 |
English
|
正體中文
|
简体中文
|
Post-Print筆數 : 27 |
Items with full text/Total items : 111321/142230 (78%)
Visitors : 48411106
Online Users : 770
|
|
|
Loading...
|
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/123125
|
| Title: | 批判性地緣政治與外交政策分析：以美國的波士尼亞政策為例
Critical Geopolitics and Foreign Policy Analysis: The Case of USA`s Bosnia Policy |
| Authors: | 李俊毅
Lee, Jyun-Yi |
| Contributors: | 問題與研究 |
| Keywords: | 批判性地緣政治;論述分析;外交政策分析;波士尼亞戰爭
Critical Geopolitics;discourse analysis;foreign policy analysis;the Bosnian war |
| Date: | 2010-12 |
| Issue Date: | 2019-04-23 09:22:40 (UTC+8) |
| Abstract: | 本文從批判性地緣政治(critical geopolitics)的角度，持由波士尼亞戰爭（1992-1995年）比一案例，探討後冷戰時期美國的外交政策。深受國際關係後實證主義(post-positivism)的影響，批判性地緣政治旨在問題化(problematize)地緣政治的思想，主張地緣政治的基本元素，例如主權、領土、疆界、民族國家等，其意義不是既定的，而是社會實踐的結果。外交政策的功能之一，即是為由賦予特定「他者」一個地緣政治的意義，建構或合理化國家的政策選項。據此以說，美國由不肯／不能出兵波士尼亞，到最後積極介入和平協議的簽訂，或可詮釋為是原先政府或政治菁英對於波士尼亞的主流建構－歷史仇恨與種族衝突－逐漸受到另一套「大屠殺」論述挑戰（但非取代）的緣故。最後，本文將指出，雖然這樣的研究途徑似乎確認了「西方」的權力能力，從而強化了現實主義的論述，但二者之間所開展出來的、對國際關係的理解與研究，卻是大不相同的。
This paper uses the approach of critical geopolitics to study the US foreign policy in the post-Cold War era, with the Bosnian war (1992-1995) being the empirical case. Influenced by the stream of post-positivism in International Relations (IR), critical geopolitics aims at problematizing traditional geopolitical thinking, holding that the meaning of concepts such as sovereignty, territory, boundary, nation-state, and so on, is not given and fixed, but is a construct of social practices. One function of foreign policy is thus to give an ”Other” a specific geopolitical meaning, thereby constructing or rationalizing possible policy options. Upon this basis, the process of which the US government eventually intervened actively in Bosnia might be interpreted as a shift in discourse in the sense that the dominant discourse of ancient hatred and ethnic conflict had gradually been challenged (although not replaced) by another discourse of holocaust. While such research approach may seem to confirm the power of the West in determining facts and actions needed, and therefore reinforce the claim of realism, there remain significant differences in research orientation, theory-building, and implications between the two. |
| Relation: | 問題與研究, 49(4), 107-134 |
| Data Type: | article |
| Appears in Collections: | [問題與研究 TSSCI] 期刊論文
|
Files in This Item:
| File |
Description |
Size | Format | |
|---|
| 399.pdf | | 1434Kb | Adobe PDF2 | 205 | View/Open |
|
All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.
|
著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.
2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(
nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(
nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
