English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 92604/122928 (75%)
Visitors : 26811573      Online Users : 485
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/124432


    Title: 債務不履行損害賠償之體系-給付不能概念之重生與再造
    The Reconstruction of the Nonperformance of Obligation System: The Regeneration and Rebuild of the Concept of Impossibility of Performance
    Authors: 黃松茂
    Huang, Sung-Mao
    Contributors: 法學評論
    Keywords: 給付不能;給付遲延;債務不履行;履行請求權;聯合國買賣公約;歐洲契約法原則;國際商事契約通則;違約救濟;德國債法現代化;義務違反
    Impossibility of Performance;Delay of Performance;Non-Performance of Obligation;Damages;Specific Performance;CISG;PECL;PICC;Breach of Contract;Modernization of the Law of Obligations of German Civil Code;Breach of Duty
    Date: 2017-12
    Issue Date: 2019-07-24 16:01:31 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 依我國傳統學說見解,給付不能之概念乃債務不履行類型化之起點。我國民法債編主要繼受德國一九○○年民法,然其債務不履行之體系,是否果真如傳統見解所言,以給付不能及給付遲延為兩大基本態樣, 為本文所提出之疑問。本文將從學說理論史(Dogmengeschichte)之角度,探討「給付不能」之概念在十九世紀Pandekten法學及德國民法立法時所扮演之角色,冀能由此重新檢視我國債務不履行體系,並建立起銜接我國契約責任法與國際契約法之橋梁。另一方面,德國債法修正之初主張效法國際契約法文件,消除一切給付障礙態樣之區分,然德國二○○二年債法現代化後之給付障礙法制,是否果真脫離類型區分之羈絆,亦為本文之觀察重點。
    The concept of impossibility of performance has traditionally been considered as the starting point of the categorization of nonperformance of obligation in Taiwan. Since the Obligation Law of Taiwan is transplanted from the German Civil Code (BGB) of 1900, this article attempts to analyze whether or not the impossibility of performance and the delay of performance are the basic types in our non-performance of obligation system-as it is traditionally regarded. This article discusses the role of the concept of impossibility of performance it has played within the Pandekten legal theory in 19th century and also at the beginning of the German Civil Code (BGB) from the history of dogmas point of view. This Article aims to review the impossibility of performance system in Taiwan and to connect our contract liability law with international contract laws. On the other hand, the draft of the Modernization of the Law of Obligation Act in Germany tended to follow the international contract documents and to eliminate the categorizations of non-performance of obligation. This article examines whether the German Act of Modernization of the Law of Obligation of 2002 is unfettered from the categorization of nonperformance of obligation.
    Relation: 法學評論, 151, 1-90
    Data Type: article
    DOI 連結: https://doi.org/ 10.3966/102398202017120151001
    DOI: 10.3966/102398202017120151001
    Appears in Collections:[法學評論 TSSCI] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    56.pdf1986KbAdobe PDF48View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback