Loading...
|
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/152967
|
| Title: | 情緒詞類、人稱指涉、及個人社會認知能力對語句處理的影響
The Influence of Emotional Word Type, Personal Reference, and Individual Social Cognitive Ability on Sentence Processing |
| Authors: | 許涴筑
Hsu, Wan-Chu |
| Contributors: | 賴瑶鍈
Lai, Yao-Ying
許涴筑
Hsu, Wan-Chu |
| Keywords: | 語句處理
情緒詞類
人稱指涉
社會認知能力
語言即時理解
Sentence processing
Emotional word type
Personal reference
Social cognitive ability
Real-time language comprehension |
| Date: | 2024 |
| Issue Date: | 2024-08-06 14:00:33 (UTC+8) |
| Abstract: | 本研究旨在探討語句的處理是否會因不同的情緒詞類、人稱指涉、及社會認知能力的個體差異而產生影響。過去有諸多探討情緒語言的心理與神經語言學實驗，但大多是在單詞層級。本研究針對句子層級，檢視語言理解者如何處理文句語境中的情緒詞。情緒詞彙可分二類：情緒標籤詞 (emotion-label words)，詞彙語意直接指涉特定情緒，像是「快樂的」、「悲傷的」；情緒負載詞 (emotion-laden words) ，在詞語字面意義之上隱含情緒意涵，像是「光明的」、「灰暗的」。而情緒與他人或自身相關，在語言中透過與之搭配的人稱指涉詞來表述 (self- vs.
other-relevant)；以不同人稱觀點來表述是否會影響情緒語言的處理仍未知。此外，過去文獻指出社會認知能力會影響個人情緒訊息的接收及語句內容的處理，故此研究也檢視此個體差異因素如何左右情緒語言的處理歷程。
本研究包含兩項前測實驗及一項主要實驗。前測一為線上問卷，請臺灣華語母語者將形容詞歸類至情緒標籤或情緒負載詞，用來建構主實驗的刺激材料句。前測二為自然通順程度的評分問卷，確保各條件語句對母語者來說皆自然通順且無顯著差異。主實驗為自訂步調閱讀任務，以閱讀時長 (reading times, RTs) 推測理解歷程、並以自閉症量表指數衡量個人社會認知能力。實驗結果顯示，情緒詞類及社會認知能力的個體差異對句子的即時處理皆產生顯著影響。語句中情緒標籤詞的閱讀時間長於情緒負載詞，可能是由於閱讀文句語境中的情緒標籤詞時，理解者除了建構整體句意表徵，還須處理額外的情緒意涵，因此引起較長的閱讀時間；反之，人們在文句語境中可能較容易忽略情緒負載詞隱含的情緒意涵，僅處理字面層次的意義。此外，社會認知能力較低者閱讀語句時的時間較長（與社會認知能力較高者相比），顯示了情緒語句處理上的困難；推測與整合語句內容（包含情緒詞及人稱指涉）的速度較慢、及忖度他人/自身心理狀態的能力較弱有關。或者，也可能是由於社會認知能力較低者閱讀態度較為謹慎造成。另一方面，人稱指涉的效果在實驗檢視的關鍵情緒詞區未達顯著，顯示了此因素對情緒語句的處理歷程沒有影響。
本研究將情緒詞帶入語句中，觀察在不同人稱指涉下、不同社會認知能力者的閱讀理解歷程，補充了在語句層次處理情緒語言的實驗結果，同時揭示社會認知個體差異的影響，予現有之理論提供實證回饋。未來研究或許可進一步探討情緒語言與人稱指涉的交互作用，以及多方探討語句中情緒訊息的處理。
The present study aims to investigate the real-time comprehension of emotional sentences, by manipulating emotional Word Type, Personal Reference, and social
cognitive ability (SCA). While previous experimental studies have demonstrated an effect of emotional word type on processing at the lexical level, the current study targets
the processing of emotional word type at the sentential level. Emotional words can be categorized into two types: emotion-label words that refer to emotional states (e.g.,
happy, sad), and emotion-laden words that imply certain emotion alongside their semantic denotation (e.g., bright, dark). Meanwhile, emotional words typically predicate individuals, related to others or ourselves. It remains unclear if taking different perspectives to comprehend emotional word types would factor into processing. Additionally, previous work has suggested that individual SCA affects the perception of emotional words and sentence processing. I therefore examine if the processing of emotional sentences modulated by emotional word types would vary with this individual difference.
The present thesis comprises two norming studies and the main self-paced reading experiment. Norming Study 1 was an online questionnaire that asked native speakers of Taiwanese Mandarin to categorize adjectives into different Word Types. The categorized words were then used to construct experimental sentences. Norming Study 2 assessed the naturalness of experimental sentences in an online questionnaire to ensure the feasible stimuli. The ensuing main experiment adopted a self-paced reading task with a moving-window paradigm to measure reading times (RTs) to probe realtime processing; the participants took the Autism-Spectrum Quotient (AQ) as a measurement of individual SCA. Results showed a significant effect of emotional Word
Type, such that sentences with emotion-laden words had shorter RTs than the counterparts with emotion-label words. I posited that in comprehending sentences containing emotion-label words, participants were tasked not only with constructing semantic representations but also with integrating emotional properties into the sentences. On the contrary, in sentences containing emotion-laden words, people may overlook the underlying emotional properties and focus solely on processing the literal meanings. Additionally, the effect of individual SCA was also significant, indicating longer RTs for those with lower SCA. This phenomenon is potentially influenced by Personal Reference and emotional Word Type. More crucially, the weaker ability to integrate sentence contents and empathize with or reflect on others’ and one’s own mind states may also contribute to this effect. Alternatively, it could be because people with lower SCA are more careful readers. However, the main effect of Personal Reference did not reach significance in the target emotion-word region examined in the experiment, indicating that Personal Reference does not influence the processing of emotional sentences.
This research integrates emotional words into sentences to observe the processes of reading comprehension from different perspectives and with different levels of SCA,
advancing our understanding of emotion language processing. Future study could further clarify the interaction between emotional expressions and personal reference, delving deeper into the processing of sentences containing emotional information. |
| Reference: | Ashwin, C., & Brosnan, M. (2019). The dual process theory of autism. Thinking, Reasoning, and Decision Making in Autism, p. 13-38. Routledge.
Au-Yeung, S., Kaakinen, J. K., Liversedge, S. P., & Benson, V. (2015). Processing of written irony in autism spectrum disorder: an eye-movement study. Autism Research, 8, 749-760. http://doi.org/10.1002/aur.1490
Baron-Cohen, S. (2000). Theory of mind and autism: A review. International Review of Research in Mental Retardation, 23, 169-184. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0074-7750(00)80010-5
Baron-Cohen, S. (2001). Theory of mind in normal development and autism. Prisme, 34(1), 74-183.
Baron-Cohen, S., Wheelwright, S., Skinner, R., Martin, J., & Clubley, E. (2001). The autism-spectrum quotient (AQ): evidence from Asperger syndrome/high-functioning autism, males and females, scientists and mathematicians. Journal of
Autism and Developmental Disorders, 31(1), 5-17.
https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005653411471
Barzy, M., Filik, R., Williams, D., & Ferguson, H. J. (2020). Emotional processing of ironic versus literal criticism in autistic and nonautistic adults: evidence from eye-tracking. Autism Research, 13, 563-578. http://doi.org/10.1002/aur.2272
Bates, D., Maechler, M., Bolker, B., &Walker, S. (2015). Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1), 1-48.
https://doi:10.18637/jss.v067.i01.
Baumeister, R. F., Bratslavsky, E., Finkenauer, C., & Vohs, K. D. (2001). Bad is stronger than good. Review of General Psychology, 5(4), 323-370.
https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.5.4.323
Berlingeri, M., Crepaldi, D., Roberti, R., Scialfa, G., Luzzatti, C., & Paulesu, E. (2008). Nouns and verbs in the brain: Grammatical class and task specific effects as
revealed by fMRI. Cognitive neuropsychology, 25(4), 528-558.
https://doi.org/10.1080/02643290701674943
Bouranta, N., Chitiris, L., & Paravantis, J. (2009). The relationship between internal and external service quality. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality
Management, 21(3), 275-293. https://doi.org/10.1108/09596110910948297
Bromberek-Dyzman, K., Vasileanu, M., & BąK, H. (2021). Cross-linguistic differences affect emotion and emotion-laden word processing: Evidence from Polish-English
and Romanian-English bilinguals. International Journal of Bilingualism, 25(5),
1161-1182. http://doi.org/10.1177/1367006920987306
Brosnan, M., & Ashwin, C. (2023). Thinking, fast and slow on the autism spectrum. Autism, 27(5), 1245-1255. https://doi.org/10.1177/13623613221132437
Brosnan, M., Lewton, M., & Ashwin, C. (2016). Reasoning on the autism spectrum: A dual process theory account. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 46, 2115-2125. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-016-2742-4
Brunyé, T. T., Ditman, T., Mahoney, C. R., Augustyn, J. S., & Taylor, H. A. (2009). When you and I share perspective: pronouns modulate perspective taking during narrative comprehension. Association for Psychological Science,
20(1). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02249.x
Cai, Q., & Brysbaert, M. (2010). SUBTLEX-CH: Chinese word and character frequencies based on film subtitles. PloS one, 5(6), e10729.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0010729
Carretié, L., Mercado, F., Tapia, M., & Hinojosa, J. A. (2001). Emotion, attention, and the ‘negativity bias’, studied through event-related potentials. International
Journal of Psychophysiology, 41 (1), 75-85.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-8760(00)00195-1
Chen, Y., Zhong, Y. P., Zhou, H. B., Zhang, S. M., Tan, Q. B., & Fan, W. (2014). Evidence for implicit self‑positivity bias: an event‑related brain potential study.
Experimental Brain Research, 232. 985-994.
http://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-013-3810-z
Child, S., Garnham, A., & Oakhill, J. (2019). Remember they were emotional - Effects of emotional qualifiers during sentence processing. Open Psychology, 1(1), 119-
131. https://doi.org/10.1515/psych-2018-0009
Cho, S. L., Chen, H. C., & Cheng, C. M. (2013). Taiwan corpora of Chinese emotions and relevant psychophysiological data-a study on the norm of Chinese emotional words. Chinese Journal of Psychology, 55(4), 493-523.
https://doi.org/10.3758/s13415-020-00774-9
Chou, L. C., Pan, Y. L., & Lee, C. L. (2020). Emotion anticipation induces emotion effects in neutral words during sentence reading: Evidence from event-related potentials. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 20, 1294-1308.https://doi.org/10.3758/s13415-020-00835-z
Courchesne, E., Yeung-Courchesne, R., Press, G. A., Hesselink, J. R., & Jernigan, T. L. (2013). Hypoplasia of cerebellar vermal lobules VI and VII in autism. Autism (pp.
197-202). Routledge.
Davis, M. & Whalen, P. J. (2001). The amygdala: vigilance and emotion. Molecular Psychiatry, 6, 13-34. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.mp.4000812
de Villiers, J. (2007). The interface of language and theory of mind. Lingua, 117(11), 1858-1878. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2006.11.006
Desai, R., Conant, L. L., Waldron, E., & Binder, J. R. (2006). FMRI of past tense processing: the effects of phonological complexity and task difficulty. Journal of
Cognitive Neuroscience, 18(2), 278-297.
https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2006.18.2.278
Fields, E. C. & Kuperberg, G. R. (2012). It’s all about you: an ERP study of emotion and self-relevance in discourse. NeuroImage, 62(1), 562-574.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.05.003
Gaigg, S. B., & Bowler, D. M. (2008). Free recall and forgetting of emotionally arousing words in autism spectrum disorder. Neuropsychologia, 46(9), 2336-2343.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2008.03.008
Gaigg, S. B. & Bowler, D. M. (2009). Brief report: attenuated emotional suppression of the attentional blink in autism spectrum disorder: another non-social abnormality?
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders. 39, 1211-1217.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-009-0719-2
Hampson, D. R., & Blatt, G. J. (2015). Autism spectrum disorders and neuropathology of the cerebellum. Frontiers in neuroscience, 9, 420.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2015.00420
Happé, F. (2003). Theory of mind and the self. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1001(1), 134-144. https://doi.org/10.1196/annals.1279.008
Hardie, A (2012) CQPweb - combining power, flexibility and usability in a corpus analysis tool. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 17 (3), 380–409.
https://doi.org/10.2478/icame-2014-0004
Herbert, C., Herbert, B. M., Ethofer, T., & Pauli, P. (2011a). His or mine? The time course of self-other discrimination in emotion processing. Social Neuroscience.
6(3), 277-288. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470919.2010.523543
Herbert, C., Junghofer, M., & Kissler, J. (2008). Event related potentials to emotional adjectives during reading. Psychophysiology, 45(3), 487-498.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8986.2007.00638.x
Herbert, C., Pauli, P., & Herbert, B. M. (2011b). Self-reference modulates the processing of emotional stimuli in the absence of explicit self-referential appraisal
instructions. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 6(5), 653-661.https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsq082
Hinojosa, J. A., Moreno, E. M., & Ferré P. (2020). Affective neurolinguistics: towards a framework for reconciling language and emotion. Language, Cognition and
Neuroscience, 35(7), 813-839. http://doi.org/10.1080/23273798.2019.1620957
Ho, S. M., Mak, C. W., Yeung, D., Duan, W., Tang, S., Yeung, J. C., & Ching, R. (2015). Emotional valence, arousal, and threat ratings of 160 Chinese words among adolescents. PloS one, 10(7), e0132294.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0132294
Hsu, S. H., & Huang, K. C. (2001). Effects of minimal legible size characters on Chinese word recognition. Visible language, 35(2).
Icht, M., Zukerman, G., Ben‐Itzchak, E., & Ben‐David, B. M. (2021). Keep it simple: Identification of basic versus complex emotions in spoken language in individuals
with autism spectrum disorder without intellectual disability: A meta‐analysis study. Autism Research, 14(9), 1948-1964. https://doi.org/10.1002/aur.2551
Jay, T., Caldwell-Harris, C., & King, K. (2008). Recalling taboo and nontaboo words. The American journal of psychology, 121(1), 83-103.https://doi.org/10.2307/20445445
Jiang, Z. Q., Li, W. H., Liu, Y., Luo, Y. J., Luu, P., & Tucker, D. M. (2014). When affective word valence meets linguistic polarity: Behavioral and ERP evidence.
Journal of Neurolinguistics, 28, 19-30.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneuroling.2013.11.001
Just, M. A., Carpenter, P. A., & Woolley, J. D. (1982). Paradigms and processes in reading comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 111(2), 228-238. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.111.2.228
Kana, R. K., Patriquin, M. A., Black, B. S., Channell, M. M., & Wicker, B. (2016). Altered medial frontal and superior temporal response to implicit processing of emotions in autism. Autism Research, 9, 55-56. https://doi.org/10.1002/aur.1496
Kana, R. K., Sartin, E. B., Stevens Jr., C., Deshpande, H. D., Klein, C., Klinger, M. R., & Klinger, L. G. (2017). Neural networks underlying language and social
cognition during self-other processing in autism spectrum disorders. Neuropsychologia. 102, 116-123.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2017.06.008
Kazanas, S. A. & Altarriba, J. (2015). The automatic activation of emotion and emotion-laden words: evidence from a masked and unmasked priming paradigm. The American Journal of Psychology. 128 (3), 323-336.
https://doi.org/10.5406/amerjpsyc.128.3.0323
Kazanas, S. A. & Altarriba, J. (2016). Emotion word processing: effects of word type and valence in Spanish-English bilinguals. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research.
45, 395-406. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-015-9357-3
Kensinger, E. A., & Corkin, S. (2003). Memory enhancement for emotional words: Are emotional words more vividly remembered than neutral words? Memory &
cognition, 31(8), 1169-1180. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03195800
Knickerbocker, F., Johnson, R. L., Starr, E. L., Hall, A. M., Preti, D. M., Slate, S. R., & Altarriba, J. (2019). The time course of processing emotion-laden words during
sentence reading: evidence from eye movements. Acta Psychologica. 192, 1-10.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2018.10.008
Kutas, M., & Federmeier, K. D. (2011). Thirty years and counting: finding meaning in the N400 component of the event-related brain potential (ERP). Annual Review of
Psychology, 62, 621-647. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.093008.131123
Kutas, M., & Hillyard, S. A. (1980). Reading senseless sentences: Brain potentials reflect semantic incongruity. Science, 207(4427), 203-205.
http://doi.org/10.1126/science.7350657
Lai, V. T., Willems, R. M., & Hagoort, P. (2015). Feel between the lines: implied emotion in sentence comprehension. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. 27 (8).
https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn_a_00798
Lai, Y. Y., & Lai, H. L. (2023). Impact of social cognitive propensity on the processing of nontransparent sentential meaning. Journal of Pragmatics. 205, 33-62.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2022.12.014
Lai, Y. Y., Sakai, H., & Makuuchi, M. (2023). Neural underpinnings of processing combinatorial unstated meaning and the influence of individual cognitive style. Cerebral Cortex, 33(18), 10013-10027.
https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhad261
Larsen, R. J., Mercer, K. A., Balota, D. A., & Strube, M. J. (2008). Not all negative words slow down lexical decision and naming speed: importance of word arousal.Emotion. 8 (4), 445-452. https://doi.org/10.1037/1528-3542.8.4.445
Lartseva, A., Dijkstra, T., & Buitelaar, J. K. (2015). Emotional language processing in autism spectrum disorders: a systematic review. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, 991. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00991
Lau, E. F., Phillips, C., & Poeppel, D. (2008). A cortical network for semantics:(de) constructing the N400. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 9(12), 920-933.
http://doi.org/10.1038/nrn2532
Lau, Y. P., Gau, S. F., Chiu, Y. N., Wu, Y. Y., Chou, W. J., Liu, S. K., & Chou, M. C. (2013). Psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the Autism Spectrum Quotient (AQ). Research in Developmental Disabilities. 34(1), 294-305.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2012.08.005
Lee S. Y. M. (2015). A linguistic analysis of implicit emotions. In Lu, Q. & Gao, H. H. (Eds.), Chinese Lexical Semantics (pp. 185–194). Springer International Publishing, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-27194-1_19
Lee, Y. U., Yang, M. J., Lai, T. J., Chiu, N. M., & Chau, T. T. (2000). Development of the Taiwanese depression questionnaire. Chang Gung Medical Journal, 23, 688-
694.
Lenth, R. (2024). emmeans: Estimated Marginal Means, aka Least-Squares Means. R package version 1.10.0. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=emmeans.
Lewton, M., Ashwin, C., & Brosnan, M. (2019). Syllogistic reasoning reveals reduced bias in people with higher autistic-like traits from the general population. Autism,
23 (5), 1311e1321. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362361318808779
Liu, J., Fan, L., Tian, L., Li, C., & Feng, W. (2022). The neural mechanisms of Explicit and implicit processing of Chinese emotion-label and emotion-laden words: evidence from emotional categorisation and emotional Stroop tasks. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 1-18.
https://doi.org/10.1080/23273798.2022.2093389
Lombardo, M. V., Barnes, J. L., Wheelwright, S. J., & Baron-Cohen, S. (2007). Self referential cognition and empathy in autism. PLoS ONE, 2, e883.
http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0000883
Lüdtke, J., & Jacobs, A. M. (2015). The emotion potential of simple sentences: additive or interactive effects of nouns and adjectives? Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1137.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01137
Lundström, S., Chang, Z., Råstam, M., Gillberg, C., Larsson, H., Anckarsäter, H., & Lichtenstein, P. (2012). Autism spectrum disorders and autistic like traits: similar
etiology in the extreme end and the normal variation. Archives of General Psychiatry, 69(1), 46-52. http://doi.org/10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2011.144
Miri Ashtiani, S. N., & Daliri, M. R. (2023). Identification of cognitive load-dependent activation patterns using working memory task-based fMRI at various levels of
difficulty. Scientific Reports, 13(1), 16476.
http://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-43837-w
Mizuno, A., Liu, Y., Williams, D. L., Keller, T. A., Minshew, N. J., & Just, M. A. (2011). The neural basis of deictic shifting in linguistic perspective-taking in high functioning autism. Brain, 134(8), 2422-2435.
https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awr151
Nieuwland, M. S., Ditman, T., & Kuperberg, G. R. (2010). On the incrementality of pragmatic processing: An ERP investigation of informativeness and pragmatic abilities. Journal of Memory and Language, 63(3), 324-346.
Pavlenko, A. (2008). Emotion and emotion-laden words in the bilingual lexicon. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 11(2), 147–164.https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728908003283
Pessoa, L. (2023). The entangled brain. Journal of cognitive neuroscience, 35(3), 349-360. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn_a_01908
Pratto, F., & John, O. (1991). Automatic vigilance: The attention-grabbing power of negative social information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,61, 380–391. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.61.3.380
Preston, C. C., & Colman, A. M. (2000). Optimal number of response categories in rating scales: reliability, validity, discriminating power, and respondent preferences. Acta psychologica, 104(1), 1-15.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0001-6918(99)00050-5
R Core Team (2023). R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria.
https://www.R-project.org/.
Rosling, H., Rosling, O., & Rönnlund, A. R. (2018). Factfulness: Ten Reasons We’re Wrong about the World--And Why Things Are Better Than You Think. Flatiron Books.
Rozin, P., Berman, L., & Royzman, E. (2010). Biases in use of positive and negative words across twenty natural languages. Cognition and Emotion, 24(3), 536-548.
https://doi.org/10.1080/02699930902793462
Russell, J. A. (1980). A circumplex model of affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39(6), 1161-1178. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0077714
Ruzich, E., Allison, C., Smith, P., Watson, P., Auyeung, B., Ring, H., & Baron-Cohen, S. (2015). Measuring autistic traits in the general population: a systematic review
of the Autism-Spectrum Quotient (AQ) in a nonclinical population sample of 6,900 typical adult males and females. Molecular Autism, 6, 1-12.
http://doi.org/10.1186/2040-2392-6-2
Schacht, A., & Sommer, W. (2009). Time course and task dependence of emotion effects in word processing. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 9(1), 28-43. https://doi.org/10.3758/CABN.9.1.28
Schmahmann, J. D., & Sherman, J. C. (1998). The cerebellar cognitive affective syndrome. Brain: a journal of neurology, 121(4), 561-579.https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/121.4.561
Schütze, C. T., & Sprouse, J. (2013). Judgment data. Research Methods in Linguistics, 27-50.
Scott, G. G., O'Donnell, P. J., & Sereno, S. C. (2012). Emotion words affect eye fixations during reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 38(3), 783. http://doi.org/10.1037/a0027209
Shi, H., Li, Y., & Sui, X. (2022). Effects of emotional word types: behavioral and neural evidence for discrimination between emotion-label and emotion-laden words. Advances in Psychological Science, 30(12), 2696-2707.
https://doi.org/10.3724/SP.J.1042.2022.02696
Siciliano L., & Clausi, S. (2020). Implicit vs. explicit emotion processing in autism spectrum disorders: an opinion on the role of the cerebellum. Frontiers in Psychology, 11 (96). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00096
Singmann, H., Bolker, B., Westfall, J., Aust, F., & Ben-Shachar, M. (2023). afex: Analysis of Factorial Experiments. R package version 1.3-0.
https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=afex.
Skowronski, J. J. & Carlston, D. E. (1989). Negativity and extremity biases in impression formation: a review of explanations. Psychological Bulletin, 105 (1),131-142. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.105.1.131
Soares, A. P., Macedo, J., Oliveira, H. M., Lages, A., Hernández-Cabrera, J., & Pinheiro,A. P. (2019). Self-reference is a fast-acting automatic mechanism on emotional
word processing: evidence from a masked priming affective categorisation task.Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 31(3), 317-325.https://doi.org/10.1080/20445911.2019.1599003
Song, D., Wen, H., & Dong, Y. (2023). Affective Norms for Chinese Words of Typical Life Scenes Rated by Older Adults (ANCO). Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 52(4), 1115-1140. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-023-09948-1
Štajner, S., Yaneva, V., Mitkov, R., & Ponzetto, S. P. (2017). Effects of lexical properties on viewing time per word in autistic and neurotypical readers. Proceedings of the 12th Workshop on Innovative Use of NLP for Building Educational Applications, 271-281. https://aclanthology.org/W17-5030
Sylvester, T., Liebig, J., & Jacobs, A. M. (2021). Neural correlates of affective contributions to lexical decisions in children and adults. Scientific Reports. 11(945). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-80359-1
Tager‐Flusberg, H., Paul, R., & Lord, C. (2005). Language and communication in autism. Handbook of Autism and Pervasive Developmental Disorders, 1, 335-364.
http://doi.org/10.1002/9780470939345
Taylor, S. E. (1991). Asymmetrical effects of positive and negative events: The mobilization-minimization hypothesis. Psychological Bulletin. 110, 67– 85.
https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.110.1.67
Unkelbach, C., Fiedler, K., Bayer, M., Stegmüller, M., & Danner, D. (2008). Why positive information is processed faster: the density hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 95 (1), 36-49.
https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.95.1.36
van Berkum, J. J. (2020). Inclusive affective neurolinguistics. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 35(7), 871-876. https://doi.org/10.1080/23273798.2019.1665191
Wang, X., Shangguan, C., & Lu, J. (2019). Time course of emotion effects during emotion-label and emotion-laden word processing. Neuroscience Letters, 699, 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neulet.2019.01.028
Was, C. A., & Hamrick, P. (2021). What did they mean by that? Young adults' interpretations of 105 common emojis. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 655297.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.655297
Watson, L. A., Dritschel, B., Jentzsch, I., & Obonsawin, M. C. (2008). Changes in the relationship between self‐reference and emotional valence as a function of dysphoria. British Journal of Psychology, 99(1), 143-152.
https://doi.org/10.1348/000712607X248689
Wickham, H., François, R., Henry, L., Müller, K., & Vaughan, D. (2023). dplyr: A Grammar of Data Manipulation. R package version 1.1.4. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=dplyr
Xu, X., Li, J., & Chen, H. (2022). Valence and arousal ratings for 11,310 simplified Chinese words. Behavior Research Methods, 54(1), 26-41.
http://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-021-01607-4
Yao, Z., Wu, J., Zhang, Y., & Wang, Z. (2017). Norms of valence, arousal, concreteness, familiarity, imageability, and context availability for 1,100 Chinese words. Behavior Research Method, 49(4), 1374-1385.
https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-016-0793-2
Yee, L. T. (2017). Valence, arousal, familiarity, concreteness, and imageability ratings for 292 two-character Chinese nouns in Cantonese speakers in Hong Kong. PloS one, 12(3), e0174569. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0174569
Yu, B. & Cao, H. (1992). A new exploration on the effect of stroke-number in the identification of Chinese characters. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2, 120-126.
Yu, L. C., Lee, L. H., Hao, S., Wang, J., He, Y., Hu, J., Lai, K. R., & Zhang, X. (2016). Building Chinese affective resources in valence-arousal dimensions. Proceedings of NAACL-HLT 2016, 540-545.
https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/N16-1066
Zhang, M., Piñango, M. M., & Deo, A. (2022). Word-meaning variation in English have-sentences: the impact of cognitive versus social factors on individuals' linguistic context-sensitivity. Language, 98(1), 123-156.
https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2021.0088
Zhang, J., Wu, C., Meng, Y., & Meng, Y. (2017). Different neural correlates of emotion label words and emotion-laden words: an ERP study. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2017.00455
Zhang, J., Wu, C., Yuan, Z., & Meng, Y. (2019). Differentiating emotion-label words and emotion-laden words in emotion conflict: an ERP study. Experimental Brain
Research, 237, 2423-2430.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-019-05600-4
Zhu, L., Wang, C. X., He, J. C., Chen, X. J., Guo, Y. X., & Lu, F. (2008). The effect of font, stroke and contrast on the reading speed of Chinese characters. Chinese Journal of Optometry Ophthalmology and Visual Science, 10(2), 96-99. |
| Description: | 碩士
國立政治大學
語言學研究所
110555006 |
| Source URI: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0110555006 |
| Data Type: | thesis |
| Appears in Collections: | [語言學研究所] 學位論文
|
Files in This Item:
| File |
Description |
Size | Format | |
|---|
| 500601.pdf | | 2392Kb | Adobe PDF | 0 | View/Open |
|
All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.
|
