English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 111300/142216 (78%)
Visitors : 48288384      Online Users : 947
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/114479


    Title: 國會改造之選舉制度方案比較
    Comparing Electoral Systems for Congressional Reform
    Authors: 蔡學儀
    Tsai, William
    Keywords: 選舉制度;選舉改革;單一選區兩票并立制;單一選區兩票聯立制;中選區兩票制;開放式名單比例代表制
    Electoral System;Electoral Reform;Single-Member Constituency Parallel System;Mixed-Member Proportional;Medium-Size Constituency Parallel System;Open-list Proportional Representation
    Date: 2002-11
    Issue Date: 2017-11-08 11:31:16 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 最近幾年選舉改革話題炙手可熱，尤其去年五月五日陳總統於第五次政府改造會議後，宣佈推動立法委員自第六屆起將改由單一選區兩票並立制產生，引起朝野熱烈討論，更一度讓整個話題推到高峰。即使選舉改革在我國已經討論將近七年，但對於相關替代方案的研究和比較分析仍不多見，為充分了解不同替代方案的政治效應、改革效果以及可行性，本文嘗試就目前朝野各黨所提出的四項主要替代方案：單一選區兩票並立制、單一選區兩票聯立制、中選區兩票制和開放式名單比例代表制，針對「滿足選民改革期許」、「穩定憲政運作效果」、「既得利益者接受程度」、「政黨選擇偏好之共識」、「選區劃分之可行性」、「制度是否簡單易行」等深入比較分析，以充分了解這些不同選舉方案在不同因素下的影響和效應。
    Calling for electoral reform is particularly harsh in the recent years, especially after President Chen announced to adopt Single-Member Constituency Parallel System for the forthcoming general elections after the Conference for Governmental Reform on 5th May 2002. Unfortunately, comparison studies on alternative methods are still few. In order to advance understandings on concerned circumstances, this article tries to analyse and compare political consequences, reform effects and feasibilities of major alternative systems, i. e. Single-Member Constituency Parallel System, Mixed-Member Proportional (MMP), Medium-Sized Constituency Parallel System, and Open-list Proportional Representation, called by different parties in the congress.
    Relation: 選舉研究 , 9(2) , 117-150
    Data Type: article
    DOI link: http://dx.doi.org/10.6612%2ftjes.2002.09.02.117-150
    DOI: 10.6612/tjes.2002.09.02.117-150
    Appears in Collections:[Journal of Electoral studies] Journal Articles

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    9(2)(117-150).pdf2087KbAdobe PDF2390View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback