English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 110751/141676 (78%)
Visitors : 47379235      Online Users : 392
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/33373


    Title: 以語料庫觀點來看漢語手指謠之節律
    The Rhythm of Mandarin Finger Rhymes: A Corpus-based Study
    Authors: 黃婷
    Huang,Ting
    Contributors: 蕭宇超
    Hsiao,Yuchau E.
    黃婷
    Huang,Ting
    Keywords: 手指謠
    語料庫
    節律
    重音
    手指動作
    Finger Rhymes
    Corpus
    Rhythm
    Stress
    Finger Movements
    Date: 2006
    Issue Date: 2009-09-17 16:24:56 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 本文旨從語料庫觀點來探討漢語手指謠之節奏、重音及手指動作之韻律結構。本研究建立了四千一百七十二行的語料庫,並詳細標記句法、虛詞、重音、音節和音拍等。本文發現手指謠節奏以陽性節奏 (Masculine Rhythm) 居多,音拍共享 (Beat-sharing) 常發生在虛詞 (F Categories) 和直接成分 (Immediate Constituents),以符合陽性節奏的原則;透過詩行模組 (Metrical Template) 可衍生出不同的節律類型。另一方面,本研究認為重音在漢語中確實有存在之必要,藉由重音極大值 (Stress Maximum) 的落點,可解釋語料庫中不符詩感 (Metricality) 的謠行。本文最後將重心轉向手指謠的物理動作節律,手指動作因配合兒童年齡之認知及肢體發展,概分為0-2歲、2-4歲及4-6歲三大階段,越小的兒童吟誦手指謠之速度較慢,手指動作也相對簡單細微。本文發現手指動作範疇乃藉由語調片語 (Intonational Phrase) 來進行切割,語調片語須與「意義單位」 (Sense Unit) 彼此對整。本文亦從「優選理論」(Optimality Theory) 的角度來探討此三大研究議題,分別從「節律語法」和「流動制約」(Floating Constraints) 的觀念,藉由制約層級的重新排序來體現漢語手指謠的節律變化。
    This thesis takes great efforts in the topics about rhythm, stress and prosodic structures of the finger movements in Mandarin finger rhymes. This research established a corpus with a total of 4172 lines, each of which is coded with word categories, syntax tree, simplified tree, the number of syllables, the number of demibeats, and the stress. First of all, the masculine rhythm is the most common in the corpus. The beat-sharing, the strategy to obtain the masculine rhythm, is largely found in the F categories and the immediate constituents. The metrical template is also needed to yield the different rhythm types. Second, stress plays an important role in Maindarin Chinese. The judgement of the metricality strictly follows the metrical positions on which a stress maximum falls. The emphasis is finally put to the finger movements. The finger movements are respectively designed for the children who are 0-2, 2-4 and 4-6 years old, with the different developments in the cognition and physiology. When young children recite a metrical line, the speech rate is not as fast as other elder children and the finger movements are simple and subtle. The prosodic domains of the movements are defined from the perspective of IPs, and each IP is a sense unit (Selkirk 1984). Optimality Theory (Prince and Smolensky 1993, 2004) further covers these three research issues. The rhythm variations are vivid with the constraint re-rankings in terms of the metrics grammar and the floating constraints.
    Reference: Anttila, A. (1995). Deriving variation from grammar: a study of Finnish genitives.
    Anttila, A. (2000). Derived environment effects in Colloquial Helsinki Finnish.
    Anttila, A. (2001). Variation and phonological theory. In J. K. Chambers, P. Trudgil and N. Schilling-Estes (eds.), The Handbook of Language Variation and Change 206-243. Blackwell Publisher.
    Anttila, A. and Cho, Y. M. (1998). Variation and change in Optimality Theory. Lingua 104, 31-56.
    Biber, Douglas, Conrad, Susan and Randi, Reppen (1998). Corpus Linguistics: Investigating Langauge Structure and Use. Cambridge, UK: The Press Syndicate of the University of Cambridge.
    Bierwisch, M. (1966). Strukturalismus: Geschichte, Probleme, Methoden. Kursbuch 5, 77-152.
    Bing, J. (1979). Aspects of English Prosody. University of Massachusetts at Amherst.
    Boersma, P. (1998). Functional Phonology. University of Amsterdam.
    Boersma, P. and Hayes, Bruce (1999). Empirical tests of the Gradual Learning Algorithm.
    Boersma, P. and Hayes, Bruce (2001). Empirical tests of the Gradual Learning Algorithm. Linguistic Inquiry.
    Bolinger, D. (1962). Binominals and pitch accent. Lingua 11, 34-44.
    Boxwell, H. and Boxwell, M. (1966). Weri phonemes. In S. Wurm (ed.), New Guinea Linguistics 77-93. Canberra: Australian National University.
    Boyce, C. (1980). Min Sandhi in Verse Recitation. Journal of Chinese Linguistics 8, 1-12.
    Buring, R. (1966). The metrics of children`s verse: a cross-linguistic study. American Anthropologist 68, 1418-1441.
    Chen, M. (1979). Metrical Structure: Evidence from Chinese Poetry. Linguistic Inquiry 10, 371-420.
    Chen, M. (1980). The primacy of rhythm in verse: a linguistic perspective Journal of Chinese Linguistics 8, 15-41.

    Chen, M. (1984). Unfolding latent principles of literary taste: Poetry as a window onto language Tsinghua Journal of Chinese Studies 16, 203-240.
    Chen, M. (1991). From tone to intonation: A case study on Wenzhou. University of California, San Diego.
    Cheng, C.-C. (1970). Domains of Phonological Rule Application. POLA Reports 10, 1-21.
    Chomsky, Noam and Halle, Morris (1968). The sound pattern of English. New York Harper & Row.
    Chomsky, Noam, Halle, Morris and Lukoff, Fred (eds.) (1956). On accent and juncture in English. The Hague: Mouton.
    Cooper, W. E. and Sorensen, J. M. (1981). Fundamental frequency in sentence production. New York: Springer-Verlag.
    Ding, Hui-Yu (1997a). Baobei Shouzhiyao 1 [Baby Finger Plays 1]. Taipei: 3&3 International Education Institute.
    Ding, Hui-Yu (1997b). Baobei Shouzhiyao 2 [Baby Finger Plays 2]. Taipei: 3&3 International Education Institute.
    Ding, Hui-Yu (1997c). Baobei Shouzhiyao 3 [Baby Finger Plays 3]. Taipei: 3&3 International Education Institute.
    Downing, B. (1970). Syntactic Structure and Phonological Phrasing in English. University of Texas at Austin.
    Downing, J. (1973). Parenthesization Rules and Obligatory Phrasing. Papers in Linguistics 6, 108-128.
    Duanmu, San (1999). Stress and the development of disyllabic words in Chinese. Diachronica 16, 1-35.
    Duanmu, San (2004). A corpus study of Chinese regulated verse: phrasal stress and the analysis of variability Phonology 21, 43-89.
    Echeveria, Max and Contreras, Heles (1965). Araucanian phonemics. International Journal of American Linguistics 31, 132-135.
    Golston, Chris (1998). Constraint-based metrics. NLLT 16, 719-770.
    Halle, M. (1970). On Meter and Prosody. In M. Bierwisch and K. E. Heidolph (eds.), Progress in Linguistics Mouton: The Hague.
    Halle, Morris and Keyser, Samuel Jay (1969). Chaucer and the Study of Prosody College English 28, 187-219.
    Halle, Morris and Keyser, Samuel Jay (1971). English Stress: its form, its growth, and its role in verse. New York: Harper & Row.
    Halle, Morris and Vergnaud, Jean-Roger (1987). An essay on stress. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
    Halliday, M. A. K. (1967). Intonation and grammar in British English. The Hague: Mouton
    Hammond, Michael (1984). Constraining metrical theory: A modular theory of rhythm and destressing. Los Angeles: University of California.
    Hanson, Kristin and Kiparsky, Paul (1996). A parametric theory of poetic meter. Language 72, 287-335.
    Hayes, Bruce (1981). A metrical theory of stress rules. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT.
    Hayes, Bruce (1983). A Grid-Based Theory of English Meter. Linguistic Inquiry 14, 357-393.
    Hayes, Bruce (1984). The phonology of rhythm in English. Linguistic Inquiry 15, 33-74.
    Hayes, Bruce (1989a). Compensatory Lengthening in Moraic Phonology. Linguistic Inquiry 20, 253-306.
    Hayes, Bruce (1989b). The Prosodic Hierarchy in Meter. In Paul Kiparsky and Youmans Gilbert (eds.), Phonetics and Phonology 201-260. San Diego, California: Academic Press.
    Hayes, Bruce (2000). Faithfulness and componentiality in metrics.
    Hockett, Charles F (1958). Two models of grammatical description.
    Hsiao, Yuchau E. (1990). When syntax meets rhythm. Proceedings of the 20th Western Conference on Linguistics 127-137.
    Hsiao, Yuchau E. (1991a). The Syntax-Phonology Interface as the Key to metricality: Evidence from Taiwanese Folk Songs. Kansas Working Papers in Linguistics 16, 77-98.
    Hsiao, Yuchau E. (1991b). Syntax, Rhythm and Tone: A Triangular Relationship. Taipei: The Crane Publishing.
    Hsiao, Yuchau E. (1995). Southern Min Tone Sandhi And Theories of Prosodic Phonology. Taipei: Student Book Co., Ltd.
    Hsiao, Yuchau E. (2006). The Metrical Structure of Changhua Folk Verse. Concentric: Studies in Linguistics 32, 1-29.
    Hung, T. (1987). Syntactic and Semantic Aspects of Chinese Tone Sandhi. UCSD.
    Inkelas, Sharon (1989). Prosodic Constituency in the Lexicon. Stanford University.
    Ito, J. and Mester, A. (1997). Sympathy Theory and German Truncation. University of Maryland Working Papers in Linguistics 5.
    Jackendoff, R. (1989). A Comparison of Rhythmic Structure in Music and Language. Phonology and Phonetics 1, 15-44.
    Jun, J. (1998). Generalized Sympathy. NELS-29.
    Kager, R. (2001). Rhythmic directionality by positional licensing.
    Kaisse, Ellen M. (1985). Connected speech: the interaction between syntax and phonology. New York: Academic Press.
    Kenstowicz, Michael (1994). Phonology in Generative Grammar. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Blackwell.
    Kiparsky, Paul (1975). Stress, syntax, and meter. Language 51, 576-616.
    Kiparsky, Paul (1977). The rhythmic structure of English verse. Linguistic Inquiry 8, 189-247.
    Kiparsky, Paul (1979). Metrical Structure Assignment is Cyclic. Linguistic Inquiry 10, 421-441.
    Kiparsky, Paul (1993). Variable Rules. Rutgers Optimality Workshop I New Brunswick, N.J.
    Kisseberth, C. and Abasheikh, M. (1974). Vowel Length in Chi-Mwi:ni-A Case Study of the Role of Grammar in Phonology. Parasession on Natural Phonology: Chicago Linguistic Society.
    Klatt, Dennis H. (1976). Linguistic uses of segmental duration in English: acoustic and perceptual evidence. JASA 59, 1208-1221.
    Kroch, A. S. (1994). Morphosyntactic variation. In Beals et al (ed.), CLS30: The Parasession on Variation in Linguistic Theory 180-201. Chicago: CLS.
    Labov, William (1972). The Internal Evolution of Linguistic Rules. In R. Stockwell and R. Macaulay (eds.), Linguistic Change and Generative Theory 101-171. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
    Lerdahi, F. and Jackendoff, R. (1983). A Generative Theory of Tonal Music. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.
    Li and Thompson (1984). A Functional Reference Grammar. Taipei: The Grane Publishing Co., Ltd.
    Li, Zi-Rong (ed.) (1996). zhoumuniao [woodpecker]. Taipei: Hsin-Yi Foundation
    Liberman, Mark (1975). The intonational system of English. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT
    Liberman, Mark and Prince, Alan (1977). On Stress and Linguistic Rhythm. Linguistic Inquiry 8, 249-336.
    Liberman, Mark and Prince, Alan (1979). The intonational system of English. New York: Garland.
    Lyberg, B. (1979). Final lengthening - partly a consequence of restrictions on the speed of fundamental frequency change. Journal of Phonetics 7, 187-196.
    MaCarthy, John J. (1997). Sympathy & Phonological Opacity. Hopkins Optimality Theory Workshop Maryland Mayfest.
    MaCarthy, John J. (2004). Headed spans and autosegmental spreading. University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
    McCawley, J. (1968). The Phonological Component of a Grammar of Japanese. Mouton: The Hague.
    Nagy, N. and Reynolds, B. (1997). Optimality Theory and variable word-final deletion in Faetar. Language Variation and Change 9, 37-55.
    Nespor, Marina and Vogel, Irene (1982). Prosodic Domains of External Sandhi Rules. In H. van der Hulst and N. Smith (eds.), The Structure of Phonological Representations Dordrecht: Foris Publications.
    Nespor, Marina and Vogel, Irene (1983). Prosodic Structure above the Word. In A. Cutler and D. R. Ladd (eds.), Prosody: Models and Measurements Springer Verlag, Berlin.
    Nespor, Marina and Vogel, Irene (1986). Prosodic phonology. Dordrecht: Foris.
    Odden, David (1987). Kimatuumbi phrasal phonology. Phonology Yearbook 4, 13-26.
    Ohala, John (1986). Consumer`s guide to evidence in phonology. Phonogy Yearbook 3-26.
    Osborn, H. (1966). Warao I: Phonology and morphophonemics. International Journal of American Linguistics 32, 108-123.
    Piera, C. (1980). Spanish Verse and the Theory of Meter. UCLA.
    Pierrehumbert, J. (1980). The Phonology and Phonetics of English Intonation. MIT.
    Pierrehumbert, J. and Liberman, M. Y. (1982). Modelling the Fundamental Frequency of the Voice. Contemporary Psychology 27, 690-692.
    Prince, Alan (1983). Relating to the grid. Linguistic Inquiry 14, 1-100.
    Prince, Alan and Smolensky, Paul (1993). Optimality Theory: Constraint Interaction and Generative Grammar. Blackwell Publishing.
    Prince, Alan and Smolensky, Paul (2004). Optimality Theory: Constraint Interaction and Generative Grammar. Blackwell Publishing.
    Reynolds, William Thomas (1994). Variation and Phonological Theory. Linguistics: University of Pennsylvania.
    Rice, Curt (2000). Generative metrics. In Lisa Chen and Rint Sybesma (eds.), The first Glot International state-of-the-article book: the latest in Linguistics 329-347. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
    Selkirk, Elisabeth (1972). The Phrase Phonology of English and French. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT.
    Selkirk, Elisabeth (1978). On Prosodic Structure and Its Relation to Syntactic Structures. In T. Fretheim (ed.), Nordic Prosody II Trondheim: TAPIR.
    Selkirk, Elisabeth (1981). On the Nature of Phonological Representation. In J. Anderson, J. Laver and T. Myers (eds.), The Cognitive Representation of Speech North Holland: Amsterdam.
    Selkirk, Elisabeth (1984). Phonology and syntax: the relation between sound and structure. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
    Selkirk, Elisabeth (1986). On derived domains in sentence phonology. Phonology Yearbook 3, 371-405.
    Selkirk, Elizabeth (1980). The role of prosodic categories in English word stress. Linguistic Inquiry 11, 563-605.
    Shannon, Claude E. and Weaver, Warren (1949). The mathematical theory of communication. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
    Shih, Chi-lin (1986). The prosodic domain of tone sandhi in Chinese. UCSD.
    Shih, Chi-lin (1990). Mandarin Third Tone Sandhi and Prosodic Structure. In J-L Wang and N. Smith (eds.), Studies in Chinese Phonology: University of California Press.
    Tesar, Bruce (1997). Robust Interpretive Parsing in Metrical Stress Theory. Proceedings of WCCFL XVII 1-30.
    Trager, G. L. and Smith, H. L. J. (1951). An Outline of English Structure. Norman, Oklahoma: Battenburg Press.
    Tseng, Chiu-yu, Pin, Shaohuang and Lee, Yeh-lin (2006). Speech Prosody: Issues, Approaches and Implications. From Traditional Phonology to Modern Speech Processing 1-28.
    Tyron, D. T. (ed.) (1970). An Introduction to Maranungku. Canberra: Australian National University.
    You, Shu-Fen (ed.) (1996a). houzi tiao [The Monkeys Jump]. Taipei: Hsin-Yi Foundation
    You, Shu-Fen (ed.) (1996b). xiao baier [little white goose]. Taipei: Hsin-Yi Foundation
    Youmans, Gilbert (1983). Generative Test for Generative Meter. Language 59, 67-92.
    Youmans, Gilbert (1989). Introduction: rhythm and meter. In Kiparsky and Youmans (eds.), Phonetics and Phonology: rhythm and meter 1-14.
    Zec, Draga (2005). Prosodic differences among function words. Phonology 22, 77-112.
    Zuo, Yan (2002). Classical Chinese Verse Grammar: Coexisting sub-grammars and formal grounding. The Netherlands: Tilburg University.
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    語言學研究所
    93555004
    95
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0093555004
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[Graduate Institute of Linguistics] Theses

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    55500401.pdf226KbAdobe PDF2999View/Open
    55500402.pdf61KbAdobe PDF2896View/Open
    55500403.pdf61KbAdobe PDF2959View/Open
    55500404.pdf157KbAdobe PDF21341View/Open
    55500405.pdf15KbAdobe PDF2925View/Open
    55500406.pdf228KbAdobe PDF21072View/Open
    55500407.pdf63KbAdobe PDF2970View/Open
    55500408.pdf550KbAdobe PDF23645View/Open
    55500409.pdf294KbAdobe PDF21484View/Open
    55500410.pdf199KbAdobe PDF21374View/Open
    55500411.pdf760KbAdobe PDF21180View/Open
    55500412.pdf69KbAdobe PDF21166View/Open
    55500413.pdf560KbAdobe PDF21156View/Open
    55500414.pdf78KbAdobe PDF21338View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback