讀標註系統興起，並已發展出多媒體的標註模式，不但可以由學生自己針對閱讀文本進行合作閱讀標註，更可以在閱讀文本上進行標註互動討論，具有提昇閱讀理解成效的效益。而數學應用問題的閱讀理解，影響學習者對於數學應用問題的解題甚巨，但是長久以來並無好的提升數學應用問題閱讀理解策略。本研究比較採用合作數位閱讀標註系統及使用傳統同儕面對面合作學習數學應用問題的實驗組與控制組學習者，在解決數學應用問題的學習成效及學習動機上是否具有顯著差異。此外，亦探討場地獨立/場地依賴型不同認知風格及高/低不同學習能力的學習者，採用上述兩種不同學習方法進行數學應用問題學習之學習成效與學習動機是否具有顯著的差異，最後探討實驗學習者使用此合作式數位閱讀標註系統輔以數學應用問題學習之學習滿意度。
研究結果發現：（1）採用合作式數位閱讀標註系統輔以進行數學一元一次方程式應用問題學習，在學習成效與學習動機上均顯著優於傳統同儕面對面合作學習數學一元一次方程式應用問題；（2）採用合作式數位閱讀標註系統以及傳統同儕面對面合作學習輔以進行數學一元一次方程式應用問題學習的實驗組與控制組學習者，在回歸到一般學習後，實驗組在學習成效上仍顯著優於控制組學習者；（3）無論是場地獨立或場地相依認知風格學習者，採用合作式數位閱讀標註系統輔以進行數學一元一次方程式應用問題的標註學習後，在學習動機上均顯著優於採用傳統同儕面對面合作學習輔以進行數學一元一次方程式應用問題學習的控制組學習者；（4）無論是高低不同能力學習者，採用合作式數位閱讀標註系統輔以進行數學一元一次方程式應用問題的標註學習後，在學習動機上均顯著優於採用傳統同儕面對面合作學習輔以進行數學一元一次方程式應用問題學習的控制組學習者；（5）實驗組場地獨立學習者在使用合作式數位閱讀標註系統後的學習動機優於場地相依學習者；（6）實驗組高學習能力學習者在使用合作式數位閱讀標註系統後的學習動機優於低能力學習者。
綜合以上，本研究所提出採用合作數位閱讀標註系統輔以數學應用問題閱讀理解的學習模式，具有提升學習動機與閱讀理解成效的效益，可推廣至解決更複雜數學單元之閱讀理解，甚至發展為創新數學教學之翻轉教學模式。
Along with the development of web-based learning in past years, cooperative digital reading annotation systems, which could assist learners in online cooperative reading learning through the Internet, are emerged. Besides, multimedia annotation models are also developed for students, aiming at the reading texts, proceeding cooperative reading annotation as well as annotation interactive discussion on the reading texts. It presents the benefit to enhance the reading comprehension efficiency. The reading comprehension of mathematical application problems would largely affect learners’ mathematical application problem solving. However, there has not been a good strategy to enhance the reading comprehension of mathematical application problems. In comparison with the experimental group and the control group, which respectively apply the cooperative digital reading annotation system and traditional peers’ face-to-face cooperative learning to solve mathematical application problems, the differences in the learning outcome and learning motivation are discussed in this study. Furthermore, learners with field independent/field dependent cognitive styles and high/low learning abilities are preceded above two different learning approaches for learning mathematical application problems to discuss the differences in the learning outcome and learning motivation. Finally, learners learning mathematical application problems with the cooperative digital reading annotation system in the experiment are discussed the learning satisfaction.
The research findings are summarized as below. (1) Learners applying the cooperative digital reading annotation system to learn the mathematical application problems in linear equation with one unknown present better learning outcome and learning motivation than those using traditional peers’ face-to-face cooperative learning for the mathematical application problems in linear equation with one unknown. (2) The experimental group, applying the cooperative digital reading annotation system to learn mathematical application problems in linear equation with one unknown, still outperforms the experimental group, using traditional peers’ face-to-face cooperative learning, on the learning outcome after return to general learning. (3) Learners with either field independent or field dependent cognitive style present significant better learning motivation, after learning mathematical application problems in linear equation with one unknown with the cooperative digital reading annotation system, than those applying traditional peers’ face-to-face cooperative learning. (4) Learners with either high or low ability show remarkably better learning motivation, after learning mathematical application problems in linear equation with one unknown with the cooperative digital reading annotation system, than those using traditional peers’ face-to-face cooperative learning. (5) Field independent learners in the experimental group present better learning motivation than field dependent learners after using the cooperative digital reading annotation system. (6) Learners with high learning ability in the experimental group reveal better learning motivation than those with low ability after using the cooperative digital reading annotation system.
In sum, the learning model for the reading comprehension of mathematical application problems with the cooperative digital reading annotation system proposed in this study could enhance the benefits of learning motivation and reading comprehension. It could be promoted to solve the reading comprehension of more complicated mathematical units and even to become the flipped teaching model for innovative mathematics teaching. |
| 參考文獻: | 王仁佑（2014）。國中八年級學生一元二次方程式應用問題之閱讀理解及解題研究( 未出版之碩士論文 )。臺北市立大學，臺北市 。
王姿勻（2008）。國中生數學方程式文字題解題困難及迷思概念之研究。臺北科技大學技術及職業教育研究所學位論文，臺北市 。
毛國楠. (1997) 。成績回饋方式對不同能力水準國中生數學科的學習動機, 學習策略, 學習態度與學業成就之影響. 教育心理學報, (29), 117-135.
方文鋒（2009）。合作擬題教學法對國一學生在一元一次方程式解題之影響 (未出版之碩士論文) 。國立臺南大學數學教育學系，台南市。
古智勇（2003）。動畫網頁輔助學習數學幾何成效之研究─以國小六年級角柱和角錐單元為例。屏東師範學院數理教育研究所論文。
吳裕益（1987）。認知能力與認知型態個別差異現象之探討。教育學刊，7，300-253。
吳志祥、柯惠茹, &黃國禎（2011）。認知風格對學生搜尋及彙整網路資訊行為之影響。全球華人計算機教育應用學報。
吳淑珠（2010）。國小學童自我概念, 數學學習動機與數學成就的關係。國立屏東大學國民教育研究所，屏東市。
李曜丞（2007）。多媒體導向教學及戶外實體教學對不同認知風格學生學習成效之分析 (Doctoral dissertation)。國立交通大學，新竹市 。
位宇軒（2012）。探討平板電腦支援小組擬定文字題及答題活動之不同認知風格與數學應用能力學生學習成效。國立嘉義大學數位學習設計與管理學院
，嘉義市。
何宗駿（2014）。電腦支援 [創造數學] 平台之實作—以解題與擬題為例。中央大學網路學習科技研究所學位論文, 1-154。
邱上真、詹士宜、王惠川, & 吳建志（1995） 。解題歷程導向教學對國小四年級數學科低成就學生解題表現之成效研究。特殊教育與復健學報，4，75-108.
周斯畏、孫思源, & 朱四明（1999）。網路科技對教育的影響: 學習環境、學習型式、師生互動、與教學內容的探討。中華民國電腦輔助教學學會 (ICCAI) 第八屆論文集, 89.
周清壹（2004）。資訊融入自然生活科領域教學對國小學生學習動機與學習成就的影響(未出版之碩士論文)。國立台南大學自然科學教育學系教學碩士論文 ，台南市。
林清山、張景媛（1994）。國中生代數應用題教學策略效果之評估。教育心理學報，27，35-62.
林秀芩（2013）。標註系統輔助不同模糊容忍度國小學童英語閱讀之研究。國立政治大學圖書資訊在職班學位論文，臺北市 。
林雅婷（2011）。標註系統輔助提昇文言文閱讀學習成效之研究。國立政治大
學圖書資訊在職班學位論文，臺北市 。
林怡資（2014）。以ARCS動機模式與資訊科技融入國中地理科教學對國中生的學習動機與學習成就之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺中教育大學，臺中市。
林美秀（2016）。閱讀認知策略鷹架對於國中生英語閱讀理解成效之影響研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立政治大學圖書資訊在職班學位論文，臺北市 。
林建佑（2007）。認知風格對模擬學習成效及學習歷程影響之研究。國立臺灣師範大學工業科技教育學系學位論文, 1-116。
利亞蒨（2010）。網路輔助教學在國小數學學習領域學習成效, 學習態度之影響研究。國立屏東大學，屏東市。
洪維均（2015）。閱讀理解成效形成性評量預測暨回饋機制之合作閱讀標註系統對於學習成效之影響研究( 未出版之碩士論文 )。國立政治大學學位論文，臺北市 。
洪育佳（2012）。基於QR code 發展之國小圖書館利用教育學習系統對於學習成效, 動機及注意力影響之研究。國立政治大學，臺北市 。
洪裕貿（2016）。數位學習平台融入國中數學教學對學習成效，興趣及滿意度影響之研究-以均一教育平台為例。樹德科技大學資訊工程系碩士班學位論文，高雄市 。
陳志銘、韋祿恩, & 吳志豪（2011）。認知型態與標註品質對閱讀成效之影響與關聯研究: 以數位閱讀標註系統為例. 圖書與資訊學刊, (76), 1-25。
陳勇汀（2011）。合作式閱讀標註之知識萃取機制研究。國立政治大學，臺北市 。
陳姿君（2015）。合作閱讀標註系統之遊戲化激勵機制對於提升同儕互動與閱讀理解成效的影響研究( 未出版之碩士論文 )。國立政治大學圖書資訊在職班學位論文, 1-153.臺北市。
陳芳雅（2012） 。不同合作模式對國小學童閱讀學習影響之研究。國立政治大學圖書資訊在職班學位論文, 1-132. 臺北市。
陳世杰（2004） 。國小學童閱讀理解策略與數學文字題閱讀理解、數學文字題解題表現之相關研究。國立高雄師範大學學位論文，高雄市。
陳建文（2006）。不同認知風格學生接受混合式教學之學習成效分析研究─ 以高中 [電腦網路] 教學為例。臺灣師範大學工業教育學系學位論文, 1-105。
陳婉如（2015）。數位科技改善國中生數學學習滿意度之研究。中華大學工業管理學系碩士班學位論文, 1-105。
曾振富（2001） 。利用網路科技輔助國小自然科 [教] 與 [學] 之研究: 以台北市中正河濱公園自然生態為例。國立臺北教育大學課程與教學研究所學位論文，1-223，臺北市。
張逸婷（2002）。電腦學習網站輔助國小學生數學學習之學習成就、數學態度及電腦態度之相關研究。屏東大學數理教育研究所學位論文，屏東縣。
張祐瑄（2010）。閱讀理解能力與數學能力對小學六年級低成就學生在數學文字題解題表現之影響。臺灣師範大學教育心理與輔導學系學位論文，臺北市。
張韶瑩（2003）。高雄地區國二學生數學認知風格與學習成就相關研究。未出版之碩士論文，國立高雄師範大學數學系碩士論文，高雄市。
康雅芳（2011）。國小五年級學童認知風格, 數學態度與數學解題表現之關係研究。國立高雄師範大學，高雄市 。
許瑛玿、廖桂菁（2002）。情境式網路輔助學習環境之研發與實踐。科學教育學刊，10(2) ，157-178.
黃健泉（2012）。資訊科技融入教學對國中學生自然科學習動機與學習成就的影響－以磁場與電流磁效應單元為例。國立彰化師範大學碩士論文，彰化市。
廖碧珠（2006）。合作學習對國中一年級學生的數學態度與學習成就之影響。 ( 未出版之碩士論文 )。國立彰化師範大學科學教育研究所數理教學碩士班碩士論文，彰化市。
廖靜玫（2001）。STS教學與認知風格對國小學童自然科學習之研究。市立台北師範學院科學教育研究所碩士論文，臺北市。
蔡永巳、陳瓊森（1998）。國二理化科試行合作學習之合作式行動研究。科學教育, (8), 101-117。
劉永政 （2015）。兩種不同表徵對於國二學生數學解題之探討─ 以 [一元二次方程式] 為例。國立中山大學教育研究所學位論文，高雄市。
劉勝鈺、林珊如（2002）。使用資訊科技學習數學: 以網路同儕互評為例 (Doctoral dissertation)，國立交通大學學位論文，新竹市。
蕭翠玲（2009）。應用資訊科技輔助數學教學之合作學習成效研究。國立高雄師範大學，高雄市 。
謝君琳（2003）。合作學習對國小四年級數學低成就學生數學學習與同儕互動之影響( 未出版之碩士論文 )。國立彰化師範大學特殊教育研究所，彰化市。
Bateman, S., Brooks, C., Mccalla, G., & Brusilovsky, P. (2007). Applying collaborative tagging to e-learning. In Proceedings of the 16th international world wide web conference (WWW2007).
Balkcom, S. (1992). Cooperative Learning. Education Research Consumer Guide.
Chen, C. M., & Chen, F. Y. (2014). Enhancing digital reading performance with a collaborative reading annotation system. Computers & Education, 77, 67-81.
Chen, C.-M., Wang, J.-Y., & Chen, Y.-C. (2013). Facilitating English-language reading performance by a digital reading annotation system with self-regulated learning mechanisms. Educational Technology & Society, 17(1), 102-114.
Chuang, Y. R. (1999). Teaching in a multimedia computer environment: A study of the effects of learning style, gender, and math achievement. Interactive multimedia electronic journal of computer-enhanced learning, 1(1), 1999.
Chen, C., & Stevenson, H. W. (1995). Motivation and mathematics achievement: a comparative study of Asian‐American, Caucasian‐American, and East Asian high school students. Child development, 66(4), 1215-1234.
Davis, J. R., & Huttenlocher, D. P. (1995). Shared annotation for cooperative learning. In The first international conference on Computer support for collaborative learning (pp. 84-88). L. Erlbaum Associates Inc..
Davidson N., & Kroll, D. L (1991). An overview of research on cooperative learning related to mathematics.Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 22, 362–365.
Davis, J., & Huttenlocher, D. (1995). The CoNote System for shared annotations. Cornell University, Dept. of Computer Science.
Estellés, E., González, F., & del Moral, E. (2010). Social bookmarking tools as facilitators of learning and research collaborative processes: The Diigo case. Interdisciplinary Journal of E-Learning & Learning Objects, 6.
Evans, C., Waring, M., Zhang, L., Sternberg, R., & Rayner, S. (2011). Applications of styles in educational instruction and assessment. Handbook of Intellectual Styles: preferences in Cognition, Learning and Thinking, 295-327.
Gomita. (2008). ScrapBook. Retrieved from https://addons.mozilla.org/zh-TW/firefox/ addon/scrapbook/
Huang, W.-C. (2014). The effects of multimedia annotation and summary writing on Taiwanese EFL students` reading comprehension. The Reading Matrix, 14(1), 136-153.
Hwang, W. Y., Chen, N. S., Shadiev, R., & Li, J. S. (2011). Effects of reviewing annotations and homework solutions on math learning achievement. British Journal of Educational Technology, 42(6), 1016-1028.
Hilke, E. (1990). Cooperative learning. Decatur, IL: Phi Delta Kappa.
Handal, B., & Herrington, A. (2004). On being dependent or independent in computer based learning environments. E-Journal of Instructional Science and 116 Technology, 7(2), n2.
Hurme, T. R., & Järvelä, S. (2005). Students’ activity in computer-supported collaborative problem solving in mathematics. International Journal of Computers for mathematical learning, 10(1), 49-73.
KELLER, John M. Using the ARCS motivational process in computer‐based instruction and distance education. New directions for teaching and learning, 1999, 1999.78: 37-47.
Jan, J.-C., Chen, C.-M., & Huang, P.-H. (2015). Enhancement of digital reading performance by using a novel web-based collaborative reading annotation system with two quality annotation filtering mechanisms. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2015.09.006
Koivunen, M. R. (2005, May). Annotea and semantic web supported collaboration. In Invited talk at workshop on user aspects of the semantic web (User-SWeb) at European semantic web conference (pp. 5-16).
Kebritchi, M. (2008). Effects of a computer game on mathematics achievement and class motivation: An experimental study. University of Central Florida.
Lazakidou, G., & Retalis, S. (2010). Using computer supported collaborative learning strategies for helping students acquire self-regulated problem-solving skills in mathematics. Computers & Education, 54(1), 3-13.
MacGregor, S. K., Shapiro, J. Z., & Niemiec, R. (1988). Effects of a computer-augmented learning environment on math achievement for students with differing cognitive style. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 4(4), 453-465.
Messick, S. (1984). The nature of cognitive styles: Problems and promise in educational practice. Educational psychologist, 19(2), 59-74.
Marshall, C. C. (1998, May). Toward an ecology of hypertext annotation. In Proceedings of the ninth ACM conference on Hypertext and hypermedia: links,objects, time and space---structure in hypermedia systems: links, objects, time.and space---structure in hypermedia systems (pp. 40-49). New York: ACM.
Novák, V., Perfilieva, I., & Mockor, J. (2012). Mathematical principles of fuzzy logic (Vol. 517). Springer Science & Business Media.
Nattiv, A. (1994). Helping behaviors and math achievement gain of students using cooperative learning. The Elementary School Journal, 94(3), 285-297.
Nokelainen, P., Miettinen, M., Kurhila, J., Floréen, P., & Tirri, H. (2005). A shared document‐based annotation tool to support learner‐centred collaborative learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 36(5), 757-770.
Olsen, D.R., Taufer, T., and Fails, J.A. (2004). ScreenCrayons: Annotating Anything. UIST 2004.pp 165-174.
Polya, G. (1945). How to solve it . New York: Dou bleday.
Roll, I., Aleven, V., McLaren, B. M., & Koedinger, K. R. (2011). Improving students’ help-seeking skills using metacognitive feedback in an intelligent tutoring system. Learning and Instruction, 21(2), 267-280.
Reisa, Z. A. (2010). Computer supported mathematics with GeoGebra. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 9, 1449-1455.
Rich, Y. (1993). Education and instruction in heterogeneous classes . Springfield, IL: Thomas.
Shaffer, D. W. (1997, December). Design, collaboration, and computation: The design studio as a model for computer supported collaboration in mathematics. In Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on Computer support for collaborative learning (pp. 253-258). International Society of the Learning Sciences.
Singh, K., Granville, M., & Dika, S. (2002). Mathematics and science achievement: Effects of motivation, interest, and academic engagement. The Journal of Educational Research, 95(6), 323-332.
Su, A. Y., Yang, S. J., Hwang, W. Y., & Zhan, J. (2010). A Web 2.0-based collaborative annotation system for enhancing knowledge sharing in collaborative learning environments. Computers & Education, 55(2), 752-766.
Slavin, R. E. (1990). Ability grouping in secondary schools: A response to Hallinan. Review of Educational Research, 60(3), 505-507.
Sharan, S. (1980). Cooperative learning in small groups: Recent methods and effects on achievement, attitudes, and ethnic relations. Review of Educational Research, 50, 2 41-271.
Slavin, R. E., & Davis, N. (2006). Educational psychology: Theory and practice. Boston: Pearson/Allyn & Bacon.
Tella, A. (2007). The impact of motivation on student’s academic achievement and learning outcomes in mathematics among secondary school students in Nigeria. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 3(2), 149-156.
Vaidya, S., & Chansky, N. M. (1980). Cognitive development and cognitive style as factors in mathematics achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 72(3), 326.
Witkin, H. A. (1979). Socialization, culture and ecology in the development of group and sex differences in cognitive style. Human Development, 22(5), 358-372.
Witkin, H. A., Moore, C. A., Goodenough, D. R., & Cox, P. W. (1975). Field‐dependent and field‐independent cognitive styles and their educational implications. ETS Research Report Series, 1975(2), 1-64.
Witkin, H. A., Moore, C. A., Goodenough, D. R., & Cox, P. W. (1977). Field-dependent and field-independent cognitive styles and their educational implications. Review of Educational Research, 47(1), 1-64. doi: 10.2307/1169967
Yee, K. P. (2002). CritLink: advanced hyperlinks enable public annotation on the web. Computer supported cooperative work (CSCW). |
| 描述: | 碩士
國立政治大學
圖書資訊學數位碩士在職專班
104913019 |
| 資料來源: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0104913019 |
| 数据类型: | thesis |
| 显示于类别: | [圖書資訊與檔案學研究所] 學位論文
|
文件中的档案:
| 档案 |
大小 | 格式 | 浏览次数 |
|---|
| 301901.pdf | 2070Kb | Adobe PDF2 | 51 | 检视/开启 |
|
在政大典藏中所有的数据项都受到原著作权保护.
|
