English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 112704/143671 (78%)
Visitors : 49748667      Online Users : 824
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/113646


    Title: 利已或利他：民眾於2012年總統選舉中重分配議題的立場
    Egoism or Altruism: Citizens` Attitude toward Redistribution in the 2012 Presidential Election
    Authors: 張傳賢
    Chang, Alex C. H.
    Keywords: 重分配;貧富不均;理性選擇;政黨認同;公共財供給
    redistribution;income inequality;rational choice;party identification;public goods provision
    Date: 2014-11
    Issue Date: 2017-10-16 17:08:44 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 有別於以往選舉中以族群、統獨及經濟發展為選舉競爭的主軸，在2012年總統選舉中，社會正義與貧富不均的議題成為藍綠的主要政見與政策攻防的焦點。本文同時從政治經濟學理論與政黨功能的角度出發，解讀民眾在縮小貧富差距立場上的差異。利用TEDS2012的資料，我們發現人們對於家庭與總體經濟的展望、公共財提供意願與政黨認同的方向與強度，對於其重分配的立場都有顯著的影響。本文進一步利用結構方程式模型發現，兩岸交流雖然不致於直接影響人們在縮小貧富差距的立場，但是藉由影響民眾對於未來經濟狀況的展望，也使其間接左右了民眾在重分配議題上的立場。
    Unlike conventional presidential elections in which ethnic identity, unification and independence, and economic development were the core issues of political competitions, in the 2012 presidential election, the issue of social justice and redistribution firstly was included in the candidates` platforms. This article investigates the question of redistribution from the theoretical perspectives and political competition, and explains the variation in the voters` opinions on this issue. By incorporating the TEDS 2012 data with structural equation modeling, we find that the theories of classical political economy, the supply theory of public goods, and party identity all provide explanations for this issue. In addition, we also find that although the cross-strait economic and trade exchange does not directly influence people`s opinions toward redistribution, nevertheless, it impacts their attitudes toward their future household income, and indirectly affects their standpoints on the redistributive issues.
    Relation: 選舉研究 , 21(2) , 43-80
    Data Type: article
    DOI 連結: http://dx.doi.org/10.6612%2ftjes.2014.21.02.43-80
    DOI: 10.6612/tjes.2014.21.02.43-80
    Appears in Collections:[選舉研究 TSSCI] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    21(2)(043-080).pdf2054KbAdobe PDF2410View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback