English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 110182/141115 (78%)
Visitors : 46682296      Online Users : 1050
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/123057


    Title: 「民主和平」研究的方法論：「聽眾成本」概念之辨析
    A Methodological Evaluation of the Democratic Peace Research
    Authors: 黃旻華
    Huang, Min-Hua
    Contributors: 問題與研究
    Keywords: 民主和平;聽眾成本;實證主義方法論;理性主義
    democratic peace;audience costs;methodology;rationalism
    Date: 2001-01
    Issue Date: 2019-04-18 13:59:12 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 「民主和平」研究是近十年來美國主流國關學界重要的議題之一，大量經驗檢證文獻指出，「民主和平」是無法否定的事實。這樣的結論不但早已成為主流學界的共識，許多學者呼籲未來的研究不該再是爭論「民主和平」存不存在，而是如何解釋「民主和平」的事實。然而，這樣的觀點即便從「實證主義」立場來看，都還有許多方法論的問題存在。本文指出，在這些方法論問題尚未得到適當處理之前，對於「民主和平」研究仍不應作出過度的宣稱。
    The “Democratic Peace” has been one of the most important topics in American international relations academies in the last decade. Many empirical studies have indicated that the Democratic Peace is a robust proposition, not a statistical artifact. This opinion not only has become a consensus in the mainstream academy, but also gives rise to a loud voice for shifting the debate from whether or not Democratic Peace exists to how can we best explain the phenomenon. However, even from the positivist’s view of methodology, the democratic peace research still suffers some fundamental problems. This article examines these methodological problems and evaluates the democratic peace paradigm. The conclusion is that the Democratic Peace theory not so robust as originally thought, and much effort must be made in order to bridge the discontinuity in the democratic peace explanations.
    Relation: 問題與研究, 40(1), 87-107
    Data Type: article
    Appears in Collections:[問題與研究 TSSCI] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    331.pdf1117KbAdobe PDF2122View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback