English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 110944/141864 (78%)
Visitors : 48034628      Online Users : 931
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/143691


    Title: 國軍部隊權力距離與工作鑲嵌對建言行為之影響 —以北部實兵單位為例
    The Influence of Power Distance and Job Embedding in the National Army on Voice Behavior — An Example of Northern Battalion
    Authors: 林宥辰
    Lin, Yu-Chen
    Contributors: 羅光達
    LUO, GUANG-DA
    林宥辰
    Lin, Yu-Chen
    Keywords: 權力距離
    工作鑲嵌
    建言行為
    Power distance
    Job embeddedness
    Voice behavior
    Date: 2022
    Issue Date: 2023-03-09 18:06:37 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 在明確階級制度的軍事機關中,管理風格多以威權方式要求部屬,於過往領導統御經驗中,亦將「軍令如山」奉為圭臬。如何使部屬發自內心的認同單位,進而以增強團隊及改善工作現況為出發點,主動提出具建設性的建議,打破官大學問大的窠臼值得深入剖析。基於此,本研究以北部某實兵單位為研究對象,探討軍事機關官士兵中權力距離、工作鑲嵌對建言行為的影響程度。
    研究方法採問卷調查法,針對國軍北部某實兵單位實施,問卷透過線上電子及紙本方式共發放計305份,有效問卷回收計269份,有效回收率達88.2%。再使用SPSS 26及AMOS 28統計軟體分析資料,分別採用描述性統計分析、信度分析、因素分析、差異性分析、相關分析與迴歸分析等,藉以驗證所提出之各項假說是否成立。相關研究發現(1)權力距離與工作鑲嵌對建言行為達正向顯著關聯性;(2)權力距離與工作鑲嵌子構面(契合及連結)對建言行為子構面(促進性及抑制性)達正向顯著關聯性。最後提出實務管理想法及相關研究建議供後續發想,希冀能提供國軍部隊實務之參酌。
    In military institutions with a clear hierarchy, the management style mostly requires subordinates in an authoritarian manner. In the past experience of leadership, "military orders are unquestionable” is also regarded as the standard. How to make subordinates identify with the team from the bottom of their hearts, and willing to strengthen and improve the current situation of the work by proactively putting forward constructive suggestions is worth for further analysis. Base on the view of the point, the research would like to discuss Job embeddedness and the degree of influence of voice behavior in a military unit in Northern part of the national army in Taiwan.
    The research method adopts the questionnaire survey method, which is implemented for a certain military unit in the northern part of the national army. A total of 305 questionnaires were distributed through online electronic and paper methods, and 269 valid questionnaires were returned, with an effective recovery rate of 88.2%. Then through SPSS 26 and AMOS 28 statistical software data analysis, using descriptive statistical analysis, reliability analysis, factor analysis, difference analysis, correlation analysis and regression analysis, etc., to verify the validity of the various hypotheses proposed in this research, Relevant studies have found that (1) Power Distance and Job Embeddedness have a positive and significant impact on voice behavior; (2) Power Distance and Job Embeddedness sub-components (Fit and Link) have a positive and significant impact on voice behavior sub-components (Promotive and Prohibitive) influences. Finally, management implications and follow-up research suggestions are put forward, hoping to provide reference for the national army in practical management.
    Reference: 壹、中文文獻
    陸軍總司令部(1999)。陸軍作戰要綱。桃園:陸軍總司令部。
    國防部總督察長室(2017)。國軍軍風紀維護實施規定。台北:國防部總督察長室。
    中華民國108年國防報告書編纂委員會(2019)。中華民國108年國防報告書。台北:國防部。
    中華民國110年國防報告書編纂委員會(2021)。中華民國110年國防報告書。台北: 國防部。
    王議賢、周麗芳、李芸蘋、葉羿廷(2020)。建言行為與員工創新行為績效:一個探討促進性建言、抑制性建言、領導與部屬交換關係與員工創新行為績效的三階交互作用模型。人力資源管理學報,20(1),1-26。
    王豫萱、紀乃文、蘇妙悅 (2021)。探討員工組織鑲嵌形態與其對任務績效, 工作態度與行為的差異化影響。人力資源管理學報,21(1),1-26。
    李惠芳、高紹源、張良漢(2010)。休閒知覺自由量表驗證性因素分析:以競爭模式策略觀點。運動休閒管理學報,7(1),187-199。
    李佳逸、高煌彥、余坤東、 林宜真、諸承明(2014)。新進員工社會化與工作鑲嵌、離職意願之關聯探討以臺灣海運業為例。航運季刊,23(3),25-45。
    李庭閣、嚴國晉、費吳琛、蔡佩容(2021)。家長式領導與部屬建言行為之關係:深層演出與表層演出之角色。人力資源管理學報,21(2),75-99。
    吳萬益、林志成、傅貞夙(2006)。領導型態與組織文化對組織承諾與組織績效影響之研究-以台灣不同國籍製藥廠為例。企業管理學報,71,35-76。
    何瑞枝、蔡啟通(2018)。不當督導與員工建言行為: 建言效能的中介與政治技能的調節效果。管理學報,35(3),355-382。
    周麗芳、任金剛、林守紀(2013)。轉型領導與建言行為:文化價值觀的關鍵角色。組織與管理,6(2),115-159。
    林金賢、陳怡伶、吳文淵(2015)。基本員工自願性離職之預測。商略學報,7(1),35-52。
    林守紀、周麗芳、任金剛、曾春榮(2017)。員工建言行為: 回顧與未來。人力資源管理學報,17(1),1-33。
    紀乃文、石蕙菱、郭智涵(2015)。建言或諫言? 探討員工正,負向心情與建言行為的關係: 轉換型與交易型領導的干擾效果。管理學報,32(1),43-68。
    高鳳霞、鄭伯壎(2014)。職場工作壓力:回顧與展望。人力資源管理學報,14(1),77-102。
    高凱(2017)。行政學的基本概念與思潮演進。行政學(概要),1-30。
    陳彥君、沈其泰(2015)。檢驗主管認同與權力距離傾向對於真誠領導與服務品質之關係的效果。人力資源管理學報,15(1),1-25。
    郭彥谷(2020)。企業形象,知覺風險與滿意度之關聯性研究:以台北市中醫診所為例。中醫本草芳香療法期刊,4(1),5-27。
    陳順宇(2009)。迴歸分析: SPSS, STATISTICA 軟體操作。三民書局。
    陳寬裕、王正華(2021)。論文統計分析實務: SPSS與AMOS的運用。五南圖書出版股份有限公司。
    張瓊玲(2001)。科層組織的反功能現象與問題探討。行政管理學報,(3),111-130。
    黃哲彬(2008)。後科層體制對學校革新之啟示。學校行政雙月刊,55,48-69。
    許順旺、林顯邦、張姮燕(2011)。國際觀光旅館客房部門員工壓力源、組織認同與績效表現之相關研究:以調適行為為干擾變項。人力資源管理學報,11(1),1-25。
    彭台光、高月慈、林鉦棽(2006)。管理研究中的共同方法變異:問題本質、影響、測試和補救。管理學報,23(1),77-98。
    傅凱若 、郭庭宇(2021)。公務人員為何沉默?公部門權力距離與員工沉默行為對工作滿意度之影響。文官制度,13(1),35-66。
    鄭伯壎 (2005)。華人組織行為研究的方向與策略: 由西化到本土化。本土心理學研究,24,191-245。
    廖巍庭(2021)。探討國軍主管家長式領導與部屬責任感及建言行為之關係:以知覺安全氛圍為調節變項。國防管理學報,42(1)。
    蔡松純、鄭伯壎、周麗芳、姜定宇、鄭弘岳(2009)。領導者上下關係認定與部屬利社會行為: 權力距離之調節效果。中華心理學刊,51(1),121-138。
    劉娜婷、蔡秉毅、徐雅惠、吳肇展(2014)。權威領導與職場偏差行為之關係: 主管與部屬交換關係差異與個人文化價值觀所扮演的角色。組織與管理,7(2),1-50。
    劉漢宗(2019)。情緒耗竭與工作投入之關係:以心理資本、工作鑲嵌與知覺主管支持為調節變項。國立中山大學人力資源管理研究所,未出版,高雄。
    謝念潔(2016)。高承諾人力資源管理與建言行為關係之研究-以工作鑲嵌為中介變項。國立清華大學人力資源與數位學習科技研究所,未出版,新竹。

    貳、英文文獻
    Atwater, L., Wang, M., Smither, J. W., & Fleenor, J. W. (2009). Are cultural characteristics associated with the relationship between self and others’ ratings of leadership? Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(4), 876.
    Bateman, T. S., & Organ, D. W. 1983. Job satisfaction and the good soldier: The relationship between affect and employee citizenship. Academy of Management Journal, 26, 587-595.
    Botero, I. C., & Van Dyne, L. (2009). Employee voice behavior: Interactive effects of LMX and power distance in the United States and Colombia. Management Communication Quarterly, 23(1), 84-104.
    Chang, W. C., & Weng, L. C. (2018).Ethical leadership,Voice,And power distance:A multi-level and multi-Source Examination with military personnel in Taiwan. 品質學報, 25(4), 271-288.
    Clugston, M., Howell, J. P., & Dorfman, P. W. (2000). Does cultural socialization predict multiple bases and foci of commitment?Journal of management, 26(1), 5-30.
    Collinson, D. (2005). Dialectics of leadership. Human Relations, 58(11), 1419-1442.
    Crossley, C. D., Bennett, R. J., Jex, S. M., & Burnfield, J. L. (2007). Development of a global measure of job embeddedness and integration into a traditional model of voluntary turnover. Journal of applied Psychology, 92(4), 1031.
    Dorfman, P. W., & Howell, J. P. (1988). Dimensions of national culture and effective leadership patterns: Hofstede revisited. Advances in international comparative management, 3(1), 127-150.
    Farh, J. L., Hackett, R. D., & Liang, J. (2007). Individual-level cultural values as moderators of perceived organizational support–employee outcome relationships in China: Comparing the effects of power distance and traditionality. Academy of management journal, 50(3), 715-729.
    Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of marketing research, 18(1), 39-50.
    Gorden, W. I. (1988).Range of employee voice.Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal,1(4), 283-299.
    Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (1998). Multivariate data analysis . Uppersaddle River. Multivariate Data Analysis (5th ed) Upper Saddle River, 5(3), 207-219.
    Hirschman, A. O. (1970). Exit, voice, and loyalty: Responses to decline in firms, organizations, and states, Vol. 25, Harvard university press.
    Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture and organizations. International studies of management & organization, 10(4), 15-41.
    Hofstede, G., Hofstede, G. J., & Minkov, M. (2005). Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind , Vol. 2, New York: Mcgraw-hill.
    Hofstede, G., & Minkov, M. (2013). VSM 2013. Values survey module.
    Holtom, B. C., & Inderrieden, E. J. (2006). Integrating the unfolding model and job embeddedness model to better understand voluntary turnover. Journal of managerial issues, 435-452.
    Hom, P. W., Tsui, A. S., Wu, J. B., Lee, T. W., Zhang, A. Y., Fu, P. P., & Li, L. (2009). Explaining employment relationships with social exchange and job embeddedness. Journal of Applied psychology, 94(2), 277.
    Lambert, E. G., Minor, K. I., Wells, J. B., & Hogan, N. L.(2016). Social support`s relationship to correctional staff job stress, job involvement, job satisfaction, and organizational commitment. The Social Science Journal, 53(1), 22-32.
    Lee, T. W., Mitchell, T. R., Sablynski, C. J., Burton, J. P., & Holtom, B. C. (2004). The effects of job embeddedness on organizational citizenship, job performance, volitional absences, and voluntary turnover. Academy of management journal, 47(5), 711-722.
    LePine, J. A., & Van Dyne, L. (1998). Predicting voice behavior in work groups. Journal of Applied Psychology,83(6), 853.
    Lewin, K. (1951). Intention, will and need.
    Liang, J., Farh, C. I., & Farh, J. L. (2012). Psychological antecedents of promotive and prohibitive voice: A two-wave examination.Academy of Management Journal,55(1), 71-92.
    Liu, W., Zhu, R., & Yang, Y. (2010). I warn you because I like you: Voice behavior, employee identifications, and transformational leadership. The Leadership Quarterly,21(1), 189-202.
    Luchak, A. A. (2003). What kind of voice do loyal employees use?. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 41(1), 115-134.
    Maynes, T. D., & Podsakoff, P. M. (2014). Speaking more broadly: An examination of the nature, antecedents, and consequences of an expanded set of employee voice behaviors. Journal of Applied Psychology,99(1), 87.
    Merton, R. K. (1963). Bureaucratic structure and personality.
    Meyer, J. P., & Allen, N. J.(1991). A three Component Conceptualization of Organizational Commitment, Human Resource Management Review, 1(1), 61-89.
    Mitchell, T. R., Holtom, B. C., Lee, T. W., Sablynski, C. J., & Erez, M.(2001). Why people stay: Using job embeddedness to predict voluntary turnover. Academy of management journal, 44(6), 1102-1121.
    Morrison, E. W., & Milliken, F. J. (2000). Organizational silence: A barrier to change and development in a pluralistic world. Academy of Management review, 25(4), 706-725.
    Nunnally, J. (1978). Psychometric methods. 1978. In: New York: McGraw-Hill.
    Ployhart, R.E., Schneider, B. and Schmitt, N. (2006). Staffing Organizations: Contemporary Practice and Theory, 3rd Edition, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates: NJ.
    Rhee, J., Dedahanov, A., & Lee, D. (2014). Relationships among power distance, collectivism, punishment, and acquiescent, defensive, or prosocial silence. Social Behavior and Personality: an international journal, 42(5), 705-720.
    Smith, A. (1937). The wealth of nations, Vol. 11937.
    Van Dyne, L. V., Ang, S., & Botero, I. C. (2003). Conceptualizing employee silence and employee voice as multidimensional constructs. Journal of Management Studies,40(6), 1359-1392.
    Weber, M. (1949). Max Weber on the methodology of the social sciences. Free Press.
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    行政管理碩士學程
    110921317
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0110921317
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[行政管理碩士學程(MEPA)] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    131701.pdf3964KbAdobe PDF2160View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback