English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 94586/125118 (76%)
Visitors : 30512116      Online Users : 369
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/132658


    Title: 屬地化管理、中國式分權與地方政府的犯罪治理政策:來自轉型期的證據
    Jurisdictional Management, Decentralization and Local Government Crime Prevention Policies: Evidence from Transitional China
    Authors: 楊貴
    Yang, Gui
    Contributors: 中國大陸研究
    Keywords: 屬地化管理 ; 中國式分權 ; 地方政府行為 ; 犯罪治理政策 
     Jurisdictional Management ; Chinese-style Decentralization ; Local Government Behavior ; Crime Prevention Policy
    Date: 2020-03
    Issue Date: 2020-11-17 16:33:22 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 轉型期中國不斷攀升的社會犯罪成為政府亟需解決的治理難題。屬地化分級犯罪治理下該難題的挑戰在於如何處理好央地政府間的分權關係。利用1997年至2006年30個分省TSCS資料並結合多層線性模型,本文使用政府支出偏好模型實證檢證了經濟分權與政治集權相結合的中國式分權對地方政府犯罪治理政策的影響。本文發現:屬地化分級管理體制下,地方政府傾向採用中央政府的嚴打政策以回應社會犯罪問題。不過,財政分權使得地方政府在犯罪治理上既沒有動力偏向中央政府的嚴打政策,也沒有意願主動採用替代性的胡蘿蔔政策。與此同時,中央政府可以通過政治激勵和官僚整合控制地方政府犯罪治理的政策行為。2006年之前中央政府堅持嚴打政策,官僚整合促使地方政府積極執行嚴打政策,但官僚整合對地方政府是否採用胡蘿蔔政策卻無實質性的影響。
    Rising crime rate has been a major concern for all levels of governments in transitional China. One of the greatest challenges is how to handle the relations between the central and local governments since crime prevention is managed by the jurisdictional governments. This paper sets out a governmental expenditure preference model and uses provincial time-series cross-sectional data over 1997~2006, to investigate the effects of decentralization on local government crime prevention policies. Results from multilevel models show that local governments were responsive to crime by Strike Hard policy. However, local governments were less likely to implement Strike Hard measures or adopt carrots policy when fiscal decentralization was higher. Moreover, bureaucratic control only made sense to local governments when the political incentives of the central government were both strong and clear. During 1997~2006, bureaucratic integration urged local governments to use Strike Hard policy, but had no substantive impact on carrots policy.
    Relation: 中國大陸研究, 63(1), 83-126
    Data Type: article
    DOI 連結: https://doi.org/10.30389/MCS.202003_63(1).0003
    DOI: 10.30389/MCS.202003_63(1).0003
    Appears in Collections:[中國大陸研究 TSSCI] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    20.pdf7744KbAdobe PDF14View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback