English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 112704/143671 (78%)
Visitors : 49750851      Online Users : 1060
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/131821


    Title: 台灣上市櫃公司經營績效的決定-權益法之長期股權投資所扮演的角色
    The Determinants of Performance of Listed Companies in Taiwan : The Role of Equity Method of Long-term Investment
    Authors: 洪若維
    Hong, Ruo-Wei
    Contributors: 翁永和
    Weng, Yung-Ho
    洪若維
    Hong, Ruo-Wei
    Keywords: 權益法之長期股權投資
    經營績效
    轉投資
    Equity Method of Long-term Investment
    Company Performance
    Reinvestment
    Date: 2020
    Issue Date: 2020-09-02 12:52:54 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 在台灣,有超過八成的上市櫃公司進行轉投資,當投資公司持有被投資公司之股權達百分之二十時,必須使用權益法之長期股權投資進行資產的認列及評估。本研究從權益法之長期股權投資作為研究台灣上市櫃公司經營績效的切入點,以權益法之長期股權投資、公司特性、人力資源管理、財務政策與股權結構的構面對其經營績效分析,探討各個解釋變數與被解釋變數之影響力。在OLS模型的建構下,迴歸結果發現「權益法之長期股權投資」、「經營時間」、「人員穩定性」、「研發費用支出」與「股利政策」對經營績效有負向顯著影響;「董監事持股比率」以及「外資持股比率」則對公司的經營績效有正向顯著影響;「資本結構」對公司資產報酬率為負向顯著影響,對公司股東權益報酬率具正向顯著影響。另外,從實證結果得出樣本公司持有權益法之長期股權投資時,將面臨多角化折價的困境。
      More than 80% of public companies have reinvestment in Taiwan. When company hold 20% shares of investees, the company have to recognize the shares they held as the equity method of long-term investment. This study show that company performance is based on the equity method of long-term investment, company characteristics, human resource management, financial policy and equity structure. We will analyze company performance and evaluate the regression results of various dependent variables and independent variables, using the data of the public companies from the Taiwan Economic Journal. Under the OLS model, the regression results show that " the Equity Method of Long-term Investment", "Operating Year", "Employee Turnover", "Research Expense", and "Dividend Policy" have a negative and significant impact on company performance. "Director-to-Supervisor Shareholding Ratio" and "Foreign Shareholding Ratio" have a positive and significant impact on the company performance. "Capital Structure" has a negative and significant impact on the company’s ROA, and a positive and significant impact on the company’s ROE. Finally, the regression results show that the diversification discount occurs in the sample companies holding the equity method of long-term investment.
    Reference: 中文部分
    呂彥慧(2000)。股權結構、監督機制、轉投資、交叉持股與公司經營績效之關係—以台灣新上市公司為例。國立中山大學財務管理學系研究所碩士論文。
    王克陸、包曉天(2002)。企業轉投資與其系統風險關係之研究-台灣紡織業與電子業之比較。中華管理學報,3,65-74。
    洪榮華、陳香如、柯璟瑩(2005)。從代理理論的角度探討董事會特性、股權結構與負債之關聯性。管理與系統,12(4),33-53。
    陳美華、洪世炳(2005)。公司治理、股權結構與公司績效關係之實證研究。企業管理學報,(65),129-153。
    倪衍森、廖容岑(2006)。家族企業負債代理成本及股利政策之研究-以台灣上市公司為例。管理與系統,13(2),153-179。
    李慧曦、陳彥豪(2006)。企業研發投入管理與經營績效指標之研究。績效與策略研究,3(1),100-119。
    林美倫(2007)。研發支出對經營績效及股權評價影響之研究。臺南科大學報(人文管理),26(1),115-133。
    何雍慶、方慧臻(2007)。以資源基礎理論與體制理論觀點探討台灣壽險業新產品進入市場順序之研究。企業管理學報,(73),95-123。
    林亭汝、沈永祺、洪仁財(2008)。台灣TFT-LCD業經營績效之探討:以S-C-P產業組織理論為基礎。臺灣企業績效學刊,2(1),1-29。
    楊朝旭(2008)。集團多角化對研發外溢調節效果之研究。會計評論,(46),31-65。
    郭敏華(2009)。企業分析與評價(初版)。臺北市:新加坡商聖智學習。
    張裕任、王泰昌、吳琮璠(2009)。公司治理機制與外資持股偏好關聯性之探討。管理與系統,16(4),505-532。
    林美鳳、梁嘉紋、金成隆(2010)。公司股權結構與外資持股關係之研究。中山管理評論,18(1),101-142。
    鄭凱文(2010)。長期投資類型與公司績效之研究─以台灣電子產業為例。交通大學科技管理研究所碩士論文。
    王雍智、潘家玲(2010)。資本結構與公司績效關聯性之研究-臺灣股市的新啟示。企業管理學報,(85),71-110。
    王元章、張椿柏(2011)。從核心代理問題的角度探討股權結構,董事會特性對公司價值之影響。證券市場發展季刊,23(2),131-174。
    李淑華、蔡彥卿(2011)。合併財務報表規範、盈餘組成份子持續性及股市理性定價之研究。證券市場發展季刊,23(3),153-198。
    林宛瑩、汪瑞芝、游順合(2012)。研發支出、內部董事與經營績效。會計審計論叢,2(1),61-90。
    李淑華、簡雪芳、蔡彥卿(2014)。權益法長投之投資淨收益:盈餘持續性與股市反應。管理與系統,21(3),483-516。
    經濟部中小企業處(2017)。《2017中小企業白皮書》,39-40。
    詹錦宏、林明薰、溫秀英(2017)。台灣上市公司的股利政策與企業價值。會計學報,7(2),65-94。
    張幸惠(2018)。盈餘管理與公司治理關聯性:以中國銀行業為例。會計審計論叢,8(1),49-80。

    英文部份
    Beams, F. A., Anthony, J. H., Bettinghaus, B., and K.Smith (2012), Advanced Accountin. New Jersey, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.
    Berle, A., and G. Means (1932), The Modern Corporation and Private Property. New York, NY: Macmillan.
    Berger, P.G., and E. Ofek (1995), “Diversification’s Effect on Firm Value,” Journal of Financial Economics, 37(1), 39-65.
    Davies, D., Taylor, R., and C. Savery (2001), “The Role of Appraisal, Remuneration and Training in Improving Staff Relations in The Western Australian Accommodation Industry: A Comparative Study.” Journal of European Industrial Training, 25, 366-373.
    Huang, C. J., and S. Y. Chen (2010), “The Nonlinear Relationship between R&D Investment and Firm Performance: Evidence from Taiwan Electronics Industry,” Tunghai Management Review, 11(1), 35-73.
    Huselid, M. A. (1995), “The Impact of Human Resource Management Practices on Turnover, Productivity, and Corporate Financial Performance.” Academy of Management Journal, 38, 635-672.
    Lang, L.H.P., and R.M. Stulz (1994), “Tobin`s Q, Corporate Diversification, and Firm Performance”, Journal of Political Economy, 102(6), 1248-1280.
    Lieberman, M. B., and D. B. Montgomery (1988), “First-mover Advantages,” Strategic Managament, 5(S1), 41-58.
    Jensen, M. C., and W. H. Meckling (1976), “Theory of The Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure,” Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305-360.
    Jensen, M. C., and R. Ruback (1983), “The Market for Corporate Control: The Scientific Evidence,” Journal of Financial Economics, 11(1-4), 5-50.
    Schumpeter, J. A. (1911), “The Theory of Economic Development: An Inquiry into Profits,” Capital, Credit, Interest, and The Business Cycle. New Jersey, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
    Kaplan, R. S., and D.P. Norton (2001), “Transforming The Balanced Scorecard from Performance Measurement to Strategic Management: Part II,” Accounting Horizons, 15(2), 147-160.
    McConnell, J. J., and H. Servaes (1990), “Additional Evidence on Equity Ownership and Corporate Value,” Journal of Financial Economics, 27(2), 595-612.
    Miller, M. H., and F. Modigliani (1961), “Dividend Policy, Growth, and The Valuation of Shares,” The Journal of Business, 34(4), 411-433.
    Mitton, T. (2004), “Corporate Governance and Dividend Policy in Emerging Markets.” Emerging Markets Review, 5(4),409-426.
    Modigliani, F., and M. H. Miller (1963), “Corporate Income Taxes and The Cost
    of Capital: A Correction,” American Economic Review, 53(3), 433-443.
    Morck, R., Shleifer, A., and R. W. Vishny (1988), “Management Ownership and Market Valuation: An Empirical Analysis,” Journal of Finance Economics, 20(1-2), 293-315.
    Myers, S.C., and N.S. Majluf (1984), “Corporate Financing and Investment Decisions When Firms Have Information That Investors Do Not Have,” Journal of Financial Economics, 13(2), 187-221.
    Robinson, W. T., and C. Fornell (1985), “The Sources of Market Pioneer Advantages in The Consumer Goods Industries” Journal of Marketing Research, 22(3), 297-304.
    Pound, J. (1988), “Proxy Contests and The Efficiency of Shareholder Oversight,” Journal of Financial and Economics, 20(1-2), 237-265.
    Querbes, A., and K. Frenken (2017), “Evolving User Needs and Late-mover Advantage,” Strategic Organization, 15(1), 67-90.
    Shleifer, A., and R.W. Vishny (1986), “Large Shareholders and Corporate Control,”
    Journal of Political Economy, 94(3), 461-488.
    Simmonds, P. G. (1990), “The Combined Diversification Breadth and Mode Dimensions and The Performance of Large Diversified Firms,” Strategic Management Journal, 11(5), 399-410.
    Van Horne, J. C., and J. M. Wachowicz (1998) Fundamentals of Financial Management. New York, NY: Pearson.
    Venkatraman, N., and V. Ramanujam (1985), “Measurement of Business Performance in Strategy Research: A Comparison of Approaches.” Academy of Management Review, 11(4), 801-814.
    Wernerfelt, B. (1984), “A Resource-based View of the Firm,” Strategic Management Journal, 5(2), 171-180.
    Wernerfelt, B., and C. A. Montgomery (1986),” What is an Attractive Industry?” Journal of Management Science, 32 (10), 1223-1370.
    Weston, J. F., and T. E. Copeland (1986), Managerial Finance, New York, NY: The Dryden Press.
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    行政管理碩士學程
    107921077
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0107921077
    Data Type: thesis
    DOI: 10.6814/NCCU202001255
    Appears in Collections:[行政管理碩士學程(MEPA)] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    107701.pdf7288KbAdobe PDF20View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback