English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113485/144472 (79%)
Visitors : 51389316      Online Users : 247
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/132133


    Title: 國際公法上仲裁與授權的弔詭：以「南海仲裁案」為中心
    The Paradoxes of International Arbitration and Delegation: With Special Reference to the South China Sea Arbitration
    Authors: 陳偉華
    Chen, Wei-Hua
    Contributors: 國際關係學報
    Keywords: 國際法制化 ; 國際仲裁 ; 國際授權 ; 南海仲裁案 ; 聯合國海洋法公約 
     International Legalization ; International Arbitration ; International Delegation ; South China Sea Arbitration ; UNCLOS
    Date: 2018-12
    Issue Date: 2020-10-08 09:40:16 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 本文試圖從國際海洋法的強制仲裁制度出發，以「南海仲裁案」為中心進行討論，理解「國際司法」與「國際授權」（international delegations）對於仲裁權限的弔詭現象。基於近年領土爭端交付仲裁的實踐案例，本文探究爭端方走向國際仲裁的考量因素，從理論面討論國際仲裁與授權的概念範疇，釐清兩者對於爭端解決的影響效果。整體而言，本文試圖回答一個核心問題，當國家面對「強制性仲裁」，是否將造成一種國際法上的授權困境？主權國家如何對應？對此，本文以中國「南海仲裁案」立場做為分析對象，據以提出若干建議，期盼提供一種的理論修正的啟示。鑒於後仲裁時期的事實現象，研究發現認為，法律仲裁須有明確的「授權鏈」及辨析「爭端屬性」的辨別標準，俾避免讓仲裁機構做出不被採納、執行的仲裁，減損法律仲裁的聲譽。
    This article takes the Sino-Philippines Arbitration on the South China Sea (SCS) disputes (Philippines v. China) as a case study object and analyzes the compulsory arbitration system of the international law of the sea in theory. Through a review of institution and practice, it observes the paradox of arbitration authority by ＂international justice＂ and ＂international delegations＂. Based on the cases of territorial disputes submitted to arbitration in recent years, this article explores the motivation of dispute parties going to international arbitration, then discusses the conceptual categories of international arbitration and delegations from a theoretical perspective, and clarifies the effect of the two on dispute settlement. This article serves as scholarly advice as to when the country faces ＂compulsory arbitration,＂ will it create a kind of international law`s delegation dilemma? How do sovereign states respond it? Referring to the development trend in the Post-SCS Arbitration period, the result shows that arbitration institutions must establish a clear ＂authorization chain＂ and the criteria for distinguishing the nature of disputes to avoid allowing the tribunals make awards that are not adopted or enforced, thus detracting from the reputation of legal arbitration.
    Relation: 國際關係學報, 46, 1-31
    Data Type: article
    DOI 連結: https://doi.org/10.30413/TJIR.201812_(46).0001 
    DOI: 10.30413/TJIR.201812_(46).0001 
    Appears in Collections:[國際關係學報] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    150.pdf776KbAdobe PDF2264View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback