English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 109950/140901 (78%)
Visitors : 46022392      Online Users : 810
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/120301


    Title: 陸資赴臺技術取得方式之影響因素:進入模式所扮演之角色
    The Impacts of Technology Acquisition Mode of Mainland China Enterprises in Taiwan: The Role of Entry Mode
    Authors: 蔡雨秦
    Tsai, Yu-Chin
    Contributors: 翁永和
    蔡雨秦
    Tsai, Yu-Chin
    Keywords: 技術取得方式
    進入模式
    獨資模式
    合資模式
    Date: 2018
    Issue Date: 2018-10-01 12:17:57 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 過往對於外資企業進入模式、技術取得方式相關之理論均有許多實證研 究。有鑑於我國與中國大陸政治特殊性,本研究藉由相關之對外直接投資理論 及實證文獻資料,以陸資事業來臺投資為例,探討跨國企業技術取得方式之影 響因素,如:公司規模大小、技術所需能力、開拓兩岸市場、建構分工體系、網絡群聚效應等,並試圖進一步探討在不同進入模式與技術取得方式之影響因 素交互作用下,對於技術取得方式之影響效果及變化,為本研究欲探討之目的。
    本研究利用經濟部投資審議委員會《陸資投資事業營運狀況調查表-2013 年》問卷資料,檢視自投資廠商屬性、投資誘因動機、投資環境特性等三個構 面與技術取得方式間之關係,以及探究上開各構面要素與不同進入模式相互作 用後,影響其技術取得方式之程度。另本研究係運用Probit Model迴歸實證分 析企業技術取得方式之影響因素,並根據其實證結果作出結論與建議,其研究結果發現,公司規模大小、公司股權型態、開拓兩岸市場、建構分工體系、群聚網絡效應為陸資赴臺投資選擇技術取得方式之重要影響因素;其次,加入進入模式作為交叉項後,實證結果亦說明不同進入模式對於陸資企業選擇技術取 得方式會有所影響,亦即陸資企業採獨資模式進入我國市場時,相對於陸資母 公司而言,在臺子公司規模愈大、技術所需能力愈高,以及欲偕同主要顧客或 上下游廠商至我國設立投資據點之情形下,獲取技術選擇內部自行研發方式為顯著負向關係。
    Reference: 中文部分
    方世杰(1996),《企業技術交易模式影響因素之探討》,臺灣大學商學研究所博士論文。
    方世杰與林麗娟(2004),「參與科技專案廠商之組織學習、社會資本與技術移轉之實證研究」,《管理學報》,22(3),295-315。
    王健全、朱磊與童振源(2015),「2015年投資臺灣藍皮書」,新北:博誌文化。
    司徒達賢、賴士葆、洪鉛財(1994),「技術取得策略影響因素分析」,《產業科技研究發展理論文集第四冊》,臺北:經濟部技術處,7-8。
    李文瑞(2002),「從交易成本、資源基礎與行為決策理論探討中小企業技術取得模式之影響因素」,《管理學報》,19(5),873-900。
    李國鼎(1978),「中美兩國間工業技術的雙向交流」,《自由中國之工業》,50(2),2-5。
    何楓、祝麗雲、徐曉甯與孫麗雅(2013),「FDI來源及方式對我國企業技術效率優化影響研究」,《華東經濟管理》,27(9),44-48。
    林惠玲、葉日崧(2008),「從區位選擇的效果看臺灣廠商的全球佈局」,《全球運籌、策略聯盟與東協效應—臺日商大陸與越南投資跨國比較》,臺北:國立政治大學國際關係研究中心。
    林惠玲(2009),「臺灣製造業對外投資、全球化與產業升級」,臺北:行政院主計處委託研究。
    邱奕嘉與曾為國(2014),「技術相關程度對技術併購影響之研究」,《管理與系統》,21(2),187-222。
    邱美雅(2014),《合作研發策略對母公司產品品質與技術之影響-台商對中國大陸之實證研究》,臺灣大學經濟學研究所碩士論文。
    胡名雯與薛琦(1997)「中小企業生產特性與效率之研究-臺灣製造業之分析」《經濟論文叢刊》,25(1),1-26。
    高子荃、方世杰與林楚雄(2006),「技術取得模式與經營績效之實證研究:考慮廠商的決策影響」,《科技管理學刊》,11(4),121-156。
    高長(2001),「製造業赴大陸投資經營當地化及其對臺灣經濟之影響」,《經濟情勢暨評論季刊》,7(1),138-173。
    高長與陳威如(1998),「台商赴大陸投資所有權進入模式決定因素的分析」,《管理學報》,15(3),393-418。
    高長與洪嘉瑜(2006),「台商在大陸投資的產業類別與績效表現」,台商
    大陸投資東莞與昆山經驗學術研討會,2006 年 11 月 26 日,臺北:
    政治大學國關中心。
    郭春麗(2012),《影響海外投資廠商研發投入之決定因素》,國立政治大學行政管理碩士學程碩士論文。
    張昭仁(1994),「研究發展管理理論與案例」,臺北:翰蘆圖書出版社。
    陳松柏(2001),「以交易成本理論探討我國廠商技術取得方式之研究--以高科技產業之實證」,《管理與資訊學報》,6,43-71。
    許國崢與林傑毓(2006),「臺灣資訊產業技術取得之影響因素」,《南開學報》,4(1),13-24。
    莊正民與方世杰(2001),「企業跨國引進模式、影響因素與學習機蕭關係之研究-交易成本與知識基礎理論之觀點」,《管理評論》,20(1),35-64。
    馮震宇(1995),「技術移轉之類型及比較」,《工業財產與標準》,94-108。
    楊宜興與戴彩惠(2015),「創新來源、創新產出與公司績效間關係之探討:臺灣半導體產業之實證研究」,《創新與管理》,11(3),28-54。
    溫芳宜、劉孟俊、劉柏定與鍾富國(2014),「2014年僑外及陸資投資事業營運狀況調查分析報告」,臺北:經濟部投資審議委員會。
    薛琦(1987),「我國產業的技術移轉與技術發展」,《中美技術季刊》,32(4),89-90。
    劉孟俊與陳信宏(2007),「跨國研發網絡與研發國際化:海外子公司的分析觀點」《臺大管理論叢》,18(1),211-238。
    蔡沐學與張國益(2014),「臺商對外投資在勞動成本及市場區位選擇的比較-臺灣主要製造業之印證」,《經濟預測與政策》,43(2),83-122。
    蔡明田、陳忠仁與陳永明(2003),「技術取得模式之交易情境模型與績效關係之實證研究」,《產業論壇》,5(2),117-150。
    籃國仁(2013),《影響對外投資廠商國內外研發支出配置的決定因素─以台商赴大陸投資為例》,國立政治大學行政管理碩士學程碩士論文。

    英文部分
    Agarwal, S. and S. N. Ramaswami (1992), “Choice of Foreign Market Entry Mode: Impact of Ownership, Location and Internalization Factors,” Journal of International Business Studies, 23(1), 1-27.
    Anderson, E. and H. Gatignon (1986), “Modes of Foreign Entry: A Transaction Cost Analysis and Propositions,” Journal of International Business Studies, 17(3), 1-26.
    Barney, J. B. and B. Baysinger (2005), “The Organization of Schumpeterian: in Lawless & Gomez-Mejia (Eds),” Strategic Management in High Technology Firm.JAI Press Inc, 3-14.
    Baranson, J. (1996), “Transfer of Technical Knowledge by International Corporations to Developing Economics,” American Economic Review, 56 (1/2), 259-261.
    Breschi, S., F. Malerba, and L. Oresenigo (2000), “Technological Regimes and Schumpeterien Patterns of Innovation,” Economic Journal, 110, 388-410.
    Buckley, P. J. and M. C. Casson (1976), “A Long-Run Theory of the Multinational Enterprise,” The Future of Multinational Enterprise, London: Macmillan, 32-65.
    Caves, R. E. (1971), “International Corporations: The Industrial Economics of Foreign Investment,” Economica, 38(149), 1-27.
    Chen, S. H. (2004), “Taiwanese IT Firms’ Offshore R&D in China and the Connection with the Global Innovation Network,” Research Policy, 33(2), 337-349.
    Contractor, F. J., & Kundu, S. K. (1998). Franchising versus company-run operations: Modal choice in the global hotel sector. Journal of International Marketing, 28-53.
    Coase, R. H. (1937). The nature of the firm. economica, 4(16), 386-405.
    Collis, D.J. & Montgomery, C.A. (1995), “Competing on Resources Strategy in the 1990s”, Harvard Business Review, July-August, 118-128.
    Dieter, F. and Kathy (1997), “Getting IT Right, Australian Accountant (AAA) , 67(10) ,” Nov, pp.50-52.
    Dunning, J. H. (1979), “Explaining Changing Patterns of International Production:In Outward Direct Investment of DevelopingCountries:in Support of The Eclectic Theory of International Production:In Defence of The Eclectic Theory,”Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics,Blackwell Publishing, 41(4) , 269-295.
    Dunning, J. H.(1980), “ Toward an eclectic theory of international productions: Some empirical tests,” Journal of International Business Studies,11,9-31.
    Davidson W. H. (1980).“The location of foreign direct investment activity: country characteristics and experience effects”, Journal of International Business Studies, 11(2): 9-22.
    Fagre, N. and L. T. Wells (1982). Bargaining Power of Multinationals and Host
    Governments. Journal of International Business Studies, 13, 9-23.
    Ford, D. (1988), “Develop Your Technology Strategy,” Long Range Planning, 21(5), 85-91.
    Filatotchev, I., Piga, C., and Dyomina, N. (2003), Network positioning and R&D activity: A study of Italian groups. R&D Management, 33(1), 37-48.
    Gatignon, H. and E. Anderson (1988), “The Multinational Corporation`s Degree of Control Over Foreign Subsidiaries: An Empirical Test of a Transaction Cost Explanation,” Journal of Low, Economics, and Organization, 4(2), 305-336.
    Grant, R. M. (1991), “The resource-based theory of competitive advantage:Implication for strategy formulation,” California Management Review, 114-133.
    Hagedoom, J. (1993), “Understanding the Rational of Strategic Technology Partnering: Interorganizational Modes of Cooperation and Sectoral Difference,”Strategic Management Journal, 14(5), 371-385.
    Hennart, J. F. and Y. R. Park (2007), “Greenfield vs. Acquisition: The Strategy of Japanese Investors in the United States,” Management Science, 39(9), 1054-1070.
    Hill, C. W. L., P. Hwang and W. C. Kim (1990), “An Eclectic Theory of the Choice of International Entry Mode,” Strategic Management Journal, 11(2), 117-128.
    Hymer, S. (1960), The International Operations of National Firms: A Study of Direct Foreign Investment, Ph.D. Dissertation, MIT. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1976.
    Kang, K. H. and J. Kang (2014), “Do External Knowledge Sourcing Modes Matter for Service Innovation? Empirical Evidence from South Korean Service Firm,”Journal of Produce Innovation Management, 31(1), 176-191.
    Killing (1988), Diversification through Licinsing, R&D Management, 8(3), 159-163.
    Kumar, V. and Velavan Subramaniam (1997), “A Contingency Framework for the Mode of Entry Decision”, Journal of World Business 32 (1), 53 - 72.
    Materia, V. C., S. Pascucci, and L. Dries (2014), “Are In-house and Outsourcing Innovation Strategies Interlinked? Evidence from the European Agri-food Sector,” Compete Working Paper.
    Lall, S. (1983), “Determinants of R&D in an LDC: The Indian Engineering Industry,”Economics Letters, 13,397-383.
    Lowe, J. and P.Taylor (1998), “R&D and Technology Purchase through License Agrement Complementary Strategy and Complementary Assets,”R&D Management, 28(14), 263-278.
    Lin, B. W., C. J. Chen and H. L.Wu, (2006), “Paten Portfolio Diversity, Technology Strategy and Firm Value,”IEEE Transactions on Enginerring Management, 53, 17-26.
    Lu, L. Y. and J. S. Liu (2004), “R&D in China: An Empirical Study of Taiwanese IT Companies,” R&D Management, 34 (4), 453-465.
    Noori, H. (1990), “Managind the Dynamics of New Technology,”Pretic-Hall Englewood Cliffs, 153-176.
    Penrose, E. (1959). The Theory of the Growth of the Firm. Oxford University Press: New York.
    Pisano, G. P. (1990), “The R&D Boundaries of the Firm: An Empirical Analysis,”Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), 153-176.
    S.H. Robock and K. Simmonds (1983), International Business and Multinational Enterprises, Homewood: Richard D. Irwin, Inc., pp.460-461.
    Robbin, S. P. (1990), “Organizational Theory: Structure, Design, and Applications,”3rd, New Jersey: Prentice Hall Inc, 176-177.
    Root, F. R. (1987). Entry Strategies for International Markets. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
    Sharif, M. N. (1988), “Basis for Techno-Economic Policy Analysis,”Science and Public Policy, 15(4), 217-229.
    Stopford, J. and L. Wells (1972). Managing the Multinational Enterprise: Organization of the Firms and Ownership of the Subsidiaries, London: Longman.
    Tidd, J. and M. J. Trewhella (1997), “Organizational and Technological Antecedentsof Knowledge Acquisition and Learning,” R&D Management, 27(4), 359-375.
    Tse, D. K., Pan, Y. & Au, K. Y. (1997), How MNCs Chose Modes and Alliances: The China Experience, Journal of International Business Studies, 28(4), 779-805.
    Vernon, R (1966), “International Investment and International Trade in the Product Cycle,”Quarterly Journal of Economic, 80,190-207.
    Vrande et al.(2006)
    Wernerfelt, B. (1984), “A resource-based view of the firm,” Strategic Management Journal, 5, 171-180.
    Williamson, O. E.(1975), “ Market and Hierarchies : Analysis and Antitrust Implication ”, New York: Free Press.
    Wind, Y. and H. Perlmutter (1977). On the Identification of Frontier Issues in
    42 International Marketing. Columbia Journal of World Business, Winter, 131-139.
    Yang, C. H., Y. Y. Wu and H. L. Lin (2009), “Outward Investment to China and Local Innovation of Taiwanese Manufacturing Firms,” Japanese Economic Review, 499-510.
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    行政管理碩士學程
    105921080
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0105921080
    Data Type: thesis
    DOI: 10.6814/THE.NCCU.MEPA.052.2018.F09
    Appears in Collections:[行政管理碩士學程(MEPA)] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    108001.pdf815KbAdobe PDF20View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback