English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 111200/142120 (78%)
Visitors : 48092811      Online Users : 683
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/34881


    Title: 我國因應船員執業證書國際公約修正案之研究:政策論證之分析
    On the ROC of Policy Regarding the Amendment of the Seafarer Practicing Certificate International Convertion : Analysis Policy Argument
    Authors: 尹台生
    yin,tai-shen
    Contributors: 李明
    Lee,Ming
    尹台生
    yin,tai-shen
    Keywords: 船員訓練發證當值STCW公約
    國際海事組織
    白名單
    港口國管制檢查
    第Ⅱ軌道外交
    STCW 78
    IMO
    White List
    PSC
    TrackⅡdiplomacy
    Date: 2004
    Issue Date: 2009-09-19 15:14:15 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 政策是公權力對大眾利益表現一種型態,為確保其一貫施政品質,公共治理的理論,逐漸重視政策的效果 - 政策論證(policy argument),尤其以全民政治為基礎的政策治理,對於整體資源的投入/產出,必須強化其自體檢核功能。
    航運的操作有兩項基本的動因,一個是船,另一個是船員,兩者缺一不可,然後貨才能「暢其流」,尤其船員的因素,是航運興衰的關鍵動因。我國在邁進開發國家之列時,對於各類專業人才必須予以適當的培訓及保障,整體經濟的生產力才能提升,並能強化競爭力,邁向國際化,航運業界、政府及學界均應有此共識,在面對國際船員訓練、發證的考驗時,同心協力,參與國際海事組織(IMO)船員訓練發證政策的挑戰,突破港口國管制(PSC)的檢查,使船員在工作保障及社會福利有所依循,以符合船員訓練STCW 78/95國際公約修訂的檢查及港口國管制(PSC)的要求標準。
    中國方面,因為是國際海事組織(IMO)的會員,對於船員訓練及發證,均按照STCW78/95國際公約的規定與要求,頒布一系列規章及訓練規範,而且根據中國「民法通則」規定,法律條約沒有規定的,可適用國際慣例,中華民國的船員執業證照則處於相對不確定的狀況,尚待政府的國際政策躓琢。
    由於兩岸經濟依存,政治對立,各自表述,在意識形態上產生不接軌的現象,再加上國際情勢發展的不對稱影響,我國船員訓練主管單位及相關港監部門及學術組織,本於國家利益的基礎上,為謀我國航運業的發展及保障船員的工作權,除強化國內的船員訓練品質,另確有必要務實的參與國際組織相關活動及其相互間的合作,將我國現職船員訓練符合STCW 78/95國際公約之發證政策與執行規定,順利遞送國際海事組織(IMO)的秘書處,並確認發證履行報告,完成從第三走廊(軌道)列入〈白名單〉(White List)之列(如本論文第五章敘述)。
    本研究肇因於國際公約的修訂,影響我國船員訓練執業證書的認可,政府從一貫的船員政策實施過程為核心,配合考試、適任評估,目標是符合國際公約STCW 78/95的標準及船員證照認證的公共治理為論證(policy argument),從質性研究的模式,並依政治學方法論的比較研究法及政策論證的步驟與國際關係(IR)的談判元素,全文以建構類型(constructive typology) 理論,作為理論架構,驗證第三軌道的模式。
    Decision-making is the pattern that shows a certain type of state authority; administrative power displays the attitude to the general interests based on effectiveness of administration. In order to guarantee its consistent administrative quality, the administration theory shows how a state manages its public policy. Also, governments undoubtedly pay much attention to the outcome of them. How those public policies are approved (i.e., policy arguments), also exemplify the fact that decision-making is based on the participation of individuals in whole society. Inputs/output model could strengthen our knowledge from the key function of physical examination.
    There are two basic theories regarding the operation of shipping. One is the ship; with the other one names the seafarer. None of them can be dispensed with—can commodities be transported smoothly only through this understanding. Seafarer`s role, in particular, is the key factor attributing to the shipping frequency. The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has to offer proper crew training so as to guarantee all kinds of qualified personnel in a specific field are sufficient while striding forward to develop its economy. Only if the productivity could be promoted, can the ROC strengthen competitiveness, march forward to further internationalization. Shipping could reflect a certain country’s industrial level, governmental effectiveness and its educational development. As local trains’ seafarers— instead of by international authorities, this country encounters the license-issuing problem. Only through concerted efforts, can this country meet ordeals when participating in International Maritime Organization (IMO)’s training and license-issuing process, pass through the inspection that the port state controlled (PSC), make seafarers’ rights guaranteed. In addition, the ROC has to assure seafarers’ welfare, in accordance with the inspection of the international convention revising (STCW 78/95) and to the standard demanded by the port state control (PSC).
    The People’s Republic of China (PRC) is a member of International Maritime Organization (IMO). The PRC obeys the regulations and request of international convention STCW78/95, the general rule of the civil law, and announces a series of training rules when training seafarers and issuing licenses. The PRC also declares that they could apply to international custom if their lacks of local regulations. In contrast, the seafarers of the Republic of China are still not for sure that they could be issues operation certificates. The ROC government is awaited to do something.
    Economies along the two sides of the Taiwan Straits have become mutually interdependent, whereas their political relations are still stridently confrontational. Due to the huge gap between their international statuses, the authorities that responsible for seafarer training and harbor supervisors, as well as scholars, have to promote the training quality of our seafarers, participate caucuses and activities of various international organizations so as to assure the ROC’s sea transportation and their working opportunities. The government has to submit its 78/95 STCW regulations training post crewman to the Secretariat of the International Maritime Organization (IMO), confirm license-issuing and fulfill the report, enlist itself to the White List from the “Third Track (as noted in Chapter 5).”
    This research could be attributed to the revision of the international convention, which affects the validity the ROC’s approval to the certificates in seafarer training and issuing licenses. The government designs courses from consistent policies of seafarer training, helping seafarers pass examination and evaluation and finally reach the standard of international convention named STCW 78/95. In addition, one of the government’s objectives is to comply the policy argument of governance concerning license issuing. This author tries to apply to quality research, comparative methodology, and negotiating factor in international relations (IR), and constructive typology for the purpose of verifying the operation of the “Third Track.”
    Reference: 中文部分
    尹章華、彭銘淵,〈海事行政法(上冊)〉,台北:文笙書局,1995。
    尹台生,〈兩岸船員法比較初探〉,《第一屆海峽兩岸航運科技學術研討會論文集》,
    國立台灣海洋大學、中國大連海事大學主辦,2002,頁279-283。
    尹台生,〈航政政策與公共行政的接軌及其時間落差–以現職船員訓練與海事技職教育競合案例政策論證」〉,《2000海事技職教育研討會論文集》,國立高雄海洋技術學院、教育部技職司主辦,2000,頁1-5。
    尹台生,〈後STCW 78/95時期,船員訓練及發證—遞送報告知悉/第三走廊突初探〉,
    《航運管理學術研討會學術論文集》,國立高雄海洋技術學院航運管理系主辦,2002,頁289-293。
    尹台生,〈因應國際公約STCW 78/95船員執業證書的修正案論我國現職船員訓練發證政策論證〉,《兩岸海員工會會務交流研討會論文集》,中華海員總工會,2003,頁69-103。
    石之瑜、黃競涓,〈我國第二軌道外交中的,國家-社會論述〉,《政治科學論叢》,國立台灣大學政治學系出版,1999,第十一期,頁103-125。
    交通部,〈一九七八年航海人員訓練、發證及當值標準國際公約〉,台北,1978。
    交通部,〈一九七八年航海人員訓練、發證及當值標準國際公約一九九五修正案〉,
    台北,1995。
    交通部,〈國輪船員供需特性之分析與對策之研究〉,台北,1990。
    交通部,〈船員法草案〉,1991。
    交通部,〈交通部航政局恢復設立案簡報資料〉,台北,1992。
    交通部,〈全國交通會議船員培訓計畫推動議題〉,台北,2001。
    交通部,〈海商法修正草案〉,台北,1995。
    交通部,〈海商法〉,台北,1998。
    交通部,〈船員法〉,台北,1999。
    交通部,〈船員法施行細則〉,台北,2004。
    行政院陸委會,〈大陸海空運輸產業概況〉,台北,2000。
    任德厚,〈政治學〉,台北:三民書局股份有限公司,1995。
    於世成,〈中國的航運法律體系〉,北京,《海商法研究》,北京大學海商法研究中心
    主編,2003年,第一輯,頁273-294。
    易君博,〈政治理論與研究方法〉,台北:三民書局股份有限公司,2003。
    林碧炤,〈國際政治與外交政策〉,台北:五南圖書出版公司,2002。
    高永光,〈從博奕理論分析聯合政府〉,《台灣民主體制的新選擇? 》,財團法人新台灣人文教基金會,台北,2000,頁31-56 。
    高尚全,〈中國的經濟體制改革〉,北京:人民出版社,1991。
    郭炳秀,〈依國際安全管理章程之規定建立船舶安全管理系統之研究〉,國立台灣海洋大學航運管理學研究所碩士論文,1997。
    陳偉炯主編,〈船舶安全與管理〉,大連:大連海事大學出版社,1998。
    陳彥慈,〈金門酒廠民營化政策論證分析〉,國立政治大學公共行政學系研究所碩士
    論文,2003。
    陳雙環,〈當前中華民國反恐對策之研究〉,國立政治大學外交學系研究所碩士論文,2004。
    馮正民、鍾政棋、袁劍雲,〈船舶設籍對航商船員成本之影響〉,《運輸計劃季刊》,
    第三十一卷第三期,2002,頁663-678。
    黃承傳、鍾政棋,〈我國散裝船舶設籍關鍵影響因素之分析〉,《運輸計劃季刊》,
    第三十四卷第一期,2005,頁27-62。
    梁宇賢,〈兩岸海商法比較導讀〉,台北:五南圖書出版公司,1998。
    孫本初、劉祥得,〈政策論證興起之探討〉,《中國行政》,國立政治大學公企中心出版,第六十七期,2000,頁1-28。
    蔣克雄,〈模擬設施應用於我國航海人員之探討〉,國立台灣海洋大學商船學系碩士
    論文,2005。
    鄧方 譯,David M,Kreps著,〈賽局理論與經濟模型〉,台北:五南圖書出版公司,1996。
    趙居業,〈我國船員雇傭契約之研究〉,國立台灣海洋大學航運管理學研究所碩士論文,2002。
    趙國玲,〈海商法概論〉,北京:北京大學出版公司,2000。
    蔡存強,〈STCW 78/95公約的實施與中國高等航海教育的改革〉,《兩岸海事教育及港航企業合作研討會論文集》,國立台灣海洋大學、中國海事學會主辦,1998,頁1-8。
    鄭經略,〈船員職務與海運法規〉,大連:大連海事大學出版社,1993。
    賴阿蕊,〈船員福利法規之研究〉,國立台灣海洋大學海洋法律研究所碩士論文,1993。
    謝淑貞,〈賽局理論〉,台北:雙業書廊有限公司公司,1996。
    饒戈屏,〈國際組織法〉,北京:北京大學出版公司,2000。
    外文部分
    1. Allison, Graham T. Essence of Decision: Explaining the Cuban Missile Crisis. Boston, MA: Little, Brown and Company, : 1971.
    2. Goldstein, Joshua S. International Relations. New York, N.Y.: Longman, fifth edition, 2003.
    3. International Maritime Organization, International Convention on Standards of Training Certification and Watchkeeping for Seafarers,1978. London: 1978.
    4. International Maritime Organization, International Safety Management Code. London, 1994.
    5. International Maritime Organization, International Convention on Standards of Training,Certification and Watchkeeping for Seafarers,1978, as amended in 1995. U.K.:London , 1996.
    6. Jones, Gareth R., Jennifer M. George, and Charles W. L. Hill. Contemporary Management: New York, NY: Irwin McGraw-Hill, second edition, 2000.
    7. Lloyd of Register. A Guide to Port State Control. London, 1996.
    8. Robbins, Stephen P. Management. New York, NY: Prentice-Hall International Inc., fourth edition ,1994.
    網路資源
    1.國際海事組織 2004 www.imo.org
    2.交通海事網路 2004 www.mtnet.gov.tw
    3.海員總工會 2004 www.ncsu.org.tw
    4.交通部 2004 www.motc.gov.tw
    5.美國海岸防衛隊 2004 www.uscg.mil
    6.東京備忘錄 2004 www.tokyo-mou.org
    7.國際船聯會 2004 www.marisec.org/isf
    8.外交部 2006 www.mofa.gov.tw
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    行政管理碩士學程
    91921004
    93
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0919210041
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[行政管理碩士學程(MEPA)] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    21004101.pdf13KbAdobe PDF2748View/Open
    21004102.pdf16KbAdobe PDF2822View/Open
    21004103.pdf20KbAdobe PDF21322View/Open
    21004104.pdf16KbAdobe PDF2893View/Open
    21004105.pdf18KbAdobe PDF2785View/Open
    21004106.pdf87KbAdobe PDF21968View/Open
    21004107.pdf194KbAdobe PDF29013View/Open
    21004108.pdf55KbAdobe PDF22311View/Open
    21004109.pdf150KbAdobe PDF21786View/Open
    21004110.pdf27KbAdobe PDF21368View/Open
    21004111.pdf98KbAdobe PDF2918View/Open
    21004112.pdf22KbAdobe PDF21319View/Open
    21004113.pdf90KbAdobe PDF25335View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback