English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 109952/140887 (78%)
Visitors : 46344461      Online Users : 323
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/139595


    Title: 立法學之概念;範疇界定及功能
    Concept, Scope Definition and Function of Legisprudence
    Authors: 林明鏘
    Contributors: 法學評論
    Keywords: 立法學概念;立法學範疇;立法程序;立法技術;立法影響評估;立法原則;立法缺陷;立法學功能;德國新行政法;依法行政
    Concept of Legisprudence;Scope of Legisprudence;Legislative Procedure;Legislation Technique;Assessment of Legislative Impact;Principle of Legislation;Legislative Defect;Function of Legisprudence;German New Administrative Law;Law-Based Administration
    Date: 2020-06
    Issue Date: 2022-04-08 10:13:19 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 立法學在我國傳統公法學界咸認非屬公法學研究領域內之課題，影響所及，致國內憲法或行政法對立法學的研究成果稍嫌不足。本論文參酌德國 ; 奧地利及瑞士之立法學研究成果，參酌國內立法技術及立法程序之基本研究成果，擬從最基本之立法學概念 ; 研究範疇及其功能出發，再深入分析我國立法學應該研究的四大課題：立法程序 ; 立法技術 ; 立法影響評估及立法基本原則（含成文與不成文之基本原則），並以我國實際案例加以佐證分析，希望能夠建立我國立法學研究之範疇外，並能喚醒注意：立法學之研究是一門跨學科領域之研究，且與德國進行之新行政法學研究，息息相關，立法學之研究對我國「依法行政」及「依法審判」均將有巨大之助益，並得提升法規範之效力。
    From the perspective of public law, legislative science is never a topic in the research field of public law. As a result, there has been insufficient research on legislative science based on the administrative law or the Constitution of the R.O.C. This paper has referred to the results of the research on legislative science conducted in Germany, Austria, and Switzerland, intending to start with the most fundamental concept, research scope, and function of the legislative science to thoroughly analyze the four topics that should have been researched in the field of legislative science: Legislative procedures, legislation techniques, assessment of legislative impact, and basic principles of legislation (including both written and unwritten basic principles). With the in-depth analysis supported by substantial case studies, this paper seeks to not only establish the research scope for legislative science in the R.O.C., but also make people well aware that the research on legislative science is cross-disciplinary and closely connected with the research on new administrative law conducted in Germany. The research on legislative science will be greatly beneficial to the “lawbased administration” and “trial by law” systems domestically.
    Relation: 法學評論, 161, 71-134
    Data Type: article
    DOI 連結: https://doi.org/10.3966/102398202020060161002
    DOI: 10.3966/102398202020060161002
    Appears in Collections:[政大法學評論 TSSCI] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    18.pdf2319KbAdobe PDF2112View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback