English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113159/144130 (79%)
Visitors : 50730953      Online Users : 293
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/123200


    Title: 超越普遍主義與相對主義人權觀有關辯論的省思
    Beyond the Dichotomy of Human Right Universalism and Cultural Relativism
    Authors: 石之瑜
    Shih, Chih-Yu
    周嘉辰
    Chou, Chia-Chen
    Contributors: 中國大陸研究
    Keywords: 普遍主義;相對主義;亞洲價值;人權;後現代
    universalism;relativism;Asian Value;human rights;post-modernism
    Date: 2001-11
    Issue Date: 2019-05-02 10:55:20 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 二十世紀末期所召開對亞洲價值有關的辯論甚多，其中研討會的成果在新近發表的有三本，對這個課題有十分新穎而廣泛的探討，值得國內學界重視。我們所評論的諸多立場，似乎都同意普遍主義是特殊歷史脈絡的產物，而相對主義之中則隱藏了一種普遍主義的邏輯。簡言之，這個二元對立是錯誤的，因為普遍主義與相對主義都不是事實，也都非關乎道德，更都不是人類的天性。個人的存在必須經由責任感的培養來獲得肯認。只有在個人可以知道除了自身所處的價值體系之外，尚有其他正當的選項，這種責任感才是有意義的。在此意義之下，所謂權利，就是持續不斷地變動、混和、揭露與創造各種位置與認同的可能性。政治壓迫在道德上是錯的原因在於，它否定了不同形式的存在意義，關閉了可能性，斷定了不可決定的流動需要，使蘊含著解放與人道的機緣都遭到封鎖。
    All the work under review seems to agree that universalism is a product of relative history and relativism hosts a universalistic logic within the said communitarian boundaries. In short, the dichotomy is false. It should be clear that neither universalism nor relativism is a fact, nor are they about morality, nor can they justify themselves as human nature. Therefore, individuals must be recognized through self-responsibility in moving in and out of relative value systems. This responsibility is viable only if it is possible for individuals to be aware of the legitimate alternatives to their value systems. Right, in this sense, are rights to constantly shifting, combining, opening, and creating positions and identities. Political oppression is wrong because it denies alternative forms of existence, closes possibilities and arbitrates the undecidable, which harbor opportunities for emancipation and humanity.
    Relation: 中國大陸研究, 44(11), 1-14
    Data Type: article
    Appears in Collections:[中國大陸研究 TSSCI] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    474.pdf1077KbAdobe PDF2167View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback