English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 110182/141115 (78%)
Visitors : 46766643      Online Users : 368
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/114338


    Title: 選舉危機情境分類之探討
    Responding to Political Crisis during Campaigns: A Classification of Political Crisis Situations
    Authors: 姚惠忠
    汪睿祥
    Yao, Hui-Chung
    Keywords: 危機反應策略;危機傳播;形象修護;選舉危機情境
    political crisis situations in campaigns;response strategies to crisis;image repairing;crisis communication
    Date: 2008-11
    Issue Date: 2017-11-02 16:55:08 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 本研究以2005年至2006年間,台灣地區地方首長選舉九位候選人,24個遭指控或質疑的危機案例爲研究對象,以因素分析與內容分析法,依選民對危機事件之厭惡程度與證據揭露程度兩變項,建構候選人競選危機之情境類型,並探討不同危機情境下,候選人傾向使用的反應策略。
    本研究發現,選民厭惡程度最高的危機類型是貪腐或施政問題,其次是政黨或競選策略,最不在乎的是候選人身心健康或選舉技術型危機。本研究也發現,在「厭惡程度高、證據揭露程度高」情境,候選人傾向使用「反擊對手」策略;在「厭惡程度高、證據揭露程度低」情境,候選人傾向使用「否認」策略;在「厭惡程度中、證據揭露程度高」情境,候選人傾向使用「降低危機衝擊性」策略。本研究的發現能做爲進一步建構選舉危機傳播理論的基礎。
    The purpose of this study is to construct a classification of political crisis situations that candidates face and to discuss the situation-response relationship by exploring candidates` probable response strategies with respect to every type of situations of political crises during campaigns. Data is collected through 24 individual cases which present nine candidates subject to public accusations and suspicions in Taiwan`s local political elections during 2005-2006. Content analysis and factor analysis are both used to analyze the data based on two variables: electorates` degree of antipathy to the crisis events and the degree of evidence disclosure.
    It is found that in ”high antipathy and high disclosure of evidence”, ”attack accuser” is candidates` most probable response; in ”high antipathy and low disclosure of evidence”, ”denial” is candidates` most probable choose; in ”middle antipathy and high disclosure of evidence”, candidates tend to ”reduce offensiveness of crisis”.
    Relation: 選舉研究 , 15(2) , 67-90
    Data Type: article
    DOI 連結: http://dx.doi.org/10.6612%2ftjes.2008.15.02.67-90
    DOI: 10.6612/tjes.2008.15.02.67-90
    Appears in Collections:[選舉研究 TSSCI] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    15(2)(067-090).pdf1393KbAdobe PDF2228View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback