English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 96743/127403 (76%)
Visitors : 32412877      Online Users : 509
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/131778


    Title: 轉大人過程中的愛情:成年初期社會身分的轉變與親密關係之維繫
    Romantic Relationships in Emerging Adulthood: The Change of Social Roles and the Maintenance of Intimacy in Early Adulthood
    Authors: 黃軒
    Huang, Hsuan
    Contributors: 胡力中
    Hu, Li-Chung
    黃軒
    Huang, Hsuan
    Keywords: 轉大人時期
    社會身分
    親密關係
    生命歷程
    臺灣九○後世代
    Date: 2019
    Issue Date: 2020-09-02 12:44:29 (UTC+8)
    Abstract:   當社會發展日漸富足,工業化國家不再急需年輕人盡早進入勞動力市場。且受人口結構變遷影響,婚育年齡被推遲,鬆綁了青少年直接進入成人角色的社會規範,並催生了得以恣意探索的「轉大人時期」。儘管過去研究指稱,轉大人時期是發展親密關係的重要階段,但此時也是社會身分頻繁更迭的時刻,包含離家求學、入伍從軍、投身職場等事件,未必利於延續關係發展。因此本文旨在探究轉大人時期歷經社會身分轉換後的親密關係,試圖了解伴侶中任一方社會身分轉換如何影響關係發展?雙方將採以何種方式維繫關係?
      本次研究對象為臺灣九○後世代青年,透過半結構式深度訪談,本研究結果發現:一、社會身分轉換確實會影響關係走向,亦會牽動個人自我認知、改變個人維繫方式。二、社會身分轉換是關係中的「轉捩點」,將加劇雙方歧異、稀釋情愛,也會重整關係發展、權力分佈,抑或催化關係進程、迫使雙方正視既存問題。三、當任一方邁入就業階段,維繫模式將從學生時期的「以量取勝」轉以「重質不重量」,並加重使用「社會網絡」穩固關係。四、性別角色態度、個人生命歷程等皆會影響維繫方式,且該世代面臨的各項不確定性因素,促使「佛系經營法」出現。五、該世代日漸重視「婚前探索」,延長了轉大人過程,但男性可探索時間仍較女性充裕。六、該世代婚育規劃呈現兩種圖像,部分青年體認執行計劃的窒礙難行,抑或不再視婚姻、生育為必要生命事件,因此以「隨緣」態度應對,反映該世代逐漸脫離標準化生命歷程常軌;部分青年則深受社會身分轉換影響,女性尤其意圖加快轉大人過程,企盼盡快進入下一個生命階段。儘管轉大人過程深受性別影響,但該世代的性別角色態度仍有式微之處。
    Reference: 中文專書
    Ansari, Aziz、Klinenberg, Eric著、洪惠美譯,2016,《救救我的羅曼史:破解已讀不回、舊愛不死、簡訊分手的愛情對策》。臺北:遠見天下文化。
    Bauman, Zygmunt 著、何定照、高瑟濡譯,2007,《液態之愛》。臺北:商周、城邦文化出版。
    Coontz, Stephanie著、秦傳安、王璠譯,2009,《婚姻簡史︰愛情怎麼征服了婚姻》。北京:中央編譯出版社。
    Elder, Jr. G. H.著、田禾、馬春華譯,2002,《大蕭條的孩子們》。南京:譯林。
    Giddens, Anthony著、周素鳳譯,2001,《親密關係的轉變:現代社會的性、愛、慾》。臺北:巨流。
    Jay, Meg著、胡琦君譯,2012,《20世代,你的人生是不是卡住了:你以為時間 還很多,但有些決定不能拖》。臺北:天下遠見。
    Jenkins, Richard著、王志弘、許妍飛譯,2006,《社會認同》。臺北:巨流。
    Slater, Dan著、楊路譯,2014,《數位世代的愛情:科技對交友與擇偶的影響》。臺中:五南圖書出版。
    Tapscott, Don著、羅耀宗、黃貝玲、蔡宏明譯,2009,《N世代衝撞:網路新人類正在改變你的世界》。臺北:美商麥格羅‧希爾。
    Turkle, Sherry著、洪世民譯,2017,《在一起孤獨:科技拉近了彼此距離,卻讓我們害怕親密交流?》。臺北:時報出版。
    石芳瑜,2012,《花轎、牛車、偉士牌:臺灣愛情四百年》。臺北:有鹿文化。
    伊慶春,1982,〈已婚職業婦女的雙重角色:期望、衝突與調適〉。《中央研究院三民主義研究所叢刊》(9):405-430。
    吳承紘,2017,《厭世代-低薪、貧窮與看不見的未來》。臺北:月熊出版。
    吳清山,2008,《解讀臺灣教育改革》。臺北:心理出版。
    吳駿盛,2014,〈22K〉。頁53-77,收錄於丁允恭編,《島國關賤字:屬於我們這個世代、這個時代的臺灣社會力分析》。臺北:左岸文化。
    呂玉瑕、周玉慧,2015,〈二十一世紀臺灣青少年性別角色態度之形成與變遷〉。《臺灣社會學刊》(58): 95-155。
    李美玲、楊亞潔、伊慶春,2000,〈家務分工:就業現實還是平等理念?〉。《臺灣社會學刊》(24): 59-88。
    李素月、陳延昇,2015,〈偶像劇中愛情與性別角色的再現與迷思:以臺灣偶像劇的男女主角互動為例〉。《中華傳播學刊》(28): 157-196。
    林依伶、楊子霆,2018,〈經濟成長、薪資停滯?初探臺灣實質薪資與勞動生產力成長脫勾之成因〉。《經濟論文》46(2): 263-322。
    林宗弘、洪敬舒、李健鴻、王兆慶、張烽益,2011,《崩世代:財團化、貧窮化與少子女化的危機》。臺北:臺灣勞工陣線。
    林芳玫,2006,《解讀瓊瑤愛情王國》。臺北:臺灣商務。
    張思嘉、李雅雯,2009,〈擇偶歷程中影響關係發展的關鍵因素〉。《中華輔導與諮商學報》(25): 179-212。
    張思嘉、周玉慧,2004,〈緣與婚前關係的發展〉。《本土心理學研究》(21): 85-123。
    游美惠,2014,〈情感教育:仍待積極開展的研究領域與教學實踐〉。婦研縱橫101: 40-44。
    黃毅志、陳怡靖,2005,〈臺灣的升學問題:教育社會學理論與研究之檢討〉。《臺灣教育社會學研究》5(1): 77-118。
    楊文山,2008,〈年輕人為什麼不結婚:臺灣社會未來婚姻趨勢研究〉。《生命教育研究期刊》,177-207。高雄:圓照寺九華圖書社。
    趙彥寧,2010,〈不/可計量的親密關係:老t搬家三探〉。《臺灣社會研究季刊》(80): 3-56。
    劉正、李錦華,2001,〈文憑主義的迷思:從勞工的薪資及雇主的徵才談起〉。《臺灣教育社會學研究》1(2): 91-129。
    劉冠儀,2017,《「誰不希望好?」:第二代都市原住民男性的勞動生命流轉》。臺北:國立陽明大學衛生福利研究所碩士論文。
    鍾秉融、謝宏仁、鍾金原,2017,〈我還不想結婚:七位女性對於婚姻的共同想像〉。《國立臺灣科技大學人文社會學報》13(3): 191-217。
    翁康容、謝雨生,2018,〈台灣民眾轉至成人發展歷程之類型與變遷〉。《台灣社會學》(36): 111-166.
    瞿宛文,2017,《臺灣戰後經濟發展的源起:後進發展的為何與如何》。臺北:聯經出版。
    藍佩嘉,2015,〈質性個案研究法:紮根理論與延伸個案法〉。頁63-96,收於瞿海源、畢恆達、劉長萱、楊國樞編,《社會及行為科學研究法:質性研究法》。臺北:東華書局。

    英文專書
    Allison, R., and Risman, B., 2014, “"It Goes Hand in Hand with the Parties": Race, Class, and Residence in College Student Negotiations of Hooking Up.” Sociological Perspectives 57(1): 102-123.
    Almeida, D., 2004, “Using daily diaries to assess temporal friction between work and family.” Pp. 127-136 in Work-Family Challenges for Low-Income Parents and their Children, edited by A. C. Crouter and A. Booth. Mahwah. NJ, US: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
    Arnett, J. J., 1994, “Are College Students Adults? Their Conceptions of the Transition to Adulthood” Journal of Adult Development 1(4): 213-224 •
    Arnett, J. J., 2000, “Emerging adulthood: A theory of development from the late teens   through the twenties.” American Psychologist 55(5): 469-480.
    Arnett, J. J., 2004, Emerging Adulthood: The Winding Road from the Late Teens Through the Twenties. New York: Oxford University Press.
    Arnett, J. J., 2007, “Emerging Adulthood: What Is It, and What Is It Good For? ” Child   Development Perspectives 1: 68-73.
    Arnett, J. J., 2016, “College Students as Emerging Adults: The Developmental Implications of the College Context.” Emerging Adulthood 4(3): 219–222.
    Blumberg, R. L. and Coleman, M. T., 1989, “A Theoretical Look at the Gender Balance of Power in the American Couple.” Journal of Family Issues 10(2): 225–250.
    Buchmann, M., and Kriesi, I., 2009, “Escaping the gender trap: Young women’s transition into nontraditional occupations.” Pp. 193–215 in Transitions from school to work: Globalization, individualization, and patterns of diversity, edited by I. Schoon and R. K. Silbereisen. New York: Cambridge University.
    Buhl, Heike M., 2007, “Well-being and Child – Parent Relationship University to Work Life.” Journal of Adolescent Research 22(5): 550-571.
    Campbell, S.M., 1980, The Couple’s Journey: Intimacy as a Path to Wholeness. CA: Impact Publishers.
    Chapman, G., 1992, The five love languages: How to express heartfelt commitment to your mate. Chicago, IL: Northfield Publishing.
    Chelune, G. J., Robinson, J. T., Kommor, M. F., 1984, “A cognitive interactional model of intimate relationships.” Pp. 11-40 in Communication, Intimacy, and Close Relationships, edited by V. J. Derlega. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
    Cheng, Yen-Hsin, 2014, “Changing partner choice and marriage propensities by education in post-industrial Taiwan, 2000-2010.” Demographic Research 31: 1007-1042.
    Cohen, P., Kasen, S., Chen, H., Hartmark, C., and Gordon, K., 2003, “Variations in patterns of developmental transmissions in the emerging adulthood period.” Developmental Psychology 39 (4): 657-669.
    Cook, T. D., and Furstenberg Jr., F. F., 2002, “Explaining Aspects of the Transition to Adulthood in Italy, Sweden, Germany, and the United States: A Cross-Disciplinary, Case Synthesis Approach.” THE ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 580(1): 255-287.
    Coyne, S. M., Padilla-Walker, L. M., and Howard, E., 2013,” Emerging in a Digital World: A Decade Review of Media Use, Effects, and Gratifications in Emerging Adulthood.” Emerging Adulthood 1(2): 125–137.
    Craig, L., and Brown, J., 2014, “Weekend work and leisure time with family and friends: Who misses out?” Journal of Marriage and Family 76(4): 710– 727.
    Crocetti, E., Tagliabue, S., Sugimura, K., Nelson, L. J., Takahashi, A., Niwa, T., Sugiura, Y. and Jinno, M., 2015, “Perceptions of Emerging Adulthood: A Study With Italian and Japanese University Students and Young Workers.” Emerging Adulthood 3(4): 229–243.
    Dainton, M., and Gross, J., 2008, “The use of negative behaviors to maintain relationships.” Communication Research Reports 25(3): 179-191.
    Dindia, K., and Canary, D. J., 1993, “Definitions and Theoretical Perspectives on Maintaining Relationships.” Journal of Social and Personal Relationships 10(2): 163–173.
    Egbert, N., and Polk, D., 2006, “Speaking the language of relational maintenance: A validity test of Chapman’s (1992) five love languages.” Communication Research Reports 23(1):19-26.
    Elder, Jr. G. H., 1998, “The Life Course as Developmental Theory.” Child  Development 69(1): 1-12.
    Erikson, E. H., 1968, Identity: Youth and crisis. New York: Norton.
    Furstenberg, F. F., Jr., Rumbaut, R. C., and Settersten, R. A., Jr., 2005, “On the Frontier of Adulthood: Emerging Themes and New Directions.” Pp. 3-25 in On the frontier of adulthood: Theory, research, and public policy, edited by R. A. Settersten, Jr., F. F. Furstenberg, Jr., and R. G. Rumbaut. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
    Giles, H., Reid, S. A., and Harwood, J., 2010, “Introducing the dynamics of intergroup communication.” Pp. 1-16 in The dynamics of intergroup communication, edited by H. Giles, S. Reid, and J. Harwood. New York, NY: Peter Lang.
    Hart, M., 2015, “Youth Intimacy on Tumblr: A Pilot Study.” YOUNG 23(3): 193–208.
    Hobbs, M., Owen, S., and Gerber, L., 2017,” Liquid love? Dating apps, sex, relationships and the digital transformation of intimacy.” Journal of Sociology 53(2): 271–284.
    Hogg, M., Terry, D., and White, K., 1995,” A Tale of Two Theories: A Critical   Comparison of Identity Theory with Social Identity Theory.” Social Psychology   Quarterly 58(4): 255-269.
    Howe, N. and Strauss, W., 2000, Millennials Rising: The Next Great Generation. NY: Vintage Books.
    Huang, L.-W. W., 2013, “The Transition Tempo and Life Course Orientation of Young   Adults in Taiwan.” The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and   Social Science 646(1): 69–85.
    Jamieson, L., 2011, “Intimacy as a Concept: Explaining Social Change in the Context of Globalisation or Another Form of Ethnocentricism?” Sociological Research Online 16(4): 1–13.
    Kao, Ying-Chao and Bih, Herng-Dar, 2014, “Masculinity in Ambiguity: Constructing Taiwanese Masculine Identities Between Great Powers.” Pp. 175-191 in Masculinities in a Global Era, edited by Joseph Gelfer. New York: Springer.
    Kim, J. L., Sorsoli, C. L., Collins, K., Zylbergold, B. A., Schooler, D., and Tolman, D.   L., 2007, “From Sex to Sexuality: Exposing the Heterosexual Script on Primetime Network Television.” The Journal of Sex Research 44(2): 145-157.
    Lancaster, L. C. and Stillman, D., 2002, When Generations Collide. Who They Are. Why They Clash. How to Solve the Generational Puzzle at Work. New York: Collins Business.
    Lever, J., Frederick, D. A., and Hertz, R., 2015, “Who Pays for Dates? Following Versus Challenging Gender Norms.” SAGE Open 5(4): 1-14.
    Lewis, R. A., 1973, “A longitudinal test of a developmental framework for premarital dyadic formation.” Journal of Marriage and the Family 35(1): 16-25.
    Luyckx, K., Schwartz, S. J., Goossens, L., and Pollock, S., 2008, “Employment, sense of coherence, and identity formation: Contextual and psychological processes on the pathway to sense of adulthood.” Journal of Adolescent Research 23(5): 566-591.
    Maines, David R., and Hardesty, Monica J., 1987, “Temporality and Gender: Young   Adults' Career and Family Plans.” Social Forces 66(1): 102–120.
    Mannheim, K., 1952. “The Problem of Generations.” Pp. 109-155 in Theories of Ethnicity: A Classical Reader, edited by W. Sollors. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
    Marcia, J. E., 1966, “Development and validation of ego-identity status.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 3(5): 551–558.
    Marshall, T. C., Bejanyan, K., Di Castro, G., and Lee, R. A., 2012, “Attachment styles as predcitors of Facebook-related jealousy and surveillance in romantic relationships.” Personal Relationships 20(1): 1–22.
    McClintock, E. A., 2014, “Beauty and Status: The Illusion of Exchange in Partner Selection?” American Sociological Review 79(4): 575–604.
    Modell, J., 1989, Into One's Own: From Youth to Adulthood in the United States, 1920-1975. Berkeley: University of California Press.
    Oppenheimer, V., 2003, “Cohabiting and Marriage during Young Men's Career-Development Process.” Demography 40(1): 127–149.
    Pierce, C.A., Byrne, D., & Aguinis, H., 1996, “Attraction in organizations: A model of workplace romance.” Journal of Organizational Behavior 17: 5–32.
    Pryor, J. H., Hurtado, S., Saenz, V. B., Santos, J. L., and Korn, W. S., 2007, The American freshman: Forty year trends. Los Angeles, CA: Higher Education Research Institute.
    Reiss, I. L., 1960, “Toward a sociology of the heterosexual love relationship.” Marriage and Family Living 22(2): 139–145.
    Rindfuss, R., 1991, “The Young Adult Years: Diversity, Structural Change, and   Fertility.” Demography 28(4): 493–512.
    Robards, B., and Lincoln, S., 2016, “Making It “Facebook Official”: Reflecting on Romantic Relationships Through Sustained Facebook Use.” Social Media + Society 2(4): 1–10.
    Ryder, N. B., 1965. “The Cohort as a Concept in the Study of Social Change.” American Sociological Review 30(6): 843–861.
    Schwartz, S. J., 2016, “Turning Point for a Turning Point: Advancing Emerging Adulthood Theory and Research.” Emerging Adulthood 4(5): 307–317.
    Seabrook, R. C., Ward, L. M., Reed, L., Manago, A., Giaccardi, S., and Lippman, J. R., 2016, “Our Scripted Sexuality: The Development and Validation of a Measure of the Heterosexual Script and Its Relation to Television Consumption.” Emerging Adulthood 4(5): 338–355.
    Shanahan, M., 2000, “Pathways to Adulthood in Changing Societies: Variability and   Mechanisms in Life Course Perspective.” Annual Review of Sociology 26: 667-692.
    Shulman, S., and Connolly, J., 2013, “The Challenge of Romantic Relationships in   Emerging Adulthood: Reconceptualization of the Field” Emerging Adulthood 1(1): 27-39.
    Shulman, S., Hakhmigari, M. K., Michaeli, Y., Tuval-Mashiach, R., and Dickson, D. J., 2016, “Achieving Work and Love Authorship in Emerging Adulthood: Types, Psychosocial Correlations, and Precursors.” Emerging Adulthood 4(4): 258–271.
    Stafford, L., and Canary, D. J., 1991, “Maintenance strategies and romantic relationship type, gender and relational characteristics.” Journal of Social and Personal Relationships 8(2): 217-242.
    Stafford, L., Dainton, M., and Haas, S. M., 2000, “Measuring routine and strategic relational maintenance: Scale revision, sex versus gender roles, and prediction of relational characteristics.” Communication Monographs 67(3): 306-323.
    Sternberg, Robert J., 1986, “A triangular theory of love.” Psychological Review 93(2): 119-135.
    Sunstein, C. R., 1996, “Social norms and social roles”. Columbia law review 96(4): 903-968.
    Tajfel, H., 1974, “Social identity and intergroup behavior.” Social Science Information 13(2): 65–93.
    Tajfel, H., and Turner, J. C., 1986, “The Social Identity Theory of Inter-Group Behavior,” in Psychology of Intergroup Relations, edited by Stephen Worchel and William G. Austin. Chicago: Nelson-Hall.
    Tajfel, H., and Turner, J., 1979, “An integrative theory of intergroup conflict.” Pp. 33-47 in The social psychology of intergroup relations, edited by W. Austin and S. Worchel. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
    Takeuchi, M., and Tsutsui, J., 2016, “Combining egalitarian working lives with traditional attitudes: Gender role attitudes in Taiwan, Japan, and Korea.” International Journal of Japanese Sociology 25(1): 100–116.
    Vignoles, V. L., Schwartz, S. J., and Luyckx, K., 2011, “Introduction: Toward an integrative view of identity.” Pp. 1-28 in Handbook of identity theory and research, edited by S. J. Schwartz, K. Luyckx, and V. L. Vignoles. New York: Springer.
    Waring, E.M., Tillman, M.H., Frelick, L.F., Russell, L.K., and Weisz, G.M., 1980, “Concepts of intimacy in the general population.” The Journal of nervous and mental disease 168(8): 471-474.
    Yoder, A. E., 2000, “Barriers to ego identity status formation: A contextual clarification of Marcia’s identity status paradigm.” Journal of Adolescence 23(1): 95-106.

    網路資料
    全國法規資料庫,2020,勞動基準法。https://law.moj.gov.tw/LawClass/LawAll.aspx?pcode=N0030001,取用日期:2020年8月14日。
    呂蓓君、葉俊宏,2018,〈佛系青年低慾望不強求 年輕世代困境縮影〉。TVBS,5月16日。https://news.tvbs.com.tw/local/921143,取用日期:2020年1月18日。
    役政署,2019,服役須知。https://www.nca.gov.tw/chaspx/Faq_Detail.aspx?web=84&id=10502,取用日期:2019年12月22日。
    李念庭,2018,〈「佛系青年」崛起:是豁達還逃避?年輕世代困境真相〉。https://www.cheers.com.tw/article/article.action?id=5088018&page=2,取用日期:2020年1月18日。
    海軍軍官學校,官校生活的一天。 https://www.cna.edu.tw/tw/Life.php?progId=LIF003,取用日期:2020年8月17日。
    張錦弘,2017,〈指考38分可填志願…遙想當年聯考 380分只能吊車尾〉。聯合報,8月9日。https://udn.com/news/story/6925/2631580,取用日期:2020年2月15日。
    張瀞文,2013,〈談戀愛記大過 中學校規問題多〉。https://anntw.com/articles/20131119-E9yZ,取用日期:2019年9月13日。
    教育部,2019,全國大專校院校數。https://ulist.moe.gov.tw/Browse/UniversityList,取用日期:2020年1月21日。
    教育部臺灣閩南語常用詞辭典,2011,轉大人。https://twblg.dict.edu.tw/holodict_new/result_detail.jsp?n_no=12658&source=9&level1=9&level2=39&level3=0&curpage=0&sample=0&radiobutton=0&querytarget=0&limit=1&pagenum=0&rowcount=0&cattype=1,取用日期:2020年1月5日。
    統計處,2016,如何計算在學率?https://depart.moe.edu.tw/ED4500/News_Content.aspx?n=780B4CFF8FB1916B&sms=23D255462E62FBCD&s=D6DF2921B0091791,取用日期:2019年12月19日。
    統計處,2018,大學校院新生錄取人數及錄取率。http://stats.moe.gov.tw/files/important/OVERVIEW_U10.pdf,取用日期:2019年8月20日。
    統計處,2019,教育統計查詢網。https://stats.moe.gov.tw/qframe.aspx?qno=MgA3AA2,取用日期:2019年12月19日。
    網路溫度計時事網路大數據分析,2018,〈「如果緣份到了。。。」網瘋傳17張佛系圖你中了哪些〉。https://dailyview.tw/popular/detail/1656,取用日期:2020年1月18日。
    劉嘉韻、蔡永彬、陳威廷,2014,〈「勒令轉學」 恐龍校規須廢止〉。https://tw.appledaily.com/headline/daily/20140507/35814155/,取用日期:2019年9月13日。
    Dcard,2015,〈什麼是抽卡?〉。https://faq.dcard.tw/66,取引用日期:2019年12月1日。
    Esther Perel,2013,The secret to desire in a long-term relationship。 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sa0RUmGTCYY,取用日期:2019年5月28日。
    Human Pictogram 2.0,http://pictogram2.com/?lang=en,取用日期:2019年12月26日。
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    社會學系
    106254011
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0106254011
    Data Type: thesis
    DOI: 10.6814/NCCU202001460
    Appears in Collections:[社會學系] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    401101.pdf6172KbAdobe PDF181View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback