 |
English
|
正體中文
|
简体中文
|
Post-Print筆數 : 27 |
Items with full text/Total items : 111321/142230 (78%)
Visitors : 48434342
Online Users : 675
|
|
|
Loading...
|
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/123117
|
| Title: | 印巴、僧泰的多元衝突分析與方法評議
Multiconflict Analysis of India-Pakistan, Sinhala-Tamil, and Rethinking Analytic Methods |
| Authors: | 張育銓
Chang, Yu-Chuan |
| Contributors: | 問題與研究 |
| Keywords: | 殖民主義;多元衝突分析;印度;斯里蘭卡
Colonialism;India;Sri Lanka;Multiconflict Analyses;Divide-and-Rule;Dual Mandate |
| Date: | 2010-06 |
| Issue Date: | 2019-04-23 09:15:48 (UTC+8) |
| Abstract: | 討論殖民議題時，有學者指出，殖民者利用多族群的對立，採取「分而治之」的政策，以達到殖民目的；也有學者以「雙重使命」的角度，認為殖民者在殖民地不僅從事破壞，也執行建設，不該遺漏或偏頗其中一項。筆者認為，這兩種對殖民政策的分析方式，容易陷入殖民論述中常見的二分法困境，將殖民者採用「分而治之」的策略，認為是殖民者掌握殖民地的族群對立之後的理性計算，或是無法加以治理族群對立而不得不的退讓，而「雙重使命」則可能合理化殖民政策與忽略不同殖民地的特性。因此，本文質疑以「分而治之」與「雙重使命」為架構的殖民議題分析，是否符合當時的殖民脈絡？以及這樣的分析是否能呈現殖民經驗與殖民的治理性？本文在這樣的問題意識下，以英國殖民印度與斯里蘭卡為例，於殖民脈絡下，以地緣政治、族群、宗教、空間、語言、階級、全球化資本主義等因素，進行「多元衝突分析」，做為進一步探討殖民的起點。
Of colonial topics, a lot of scholars indicate that colonizers exploited the opposition in different races and enforced the tactics of Divide-and-Rule for the colonial purposes. Another school of scholars, based on the Dual Mandate approach, indicates that colonizers not just destroy but construct the colony as well. The article considers two approaches that led to the dilemma of colonial discourses especially on dichotomy - Divide-and-Rule, which leads to either colonizers controlling the characteristic of conflicts between ethicities, or conceding the powerless with conflicts between ethnicities and Dual Mandate, which rationalizes the colonial policy and neglects the characteristics of different colonies. Therefore, the article queries the analytic frames of Divide-and-Rule and Dual Mandate in the colonial context, as whether the two approaches can explain the colonial experiences and the governmentality of colonialism. The article focuses on the conflict in India and Sri Lanka during the last phase of British colonization with multiconflict analysis, including political geography, ethnicity, religion, space, language, class, and global capitalism. The article hopes to be a new start in the study of colonialism. |
| Relation: | 問題與研究, 49(2), 131-154 |
| Data Type: | article |
| Appears in Collections: | [Issues & Studies] Articles
|
Files in This Item:
| File |
Description |
Size | Format | |
|---|
| 391.pdf | | 1136Kb | Adobe PDF2 | 176 | View/Open |
|
All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.
|
著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.
2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(
nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(
nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
