Loading...
|
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/152938
|
| Title: | 花蓮縣國民小學校長分布式領導、教師組織承諾與學校效能關係之研究
A Study of the Relationships among the Principals' Distributed Leadership, Teachers' Organizational Commitment and School Effectiveness of Elementary Schools in Hualien County |
| Authors: | 薛禾渝 |
| Contributors: | 秦夢群
薛禾渝 |
| Keywords: | 校長分布式領導
教師組織承諾
學校效能
principals’ distributed leadership
teachers' organizational commitment
school effectiveness |
| Date: | 2024 |
| Issue Date: | 2024-08-05 14:56:11 (UTC+8) |
| Abstract: | 本研究旨在瞭解當前花蓮縣國民小學校長分布式領導、教師組織承諾與學校效能之現況。分析不同背景變項於花蓮縣國民小學教師之校長分布式領導、教師組織承諾與學校效能的差異情形，並探討校長分布式領導、教師組織承諾與學校效能之關係，最後探究校長分布式領導與教師組織承諾對學校效能之預測力分析。
本研究採用問卷調查法，共計抽樣 30 所花蓮縣國民小學，發出423 份問卷，共有351 份有效問卷，問卷有效率達83%。問卷調查結果以敘述性統計、t檢定、單因子變異數分析、皮爾森積差相關與多元逐步迴歸之統計方法加以分析與探討。
本研究之數據分析結果如下：
一、花蓮縣國民小學教師知覺校長分布式領導為中高程度。
二、花蓮縣國民小學教師知覺教師組織承諾為中高程度。
三、花蓮縣國民小學教師知覺學校效能為中高程度。
四、花蓮縣國民小學教師因學校規模之不同，於校長分布式領導具有顯著差異。
五、花蓮縣國民小學教師因年齡之不同，於教師組織承諾具有顯著差異。
六、花蓮縣國民小學教師因現任職務與學校規模之不同，於學校效能具有顯著差異。
七、花蓮縣國民小學教師知覺校長分布式領導、教師組織承諾與學校效能及其各分層面，彼此具有正相關的關係。
本研究依據研究結果提出建議與討論，以供教育行政機關、學校單位以及未來相關研究者後續之參考。
The purpose of the study was to investigate the current development of principals’ distributed leadership, teachers' organizational commitment and school effectiveness of elementary schools in Hualien County. And to analyze the difference between teachers of different background variables, and to explore the relationship among the three variables. The study has aimed to predict school effectiveness through principals’ distributed leadership and teachers' organizational commitment.
Through the use of questionnaire survey method, a total of 60 elementary schools in Hualien County were sampled, 423 questionnaires were sent out, and a total of 351 valid questionnaires were obtained, with an effective rate of 83%. All data were analyzed by the methods of descriptive statistics, independent t-test, one-way-ANOVA, Pearson product-moment correlation, and multiple stepwise regression analysis.
The conclusion of this study are as follows:
1.Elementary school teacher’s perception of principals’ distributed leadership is above average in Hualien County.
2.Elementary school teacher’s perception of teachers' organizational commitment is above average in Hualien County.
3.Elementary school teacher’s perception of school effectiveness is above average in Hualien County.
4.There is significant difference in the elementary school teacher’s perception of principals’ distributed leadership in terms of scale of school in Hualien County.
5.There is significant difference in the elementary school teacher’s perception of teachers' organizational commitment in terms of age in Hualien County.
6.There is significant difference in the elementary school teacher’s perception of school effectiveness in terms of position and scale of school in Hualien County.
7.There is a positive correlation among principals’ distributed leadership, teachers' organizational commitment and school effectiveness. |
| Reference: | 中文文獻
何嘉惠（2018）。國民小學校長分布式領導、教師彰權益能與教學創新關係之研究（博士論文）。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/scq25d
吳清山（1998）。學校效能研究。五南。
吳清山、林天祐（2005）。組織承諾。教育研究月刊，136，159。
呂紹弘（2020）。國民中學校長分布式領導、學校組織文化與學校創新經營效能關係之研究（博士論文）。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/c9rpzm
李昆憲（2022）。國民小學校長數位科技領導與學校效能關係之研究-以學校競爭優勢與教師組織承諾為中介變項（博士論文）。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/v87826
李重毅（2012）。校長分布式領導、教師專業社群運作與學校創新經營效能關係之研究（博士論文）。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/9jhts8
李晏禎（2017）。高雄市國民中學校長分布式領導、 教師工作投入與學校效能關係之研究（碩士論文）。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/99c2w9
邱馨儀（1995）。國民小學學校組織文化與教師組織承諾關係之研究（碩士論文）。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/2rs3v7
周竹一（2023）。國民小學校長分布式領導、教師專業發展與學校效能關係之研究（碩士論文）。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/7e37x3
周昌柏（2007）。國小學校組織文化與教師組織承諾之研究。學校行政，49，84-106。https://doi.org/10.6423/HHHC.200705.0084
周碧惠（2023）。國民小學校長轉型領導與學校效能、 教師組織承諾、工作滿意度相關研究之後設分析（博士論文）。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/3u53r4
林春如（2008）。屏東縣國民小學校長服務領導、教師組織承諾與學校效能關係之研究（碩士論文）。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/6a4yjc
林奕成（2018）。國民小學校長分布式領導、教師專業學習社群與學校效能關係之研究（博士論文）。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/x67v4q
林湘芸（2022）。國小校長多元型模領導、教師領導、教師組織承諾 與學校效能徑路模式建構與驗證研究（博士論文）。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/3x2cm9
洪國芳（2022）。國民小學校長分布式領導、學校組織公平與教師組織承諾關係之研究（碩士論文）。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/2cev62
胡士雄（2016）。越南胡志明市高級中學校長分布式領導、教師知覺組織支持與教師組織公民行為關係之研究（博士論文）。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/42gdjt
范熾文（2007）。教師組織承諾：概念、發展、類別及其啟示。學校行政，50，128-144。https://doi.org/10.6423/HHHC.200707.0128
涂棟隆（2013）。國民小學校長轉型領導與教師組織承諾關係之研究―以高雄市為例。學校行政雙月刊，86，62-65。
徐合慶（2015）。國小校長分布式領導、教師組織承諾 與ICT運用關係之研究（碩士論文）。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/pdt58s
陳世栓（2021）。臺中市國民中學校長分布式領導、教師知覺組織支持與學校效能關係之研究（碩士論文）。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/d6x5vm
陳明章（2015）。校長服務領導、教師組織承諾、教師專業成長與學校效能關係之研究（碩士論文）。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/qbt39g
陳慧儒（2017）。臺北市國民小學校長分布式領導與學校效能關係之研究（碩士論文）。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/yjrx9a
袁亭雅（2020）。校長分布式領導與學校效能關係之後設分析（碩士論文）。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/pf74qu
秦夢群（2010）。教育領導理論與應用。五南。
秦夢群（2011）。教育行政理論與模式。五南。
秦夢群、黃敏榮（2016）。高級中等學校分布式領導、學校創新經營與學校效能關係之研究。教育與心理研究，39（2），1-25。
翁敏芳、賴志峰（2014）。臺中市國民小學兼任行政教師工作壓力與組織承諾相關之研究。學校行政，93，210-232。
張奕華、顏弘欽（2012）。學校分散式領導構面之探究分析: 領導者、追隨者與情境三元互動之檢證。教育理論與實踐學刊，25(2)，225-254。https://doi.org/10.6776/JEPR.201212.0225
教育部（2012）。中華民國師資培育白皮書-發揚師道、百年樹人。https://reurl.cc/L6jjDK
許聰顯（2013）。國民小學校長分布式領導、學校組織公平與教師組織公民行為之關係（博士論文）。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/twq65t
康馨尹（2010）。桃園縣國民小學教師組織承諾與學校效能關係之研究（博士論文）。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/p6ewte
曾南薰（1998）。我國教師組織承諾之整合分析（碩士論文）。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/tjh47x
黃明裕（2017）。國小教師知覺校長分布式領導、教師幸福感與學校效能關係之研究（博士論文）。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/u55w45
劉乙儀（2017）。幼兒園園長分布式領導、教師領導與教師專業發展關係之研究—以中彰投地區為例（博士論文）。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/69bbvn
劉姿君（2016）。大臺北地區國民小學分布式領導對教育成效影響之研究（博士論文）。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/39r2pt
蔡宗典（2013）。新北市國民小學教師組織承諾與學校效能關係之研究（碩士論文）。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/7c34up
蔡玲玲（2014）。私立高中職學校校長分布式領導、學校組織健康與學校效能關係之研究（博士論文）。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/9n6b8m
蔡琇韶（2017）。國民小學校長正向領導、教師正向心理資本、教師組織承諾與學校效能關係之研究（博士論文）。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/hu8xad
蔡進雄（2000）。轉型領導與學校效能。師大書苑。
蔡進雄（2005）。超越轉型領導：國民中小學校長轉型領導影響教師組織承諾之研究。國民教育研究集刊，13，37-63。
蔡舒文（2012）。臺北市國民小學校長分布式領導與教師組織承諾關係之研究（碩士論文）。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/9876ph
鄭友泰（2023）。桃園市國民小學校長分布式領導教師組織公民行為與CRPD導向融合教育成效關係之研究（博士論文）。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/n469vs
賴志峰（2008）。分布式領導理論之探究—學校領導者、追隨者和情境的交互作用。國民教育研究學報，20，87-113。
蘇恆毅（2015）。國民中學校長分布式領導與教師組織承諾關係之研究（碩士論文）。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/45k852
蘇銘勳（2014）。國民小學校長正向領導與學校效能相關之研究－以教師組織承諾與學校組織氣氛為中介變項（博士論文）。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/uugzdk
英文文獻
Abd Rabo, A., & Hashaikeh, S. (2020). Assessing School Principals’ Perceptions of School Effectiveness in the Palestinian Schools. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8(11), 5536-5546.
Akoto, M. A., & Allida, D. (2018). Relationship of school climate and organizational teacher's commitment. International Book Market Service Ltd, Scholar's Press.
Allen, N. J., & Meyer, J. P. (1991). A three-component conceptualization of organizational commitment. Human Resource Management Review, 1, 61-89.
Allen, N. J., & Meyer, J. P. (1996). Affective, continuance, and normative commitment to the organization: An examination of construct validity. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 49, 252-276.
Becker, H. S. (1960). Notes on the concepts of commitment. American Journal of Sociology, 66(1), 32-40.
Bennett, N., Harvey, J.A., Wise, C. & Woods, P.A. (2003). Distributed Leadership. A Desk Study.
Bishara, S. (2017). School effectiveness and student achievement. International Journal of Contemporary Research and Review, 8(02), 20171-20188.
Bogler, R., & Somech, A. (2004). Influence of teacher empowerment on teachers’ organizational commitment, professional commitment and organizational citizenship behavior in schools. Teaching and Teacher Education, 20(3), 277-289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2004.02.003
Bolden, R., Petrov, G., & Gosling, J. (2009). Distributed Leadership in Higher Education: Rhetoric and Reality. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 37(2), 257–277. https://doi-org.proxyone.lib.nccu.edu.tw:8443/10.1177/1741143208100301
Coleman, J. S. (1966). Equality of educational opportunity summary report (Vol. 1). US Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, Office of Education.
Cruise S. D., & Louis S. K. (2009). Building strong cultures: A leaders guide to change. Corwin Press.
Dee, J. R., Henkin, A. B., & Singleton, C. A. (2006). Organizational commitment of teachers in urban schools: Examining the effects of team structures. Urban education, 41(6), 603-627.
Edmonds, R. R. (1982). Programs of school improvement: An overview.
Elmore, R. (2000) Building a new structure for school leadership. Albert Shanker Institute.
Firestone W. A., Pennell J. R. (1993). Teacher commitment, working conditions and differential incentive policies. Review of Educational Research, 63, 489-525.
Getahun, T., Tefera, B.F., & Burichew, A.H. (2016). Teacher's job satisfaction and its relationship with organizational commitment in Ethiopian primary schools: Focus on primary schools of bonga town. European Scientific Journal, 12(13), 380-401.
Gibb, J. R, Platts, G. N., & Miller, L. F. (1951). Dynamics of participative groups. John S. Swift.
Goleman, D. (2002). The new leaders: Transforming the art of leadership into the science of results. Little Brown.
Gordon, Z. V. (2005). The effect of distributed leadership on student achievement. Central Connecticut State University.
Gottfredson, D. C. (2000). Schools and delinquency. Cambridge University Press.
Gronn, P. (2002). Distributed leadership as a unit of analysis. The Leadership Quarterly, 13(4), 423-451. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1048-9843(02)00120-0
Grusky, O. (1966). Career mobility and organizational commitment. Administrative Science Quarterly, 10(4), 488-503.
Harris, A. & Lambert, L. (2003). Building Leadership Capacity for School Improvement. Open University Press.
Harris, A. (2005). Leading or misleading: Distributed leadership and school improvement. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 37, 255–265.
Harris, A., Jones, M. & Baba, S. (2013). Distributed leadership and digital collaborative learning. Br J Educ Technol, 44: 926-939. https://doi-org.proxyone.lib.nccu.edu.tw:8443/10.1111/bjet.12107
Heck R. H., & Hallinger P. (2009). Assessing the contribution of distributed leadership to school improvement and growth in math achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 46, 659-689.
Hulpia, H., Devos, G., & Rosseel, Y. (2009). The relationship between the perception of distributed leadership in secondary schools and teachers' and teacher leaders' job satisfaction and organizational commitment. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 2(3), 291-317. https://doi.org/10.1080/09243450902909840
Jones, S., Harvey, M., Lefoe, G., & Ryland, K. (2014). Synthesising theory and practice: Distributed leadership in higher education. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 42(5), 603-619.
Jones, S., Rylan, K., Harvey, M., Lefoe, G., Schneider, A., & Applebee, A. (2012). Lessons learnt: identifying synergies in distributed leadership projects. Australian Learning and Teaching Council.
Kanter, R. M. (1968). Commitment and social organization: A study of commitment mechanisms in utopian communities. American Sociological Review, 499-517.
Leithwood, K., Jantzi, D., & Steinbach, R. (1999). Changing leadership for changing times. Open University Press.
Lezotte, L. (2001). Revolutionary and evolutionary: The effective schools movement. MI: Effective Schools Products, Ltd, 5.
Lovell, C. W. (2009). Principal efficacy: An investigation of school principals' sense of efficacy and indicators of school effectiveness.
Loyce, O. C., & Victor, A. A. (2017). Principals' application of instructional leadership practices for secondary school effectiveness in Oyo State. Online Submission, 13(1), 32-44.
Marks H. M., Louis K. S. (1997). Does teacher empowerment affect the classroom? Teachers’ work and student experiences in restructuring schools. American Journal of Education, 107, 532-575.
Morris, J. H., & Sherman, J. D. (1981). Generalizability of an organizational commitment model. Academy of Management Journal, 24(3), 512-526.
Mowday, R. T., Steers, R. M., & Porter, L. W. (1979). The measurement of organizational commitment. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 14, 224-247. https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-8791(79)90072-1
National College for School Leadership. (2004). Distributed Leadership Pack. National College for School Leadership.
Nsubuga, Y. K. K. (2003). Development of secondary education in Uganda: Prospects and challenges. A paper presented at the first regional conference on secondary education in Africa (SEIA).
Porter, L.W., Steers, R. M., Mowday, R. T. & Boulian, P. V. (1974). Organizational commitment, job satisfaction and turnover among psychiatric technicians. Journal of Applied Psychology, 59(5), 603-609.
Ramberg, J., & Modin, B. (2019). School effectiveness and student cheating: Do students’ grades and moral standards matter for this relationship?. Social Psychology of Education, 22(3), 517-538.
Reichers, A. E. (1985). A review and reconceptualization of organizational commitment. Academy of Management Review, 10, 465-476
Reyes, P. (1990). Teachers and their workplace: Commitment, performance, and productivity. Sage Publications.
Robinson, V. M. J. (2008). Forging the links between distributed leadership and
educational outcomes. Journal of Educational Administration, 46(2), 241-256.
Rosenholtz, S. (1985). Effective schools: Interpreting the evidence. American Journal of Education, 93, 352-387.
Spillane, J. P. (2005). Distributed leadership. The Educational Forum, 69(2), 143–150. https://doi-org.proxyone.lib.nccu.edu.tw:8443/10.1080/00131720508984678
Spillane, J. P., Halverson, R., & Diamond, J. B. (2001). Investigating school leadership practice: A distributed perspective. Educational Researcher, 30(3), 23-28. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X030003023
Stevens, J. M., Beyer, J. M., & Trice, H. M. (1978). Assessing personal, role, and organizational predictor of managerial commitment. Academy of Management Journal, 21, 380-396.
Stoll, L., & Fink, D. (1996). Changing our schools. Open University Press.
Teddlie, C., & Stringfield, S. (2007). A history of school effectiveness and improvement research in the USA focusing on the past quarter century. In T. Townsend (Ed.), International Handbook of School Effectiveness and Improvement. Dordrecht, Netherlands, Springer.
Tian, M., Risku, M., & Collin, K. (2016). A meta-analysis of distributed leadership from 2002 to 2013: Theory development, empirical evidence and future research focus. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 44(1), 146–164. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143214558576
Wang, A. H., Walters, A. M., & Thum, Y. M. (2013). Identifying highly effective urban schools: Comparing two measures of school success. International Journal of Educational Management, 27(5), 517-540.
Whyte, W. H. (1956). The organization man. University of Pennsylvania Press.
Wiener, Y. (1982). Commitment in organisations: A normative view. The Academy of Management Review, 7(3), 418-428.
Wright, L. L. (2008). Merits and limitations of distributed leadership: Experiences and understandings of school principals. Canadian Journal of Educational Administration and Policy, 69, 1-33. |
| Description: | 碩士
國立政治大學
教育行政與政策研究所
110171009 |
| Source URI: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0110171009 |
| Data Type: | thesis |
| Appears in Collections: | [教育行政與政策研究所 ] 學位論文
|
Files in This Item:
| File |
Description |
Size | Format | |
|---|
| 100901.pdf | | 7736Kb | Adobe PDF | 0 | View/Open |
|
All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.
|
