English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  全文筆數/總筆數 : 111200/142120 (78%)
造訪人次 : 48102307      線上人數 : 715
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜尋範圍 查詢小技巧：
  • 您可在西文檢索詞彙前後加上"雙引號"，以獲取較精準的檢索結果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜尋，建議至進階搜尋限定作者欄位，可獲得較完整資料
    •  進階搜尋


    請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/139598


    題名: 效率市場概念於美國公司法上之應用
    The Application of Efficient Market Under the U.S. Corporate Law
    作者: 黃朝琮
    貢獻者: 法學評論
    關鍵詞: 效率資本市場假說;資訊效率;基礎效率;詐欺市場理論;公司控制權市場;股東賦權;內線交易基礎理論;公平價格
    Efficient Capital Market Hypothesis;Informational Efficiency;Fundamental Efficiency;Fraud on the Market Theory;Shareholder Empowerment;Insider Trading Theory;Fair Price
    日期: 2020-09
    上傳時間: 2022-04-08 10:14:35 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 公司作為一種經濟組織態樣，不難想見其理論發展深受經濟學相關理論影響，其中又以效率市場為當中核心。為觀察效率市場於公司法上之應用，本文以效率資本市場假說為中心，探索其在金融經濟學文獻上的發展，以描繪效率市場概念之內涵及其侷限，而在此一基礎上，觀察此一概念在美國法上詐欺市場理論 ; 經營者監督以及內線交易基礎理論等脈絡中之應用，提出「效率」與「市場」在概念上具有歧義性，且有其極限，再進一步將該等觀察應用於股份收買請求權之公平收買價格的討論以為驗證。儘管效率市場在美國公司法理論上的地位有所消長，我國相關論述並不多見，此固然可避免陷入美國法過度盲從效率市場之弊，但亦錯失就此概念進行思辯檢討的機會，則有所不足。
    As corporate is deemed an economic organization, the theory of corporate law is deeply affected by economics — especially the concept of efficient market. In order to observe the application of efficient market in the corporate law, this article explores the development of efficient capital market hypothesis (the “ECMH”) to depict the ideal of efficient market, its implications, and limitations. Using fraud on the market theory, scrutiny of management, and insider trading theory as examples, this article observes the application of efficient market in the U.S. corporate law, concluding that the concept of efficient market should be cautiously applied. Based on the above observations, this article further extends its exploration to the determination of fair price. As of now, few discussions about the application of efficient market exist in Taiwan. While such insufficiency allows the corporate law theory in Taiwan to avoid the overextension of efficient market, the opportunity for examination and the insights from such examination is lost as a result.
    關聯: 法學評論, 162, 1-92
    資料類型: article
    DOI 連結: https://doi.org/10.3966/102398202020090162001
    DOI: 10.3966/102398202020090162001
    顯示於類別:[政大法學評論 TSSCI] 期刊論文

    文件中的檔案:

    檔案 大小格式瀏覽次數
    21.pdf2337KbAdobe PDF2162檢視/開啟


    在政大典藏中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回饋