English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 110944/141864 (78%)
Visitors : 48035197      Online Users : 936
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/137540


    Title: 實踐公部門線上協力式政策參與之研究：以機關回應態樣與決策行為核心的檢視
    The Practices of E-Collaborative Policy Involvement in Taiwanese Public Sector: An Inspection of Agency`s Response Patterns and Decision-Making Behaviors
    Authors: 張鐙文
    Chang, Teng-Wen
    吳佩靜
    Wu, Pei-Ching
    Contributors: 公共行政學報
    Keywords: 協力式治理 ;協力式政策參與及制定 ;政策論證模式 ;電子連署 ;公共政策網路參與平臺 
    collaborative governance ;collaborative policy involvement and policy-making ;modes of policy argument ;e-petition ;JOIN.gov
    Date: 2021-03
    Issue Date: 2021-10-27
    Abstract: 當協力式政策參與及制定逐漸躍升為公民參與的圭臬之際，但僅有少數研究關注在此一過程中，政府如何透過資通訊科技回應公眾的政策需求，其中，又以分析機關決策依據與邏輯的實證研究相對稀少。對此，本研究認為Dunn所提出的政策論證之架構及模式，恰好提供一個合適的分析框架，能用於檢視政府決策准駁之論述及依據，而有助於填補當前研究的缺口。因之，我們選擇公共政策網路參與平臺上具備全國性電子連署功能的「提點子」項目作為研究個案，並聚焦於已成案且獲得機關完整回覆之政策提案，嘗試藉由內容分析與集群分析等方法，一方面，說明機關採用之政策論證模式；另一方面，辨識及歸納特定的機關回應態樣，並進一步檢視其與不同提案屬性之間的關聯。本研究發現機關普遍採用的政策論證模式是「方法」，最不常用的則是「通則化」，而依據回應之政策論證模式的組合，則可將之劃分為六種特定的機關回應態樣，且各自具備不同的提案屬性，惟機關回應態樣與提案屬性兩者之間並無顯著的關聯。此外，研究亦針對政策、方案、法律及法規等權威性文件的角色與功能，以及機關線上回覆是否符合法定的回應程序與形式等議題進行探討。相關成果均可以作為後續研究精進與未來實務推動之參考。
    While collaborative policy involvement and policy-making have become the golden rules of public participation, few studies have focused on how the government responds to the public`s policy requests through ICTs in the process of collaborative policy involvement and policy-making, not to mention analyzing the underlying reasons and logic were taken by public agencies. Therefore, we treat the theory of policy argument and its modes mentioned by Dunn as a suitable analytical framework and tool for inspecting the underlying reasons and logic of public policy-making. The 152 cases of e-petition on the JOIN.gov platform were selected for this study. We conducted content analysis and cluster analysis to illustrate the models of policy argument used by the government, and identified their specific response patterns; we also explored the relationship between the different response patterns and the attributions of the petitions. According to current data, ＂Method＂ is the most dominant policy argument mode used by the government, and ＂Generalization＂ is the least dominant. Six different response patterns and their own attributions are identified, although there is no significant relationship between them. This study also discusses the role and function of ＂authority documents＂ (i.e., laws, regulations and policies), and analyzes the procedure and form of the government`s response. The results from our study provide follow-up academics and practitioners more insight into the reality of e-collaborative policy involvement in Taiwan.
    Relation: 公共行政學報, 60, 47-96
    Data Type: article
    DOI 連結: https://doi.org/10.30409/JPA.202103_(60).0002
    DOI: 10.30409/JPA.202103_(60).0002
    Appears in Collections:[公共行政學報 TSSCI] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    45.pdf1756KbAdobe PDF2236View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback