English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 111144/142064 (78%)
Visitors : 48089727      Online Users : 1014
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/119951


    Title: 參與式預算之議員建議款模式研究─ 以新北市汐止區為例
    A study on the councilors suggestive fund for participatory budgeting: A case of the Xizhi District in New Taipei City
    Authors: 廖先翔
    Liao, Hsien-Hsiang
    Contributors: 詹中原
    Jan, Chung-Yuang
    廖先翔
    Liao, Hsien-Hsiang
    Keywords: 參與式預算
    議員建議款
    審議式民主
    公民參與
    Participatory budgeting
    The councilors suggestive fund
    Deliberative democracy
    Citizen participation
    Date: 2018
    Issue Date: 2018-09-03 15:59:13 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 參與式預算的概念源自審議式民主的公民參與,實踐由下而上的政府治理理念,由政府提供公民參與預算規劃及支出的有效管道,使公民與政府決策產生連結。參與式預算於2015年起在臺灣各地興起一陣熱潮,而由公家機關舉辦並完成的首例即在新北市,其主要的推動者為新北市的議員,透過參與式預算,讓議員建議款得以有效妥適運用,達到公平及公益性,符合在地居民需求。
    本研究係針對議員建議款模式的參與式預算運作模式進行研究,藉以了解現行實務推動的實際情形,並從推動者的角度以及審議式民主、公民參與理論來探究議員建議款之參與式預算於我國之發展可能。本研究發現我國參與式預算下不同模式的優劣、推行者的動機與利弊、協力者人格特質的影響、推行的障礙以及深化民主的成效,因此本研究建議:首先,參與式預算提案及投票辦法的創新,有助達到公平性及創造更多彈性;再者,成立專責的推動機構,可降低推動者行政承載力的負擔,亦可提升民眾參與的廣度;最後,提出不同模式參與式預算的結合概念,將各種模式截長補短,提出一種新的視角思考模式,供後續研究我國參與式預算之專業人員參考。
    The concept of Participatory Budgeting stems from the consideration of democratic citizen participation and the practice of bottom-up government governance. The government provides an effective channel for citizens to participate in budget planning and spending, linking citizens to government decisions. Participatory Budgeting has starting a boom in Taiwan since 2015, the first case organized and completed by the public authorities is in New Taipei City, and its main promoter is the councilor of New Taipei City. Through participative budgeting, the councilor’s suggestive fund can be effectively and properly applied to achieve fairness and public welfare, and meet the needs of local residents.
    This research is based on the participative budgeting operation mode from the mode of the councilors suggestive fund, in order to understand the actual situation promoted by the current practice. From the perspective of promoters and the theory of civic citizen participation and deliberate democracy theory to explores the possible development of participative budgeting for councilors suggestive fund in Taiwan. This research finds the advantages and disadvantages of Taiwan’s participative budgeting in different models, including promoter`s motivations and pros and cons, the influence of personality traits, barriers to implementation and the effectiveness of deepening democracy. Therefore this research suggests: The establishment of a dedicated promotion agency can reduce the burden of facilitator`s administrative capacity and increase the breadth of public participation. At last, proposing a combination of different modes of participative budgeting, to round off the various mode, and produce a new perspective thinking mode for the follow-up study of the professionals participative budgeting in Taiwan.
    Reference: 宋威穎、吳偉寧(2016)。地方政府辦理參與式預算之觀察與省思-以台中市中區參與式預算為例。2016 台灣公共行政與公共事務系所聯合會(TASPAA)年會暨「台灣公共行政的自省與躍升」研討會(5月27日),臺北。
    林國明(2015)。參與式預算的操作程序與國外經驗。鄭麗君(編),參與式預算: 咱的預算咱來決定。臺北:財團法人青平台基金會。
    胡幼慧編(2008)。質性研究-理論、方法及本土女性研究實例。臺北:巨流圖書公司。
    徐仁輝(2014)。參與式預算制度的理論與實踐。財稅研究,43(2),1-11。
    徐斯儉、吳建忠(2016)。為窮人賦權:帶著台灣問題意識,直擊紐約市「參與式預算」,2018年7月18日,取自https://theinitium.com/article/20160421-taiwan-participatory-budgeting/。
    張傑謙(2016)。考察美國地方政府實施參與式預算制度情形及會計資訊揭露之現況心得分享,2018年7月18日,取自http://www.openreport.taipei.gov.tw/OpenFront/report/show_file.jsp?sysId=C105AW708&fileNo=2。
    郭銘峰(2018)。地方治理參與式預算:各國經驗回顧與展望。即將收錄於當代治理新趨勢(二):理論與個案(第11章)。臺北:國立空中大學。
    陳敦源(2018)。台灣議員回饋金制度因參與式預算而漂白了?,2018年7月25日,取自https://www.facebook.com/donyun.chen。
    陳朝政、楊三東(2012)。審議式民主在民主教育的實踐。高雄師大學報,32,47-70。
    陳曉宜(2005)。報社記者抵抗資源之研究。國立政治大學傳播學院碩士在職專班學位論文,未出版,臺北市。
    黃瑞琴(1997)。質的教育研究方法。新北市:心理出版社。
    新北市政府(2016)。2018年2月23日,新北市參與式預算簡介,取自:http://www.pb.ntpc.gov.tw/%E5%8F%83%E8%88%87%E5%BC%8F%E9%A0%90%E7%AE%97%E7%B0%A1%E4%BB%8B.html。
    萬毓澤(2013)。「參與式預算」的興衰浮沉:巴西榆港的故事,2018年2月23日,取自:https://twstreetcorner.org/2013/06/17/wanyuze/。
    萬毓澤(2016)。台灣推動「參與式預算」的反省與前瞻,2018年7月18日,取自https://theinitium.com/article/20160310-opinion-participatorybudgeting/。
    潘淑滿(2003)。質性研究-理論與應用。臺北:心理出版社。
    蘇彩足(2015)。政府實施參與式預算之可行性評估。國家發展委員會委託研究報告,未出版。
    蘇彩足(2017)。公部門推動參與式預算之經驗與省思。文官制度季刊,9(2),1-22。
    嚴祥鸞(1996)。參與觀察法。胡幼慧(主編),質性研究:理論、方法及本土女性研究實例 (195-222)。臺北:巨流出版社。
    Arnstein, S.R.(1969).A Ladder of Citizen Participation. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 35(4), 216-224.
    Elster, J. (1997). The market and the forum: Three varieties of political theory. In J. Bohman & W. Rehg (Eds.), Deliberative Democracy: Essays on Reason and Politics (pp.3-33). Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
    Lerner, J. and Secondo, D. (2012). By the People, For the People: Participatory Budgeting from the Bottom Up in North America. Journal of Public Deliberation, 8(2), Article 2.
    Lerner, J. and Antieau, M. W. (2010). Chicago’s $1.3 Million Experiment in Democracy. Yes Magazine. http://www.yesmagazine.org/people-power/chicagos-1.3-million-experiment-in-democracy. Date:2018/02/25
    Marquetti, Adalmir. 2009. The Redistributive Effects of the Participatory Budgeting in Porto Alegre. In Patricio Silva and Herwig Cleuren (Eds.) Widening Democracy: Citizens and Participatory Schemes in Brazil and Chile (pp. 99-114). Leiden: Brill.
    Participatory Budgeting in Chicago (PBC) Steering Committee (2014). Participatory Budgeting in Chicago 2014-2015 Rulebook. Participatory Budgeting Chicago Official Website. https://drive.google.com/file/d/0ByyyNDeWq2vNNFEwdUw3T3RJ UVE/view?pli=1 . Date:2018/02/25
    Participatory Budgeting New York City Council (2013). Participatory Budgeting in New York City 2013-2014 Rulebook. Participatory Budgeting New York City Official Website. http://www.participatorybudgeting.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/07 /PBNYC-2013-2014-Rulebook-easy-print-version.pdf. Date:2018/02/27
    Sangha, S. (2012). Putting in their 2 Cents: For Some New Yorkers, A Grand Experiment in Participatory Budgeting. The New York Times. http://www.nytimes.com/2012/04/01/nyregion/for-some-new-yorker s-a-grand-experiment-in-participatory-budgeting. html?pagewanted=all&_r=0. Date:2018/02/27
    Sintomer, Y., Herzberg, C., & Röcke, A.(2008). Participatory Budgeting in Europe: Potentials and Challenges. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 32(1), 164-178.
    Stewart, D.W. and Shamdasani, P.N. (1990). Focus Groups: Theory and Practice. Sage.
    Summers, N. (2010). Chicago’s Participatory Budgeting Experiment. Area Chicago. http://areachicago.org/chicagos-participatory-budgeting-ex periment/. Date:2018/02/26
    Wampler, B. (2007). A Guide to Participatory Budgeting. In Anwar Shah (Ed). Participatory Budgeting. Washington, D.C: The World Bank.
    Wichowsky, A., & Moynihan, D. P.(2008). Measuring How Administration Shapes Citizenship: A Policy Feedback Perspective on Performance Management. Public Administration Review, 908-920.
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    行政管理碩士學程
    105921081
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0105921081
    Data Type: thesis
    DOI: 10.6814/THE.NCCU.MEPA.047.2018.F09
    Appears in Collections:[行政管理碩士學程(MEPA)] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    108101.pdf3130KbAdobe PDF233View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback