English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 109952/140887 (78%)
Visitors : 46326072      Online Users : 1124
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/114442


    Title: 網路之刑事追訴——科技與法律的較勁
    網路之刑事追訴——科技與法律的較勁
    Authors: 王士帆
    Wang, Shih-Fan
    Keywords: 基本權;網路犯罪偵查;網路電話;雲端搜索;秘密線上搜索
    Basic Right;Investigation in Internet;Internet Phone;Cloud Search;Hidden Online Search (verdeckte Online- Durchsuchung)
    Date: 2016-06
    Issue Date: 2017-11-07 14:53:57 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 於今日數位資訊社會,對抗網路犯罪成為刑法與相關刑事訴訟法的重大議題。資訊科技為法律帶來多方面挑戰。當網路成為犯罪工具,國家何嘗不想利用網路追訴犯罪。網路之刑事追訴正是科技與法律的一種較勁。科技固然一日千里,但網路偵查措施不管多精密,終究應回歸基本權干預的審查體系。對於電腦科技犯罪之蒐證,無論是雲端搜索、秘密線上搜索,審查其干預法律依據將是重心所在。因此,探求現行法是否有適當的干預授權基礎,成為網路追訴的首要課題。
    Information Technology has brought many challenges to the law. The fight against cybercrime in the substantive criminal law and the corresponding rules of criminal procedure are significant issues in today`s digital information society. The Internet has become a tool for criminals. Then why are countries worldwide still hesitant in using the Internet to track and prosecute crimes? The investigation in internet serves as a type of confrontation between technology and law. Although technology advances at dizzying speeds, online detection measures-no matter how carefully designed-should be based on a scrutiny system underpinned by basic rights. The collection of evidence for cybercrimes-regardless of cloud searches or hidden online searches- must be based around a review of laws violated. As a result, whether existing laws have a proper and legal basis for intervention has become the most important issue in prosecuting online criminals.
    Relation: 政大法學評論, 145, 339-390
    Data Type: article
    DOI 連結: http://dx.doi.org/10.3966/102398202016060145006
    DOI: 10.3966/102398202016060145006
    Appears in Collections:[政大法學評論 TSSCI] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    145-6.pdf2014KbAdobe PDF2451View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback