English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 110091/141038 (78%)
Visitors : 46394056      Online Users : 1161
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/123182


    Title: 鑿開霸權：普世主義與相對主義之外關於“民主”的知識
    Opening Hegemony: Democratic Knowledge Production beyond Universalism and Relativism
    Authors: 石之瑜
    Shih, Chih-Yu
    Contributors: 中國大陸研究
    Keywords: 新左派;自由主義;中國民主化;台灣;普世主義;相對主義
    new left;liberalism;Chinese democracy;Taiwan;universalism;relativism
    Date: 2001-03
    Issue Date: 2019-05-02 10:50:57 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 當前關於中國民主化的種種預設，是對中國民主化進行研究的知識產物，不存在於知識體系之外。但對這個研究議程既有的一些抗拒，則因為掉進了普世主義與相對主義的對比，也成為一種具有封閉傾向的知識霸權。本文提出一個「鑿開」的知識論，認為民主的意義，在於突破文化霸權，所謂民主知識，就是發掘成形中的文化霸權，並保留所有鑿開可能性的論述，這個論述將研究對象當作為知識的來源，並在論述上為他們開創各種潛在意義的空間，即使是過分解讀也不妨，因為愈寬廣的意義空間與愈複雜的可能形式，愈能防止霸權的鞏固，厥為民主知識。民主知識不是實驗得來的，而是在地實證的；不是以公共領域的壟斷性為前提的，而是突破壟斷性的；不是研究者發現後才存在的，而是實際的人實踐出來的；不是亙古不變的，而是隨時流動沒有固定形式的；不是不證自明的，而是要透過層層詮釋辯證的。
    Contemporary studies of Chinese democracy are epistemologically hegemonic in that they close off the possibility of reinterpreting the meaning of democracy. The discussion of this paper moves beyond democracy in institutional, value, and personality terms. Instead, it explores the possibility of seeing democracy as an epistemological tool of opening cultural hegemonies. The practice of epistemological democracy depends on the reading and re-reading of on-going practices in people’s life experiences. Democracy is preserved to the extent that scholars are always able to read into practices meanings that are outside of any existent or emerging hegemonies. From this perspective, this paper is also a critique of writings by both liberals and new leftists in the current cultural debates.
    Relation: 中國大陸研究, 44(3), 1-15
    Data Type: article
    Appears in Collections:[中國大陸研究 TSSCI] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    456.pdf1134KbAdobe PDF2162View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback