English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 95906/126496 (76%)
Visitors : 31670424      Online Users : 429
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    政大機構典藏 > 學術期刊 > 會計評論 > 期刊論文 >  Item 140.119/132538
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/132538


    Title: 導入IAS 40對審計公費之影響
    The Effect of IAS 40 on Audit Fees
    Authors: 林嬋娟
    Lin, Chan-Jane
    王炫斌
    Wang, Hsuan-Pin
    Contributors: 會計評論
    Keywords: 投資性不動產 ; 外部鑑價 ; 公允價值模式 ; 審計公費 
     Investment property ; External appraisal ; Fair value model ; Audit fees
    Date: 2019-07
    Issue Date: 2020-11-13 10:21:40 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 國際會計準則第40號「投資性不動產」(簡稱IAS 40)允許企業在投資性不動產之會計處理方面有兩個選擇:(1)關於後續衡量基礎,企業可選擇公允價值模式或成本模式;(2)關於公允價值之依據來源,企業可選擇外部鑑價或企業內部自行評估。本研究以我國導入IAS 40為例,探討前述雙重選擇對於會計師公費之影響。本研究實證結果發現,當企業以成本模式作為後續衡量基礎時,採用外部鑑價有助於減緩審計公費增漲之幅度或使審計公費呈現相對減少之趨勢。惟企業若選擇外部鑑價時,採用公允價值模式並未顯著增加審計公費。本研究實證結果對我國非金融資產導入公允價值會計對審計公費之影響提供初步證據。
    International Accounting Standard 40 (IAS 40) permits firms to have dual choices about the accounting for investment property: (1) For measurement subsequent to initial recognition, firms can choose between a fair value model and a cost model; (2) For fair value determination, firms can choose to employ external appraisers or determine the values themselves. Using Taiwanese data, this study examines the effect of the above choices on audit fees after the adoption of IAS 40. The empirical results show that the audit fees of firms using cost model exhibit a relative decrease or smaller increase if they hire external appraisers, while the audit fees of firms employing external appraisers are not significantly increased if they choose a fair value model. This paper provides preliminary evidence as to the effect on audit fees of implementing fair value accounting for nonfinancial assets.
    Relation: 會計評論, 69, 43-82
    Data Type: article
    DOI 連結: https://doi.org/10.6552/JOAR.201907_(69).0002 
    DOI: 10.6552/JOAR.201907_(69).0002 
    Appears in Collections:[會計評論] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    2.pdf1155KbAdobe PDF17View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback