English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 110936/141856 (78%)
Visitors : 47724023      Online Users : 975
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    政大機構典藏 > 商學院 > 企業管理學系 > 學位論文 >  Item 140.119/35066
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/35066


    Title: 思考模式與自我構念、購後失調之關係-以挪威消費者為例
    Authors: 湯俊章
    Tang,Jiunjang
    Contributors: 別蓮蒂
    湯俊章
    Tang,Jiunjang
    Keywords: 自我構念
    系統式思考
    簡則式思考
    購後失調
    功能消費
    享樂消費
    Date: 2004
    Issue Date: 2009-09-18 13:42:46 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 自從歐盟成立後,我國對其出口值每年皆有百分之十以上的成長率,歐洲市場的重要性不言可喻,但國內學術界對歐洲消費者的研究則屈指可數。造成此現象原因有二,首先是過去台灣對歐洲市場的重視程度不比中、美、日。其次則為歐洲資料取得不易,即使是二手資料都無相關獲取管道,這跟台灣大部分的留外歸國師資有很大的關係,相較於美、中、日,學者對歐洲的連結關係較弱。但隨著國內赴歐洲交換學生的趨勢漸起,提供國內學術界另一瞭解歐洲市場的機會。因此,該如何利用此機會,以化解實務界對歐洲消費者不瞭解的窘境,已成為當務之急。
    本研究首先從過去跨文化研究中個人與集體主義分類開始,延伸至單一文化體下個人的獨立與互賴自我構念與消費者思考模式的差異。推論出個人主義下的消費者傾向使用系統式的思考模式,並且大部分的人皆具有獨立的自我構念;而集體主義下的消費者則傾向使用簡則式的思考模式,並且大部分的人皆具有互賴的自我構念。但由於獨立、互賴自我構念與系統、簡則式思考可並存於單一文化體之下,因此,本研究在單一文化體下探討這些關係是否依然存在。此外,消費者使用的思考模式將決定其獲取資訊的來源與方式。對於不同的思考方式所做的購買決策若產生失誤時,消費者本身所習慣採用的思考模式與當次的消費價值將如何影響消費者的購後失調,則為本研究欲探討的另一課題。
    經過驗證後發現在探討個人自我構念與思考模式的關係部分,北歐文化體制下的挪威消費者的獨立自我構念與系統式思考相關,而互賴自我構念則與簡則式思考相關,這項結論支持了在單一文化體之下此關係仍然存在。此外,在探討思考模式對購後失調的影響方面,習慣於使用簡則式思考的消費者,在面對功能性消費時會產生較低的購後失調,而對於享樂性消費,則會產生較高的購後失調。但是系統式思考並不會對購後失調產生顯著的影響,此點則與一般認為愈理性決策的人失調程度愈低的常識相違背。
    最後,本研究從研究結論中,提出數點可事先降低消費者購後失調的策略建議與方案,做為實務界能有效降低補償失調消費者的成本,並提昇消費者的再購率的執行方法。而對某些無法補償失調消費者的交易型產業而言,這樣的策略建議更是其唯一降低消費者購後失調的著力點。
    The importance of the European market goes without saying. After the establishment of the European Union, Taiwan’s export value to the European market increased over 10% every year, but the domestic academia are still few in studying about this topic. Two reasons cause this phenomenon. First of all, compared to entering Chinese, American and Japanese markets, European markets were the last choice in the past. Secondly, it is difficult to obtain European material, even second-hand material, because most of Taiwan’s scholars, who have mostly studied in America or Japan, have relatively weak relationships with European academic circles. However, with the number of exchange students going to Europe rising, this offers domestic academia a chance to access the European market. Hence how to utilize this trend of exchange students to Europe to dissolve the awkward situation of having an unknown European market has already become the academia’s top priority.
    This research extends from the difference between Individualism and Collectivism, one of the cross-cultural dimensions, to the difference between independent and dependent self-construct of consumers in a culture. Consumers under individualism incline to use the systemic thinking style and most of them own independent self-construct; consumers under collectivism incline to use the hedonic thinking style and most of them own dependent self-construct. Independent and dependent self-construct and systemic and hedonic thinking style can coexist in a single cultural body, so this research wants to know if the relationships among these variables still exist under the same single culture. In addition, the thinking style that consumers use decides the sources of information that consumers adopt. Hence, another issue this research wants to discuss is about how the consumers’ thinking style relates to their post-purchasing dissonance at their unsatisfied consumption. To utilize the chance of exchanging student to Norway, the research regards consumers in Oslo, Norway as the research sample through the questionnaire investigation. The total amount of issues is 813 among which the amount of 688 was retrieved, and the count of effective samples is 355.
    The research finds that independent construct correlates with systemic thinking style and dependent construct correlates with hedonic thinking style under the cultural system in the north of Europe. This conclusion has supported that this relation under the single cultural body still exists. In addition, consumers, who are accustomed to the hedonic thinking style, will bring lower post-purchasing dissonance under functional consumption, but higher post-purchasing dissonance under hedonic consumption. However, systemic thinking style has no significant influence on post-purchasing dissonance and this point violates the common sense that rational thinking will bring lower dissonance. Finally, this research develops some advice from the study’s conclusion to reduce consumer’s post-purchasing dissonance and to raise the rate of repurchasing in hopes to decrease the cost of business compensating unsatisfied consumers.
    Reference: 中文部分
    吳祉芸 (1992),「兩岸品牌個性之跨文化比較-以報紙廣告為例」,國立政治大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
    葉芳妤 (1993),「比較台灣與日本兩國消費者購買型態之差異-以洗面乳為研究對象」,國立嘉義大學管理研究所碩士論文。
    劉又菁 (1992),「從欲求利益觀點探討台灣電影之市場區隔-以美國電影為研究對象」,國立交通大學管理科學研究所碩士論文。
    劉宗其、李奇動、黃吉村、渥頓 (2001),「服務失誤類型、補償措施與再惠顧率之探索性研究—以CIT法應用於餐飲業為例」,管理評論,第二十一卷第三期,頁49-68。
    劉峻榮 (1993),「義大利冰淇淋之市場區隔研究」,國立台北大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
    英文部分
    Aaker, Jennifer L. and Durairaj Maheswaran (1997). The Effect of Cultural Orientation on Persuasion. Journal of Consumer Research, Vol.24(December), PP.315-324.
    Anderson, Rolph E. (1973). Consumer Dissatisfaction: The Effect of Disconfirmed Expectancy on Perceived Product Performance. Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 10 (February), PP. 38-44.
    Babin, Barry J., William R. Darden, and Mitch Griffin (1994). Work and/or Fun: Measuring Hedonic and Utilitarian Shopping Value. Journal of Consumer Research, Vol.20, PP.644-653.
    Bitner, Mary Jo, Bernard H. Booms, and Mary Stanfield Tetreault (1990). The Service Encounter: Diagnosing Favorable and Unfavorable Incidents. Journal of Marketing, Vol.54, PP.71-84.
    Bitner, Mary Jo, Bernard H. Booms, and Lois A. Mohr (1994). Critical Service Encounters: The Employee’s Viewpoint. Journal of Marketing, Vol.58, PP.95-106.
    Brooker, Peter (1984). Aircraft Collision Risk in the North Atlantic Region. The Journal of Operational Research Society, Vol.35, PP.695-704.
    Brucks, Merrie (1985). The Effect of Product Class Knowledge on Information Search Behavior. Journal of Consumer Research, Vol.12, PP.1-16.
    Cacioppo, John T. and Richard E. Petty (1982). The Need for Cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol.42, PP.116-131.
    Chaiken, Shelly (1980). Heuristic versus Systematic Information Processing and the Use of Source versus Message Cues in Persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol.39, No.5, PP.752-766.
    Chaiken, Shelly, Danny Axsom, and Suzanne Yates (1987). Audience Response as a Heuristic Cue in Persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol.53, P.30.
    Chaiken, Shelly and Akiva Liberman (1991). Value Conflict and Thought-Induced Attitude Change. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, Vol.27, P. 203.
    Chaiken, Shelly and Durairaj Mahesswaran (1991). Promoting Systematic Processing in Low-Motivation Settings: Effect of Incongruent Information on Processing and Judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol.61, No.1, PP.13-25.
    Chaiken, Shelly and Durairaj Maheswaran (1994). Heuristic Processing Can Bias Systematic Processing: Effects of Source Credibility, Argument Ambiguity, and Task Importance on Attitude Judgement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol.66, P.460.
    Cooper, Joel and Russell H. Fazio (1984). A New Look at Dissonance Theory. Advances in Experimental social Psychology, Vol. 17, PP. 229-266.
    Crowley, Ayn E. and Eric R. Spangenberg (1992). Measuring the Hedonic and Utilitarian Dimensions of Attitudes toward Product Categories. Marketing Letters, Vol.3, Nov.3, PP.239-249.
    Cummings, William H. and M. Venkatesan (1976). Cognitive Dissonance and Consumer Behavior: A Review of the Evidence, Journal of Marketing Research, Vol.13, No.3, PP.303-308.
    Festinger, Leon (1957). A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance. Ch2. PP.25-42, Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA.
    Flanagan, John C. (1954). The Critical Incident Technique. Psychological Bulletin, Vol.51, PP.327-351.
    Hempel, Donald J. (1977). Consumer Satisfaction with the Home Buying Process: Conceptualization and Measurement. The Conceptualization and Measurement of Consumer Satisfaction and Dissatisfaction, H. Keith Hunt (ed.) Cambridge. MA: Marketing Science Institute: 7-9.
    Hirschman, Elizabeth C. and Morris B. Holbrook (1982). Hedonic Consumption: Emerging Concepts, Methods, and Propositions. Journal of Marketing, Vol.46, PP.92-101.
    Hirschman, Elizabeth C. and Morris B. Holbrook (1982). The Experiential Aspects of Consumption: Consumer Fantasies, Feelings, and Fun. Journal of Consumer Research, Vol.9 (September), PP.132-139.
    Hoffman, K Douglas, Scott W. Kelley, and Holly M. Rotalsky (1995). Tracking Service Failures and Employee Recovery Efforts. The Journal of Service Marketing, Vol.9, Nov.2, PP.49-61.
    Hoffman, K Douglas, Scott W. Kelley, and Beth C. Chung (2003). A CIT Investigation of Servicescape Failure and Associated Recovery Strategies. The Journal of Service Marketing, Vol.17, 4/5, P. 322.
    Holbrook, Morris B (1990). Actions and Reactions in the Consumption Experience: the Complementary Roles of Reasons and Emotions in Consumer Behavior. Research in Consumer Behavior, Vol.4, PP.131-163.
    Holbrook, Morris B (1999). Introduction to Consumer Value: A Framework for Analysis and Research. Routledge, London, PP. 1-28.
    Holbrook, Morris B. and Michela Addis (2001). On the Conceptual Link between Mass Customization and Experiential Consumption: An Explosion of Subjectivity. Journal of Consumer Behavior, Vol.1, PP.50-66.
    Holloway, Robert J. (1967). An Experiment on Consumer Dissonance. Journal of Marketing, Vol.31, PP.39-43.
    Hofstede, Geert (1980). Culture’s Consequences. Ch.5 PP.213-259, Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
    Hofstede, Geert (1983). National Cultures in Four Dimensions: A Research-based Theory of Cultural Differences among Nations. Studies of Management and Organization Int., Vol.13, No.1-2, PP.46-74.
    Hofstede, Geert (1990). Culture and Organizations: Software of the Mind. Ch.3 PP.49-78, Landon: Mcgraw-Hill.
    Mattila, Anna S. (2003). The Impact of Cognitive Inertia on Postconsumption Evaluation Process. Academy of Marketing Science, Vol.31. No.2, PP.288-299.
    Markus, Hazel Rose and Shinobu Kitayama (1991). Culture and the Self: Implications for Cognition, Emotion, and Motivation. Psychological Review, Vol.98, No.2, PP.224-253.
    McElroy, Todd and John J. Seta (2003). Framing effects: An Analytic-Holistic Perspective. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, vol.39, PP.610-617.
    Montgomery, C. and Peter J. Barnes (1993). POSTDIS: A Short Rating Scale for Measuring Postpurchase Dissonance. Journal of Consumer Satisfaction, Dissatisfaction and Complaining Behavior, Vol.6, PP.204-216.
    Neuwirth, Kurt, Edward Frederick, and Charles Mayo (2002). Person-Effects and Heuristic-Systematic Processing. Communication Research, Vol.29, NO.3 PP.320-359.
    Oliver, Richard L. (1997). Satisfaction: A Behavioral Perspective on the Consumer. McGraw-Hill Book company, New York.
    Oliver, Richard L. and Wayne Desarbo S. (1988). Response Determinants in Satisfaction Judgements. Journal of Consumer Research, Vol.14, PP.495-508.
    Russo, J. Edward, Margaret G. Meloy, and Victoria Husted Medvec (1998). Predecisional Distortion of Product Information. Journal of Marketing Research, Vol.35, PP.438-452.
    Shiloh Shoshana, Efrat Salton, and Dana Sharabi (2002). Individual Differences in Rational and Intuitive Thinking Styles as Predictors of Heuristic Responses and Framing Effects. Personality and Individual Differences, No.32, PP.415-429.
    Shostack, Lynn (1977). Breaking Free from Product Marketing, Journal of Marketing, April, PP.73-80.
    Shostack, Lynn (1985). Planning the Service Encounter, In Czepjel J., M. Solomon and C. Suprenant (eds) The Service Encounter, 1-23. Mass.: Lexington Books.
    Simon, Herbert A. (1976). Administrative Behavior (3rd ed.). New York: Free Press.
    Singelis, Theodore M. (1994). The Measurement of Independent and Interdependent Self-Construals. The Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Vol.20, No.5, PP.580-591.
    Soloman, Michael R., Carol Surprenant, John A. Czepiel, and Evelyn G. Gutman (1985). A Role Theory Perspective on Dynamic Interactions: The Service Encounter. Journal of Marketing, Vol.49, Winter, PP. 99-111.
    Strong, Edward K. (1925). An Interest Test for Personnel Managers. Personnel Journal, Vol.5, PP. 194-204.
    Sweeney, Jillian C., Douglas Hausknecht, and Geoffrey N. Soutar (2000). Cognitive Dissonance after Purchase: A Multidimensional Scale. Journal of Psychology and Marketing, Vol.17, No.5, PP.369-386.
    Sweeney, Jillian C. and Geoffrey N. Soutar (2003). Are There Cognitive Dissonance Segments? Australian Journal of Management, Vol.28, No.3, PP.227-249.
    Taylor, Steven E., and Fiske S. (1978). Salience, Attention, and Attribution: Top of the Head Phenomena. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Vol.11, PP.249-288.
    Triandis, Harry C. (1985). Allocentric versus Idiocentric Tendencies: Convergent and Discriminant Validation. Journal of Respective Personality, Vol.19, PP.395-415.
    Triandis, Harry C. and Robert Bontempo (1988). Individualism and Collectivism: Cross-Cultural Perspectives on Self-Ingroup Relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol.54, P.323.
    Triandis, Harry C. (1989). The Self and Social Behavior in Differing Cultural Contexts. Psychological Review, Vol.96, lss. 3, P.506.
    Triandis, Harry C. (1994). Individualism and Collectivism: Theory, Method, and Applications. Ch. 3 P.47, CA: Sage.
    Triandis, Harry. C. and Eunkook M. Suh (2002). Cultural Influences on Personality. Annual Review of Psychology, Vol.53, PP.133-160.
    Watkins, Harry S.and Raymond Liu (1996). Collectivism, Individualism and In-group Membership: Implications for Consumer Complaining Behaviors in Multicultural Contexts. Journal of International Consumer Marketing, Vol.8, PP.69-94.
    Webster, Cynthia and D. S. Sundaram (1998). Service Consumption Criticality in Failure Recovery. Journal of Business Research, Vol.41, PP. 153-159.
    Wellish, Hans (1972). From Information Science to Informatics: A Terminological Investigation. Journal of Librarianship, Vol.4, PP.158-187.
    Zanna, Mark P. and Gerald N. Sande (1987). The Effects of Collective Actions on the Attitudes of Individual Group Members: A Dissonance Analysis. Social Influence: the Ontario Symposium, Vol.5, PP.151-163.
    Zenhausern, Robert (1978). Imagery, Cerebral Dominance and Style of Thinking: A Unified Field Model. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, Vol.12, PP.381-384.
    Zenhausern, Robert and Leslie Nickel (1979). Hemispheric Dominance and Maze Learning. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, Vol. 14(6), PP.435-436.
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    企業管理研究所
    92355081
    93
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0923550811
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[企業管理學系] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    55081101.pdf59KbAdobe PDF2664View/Open
    55081102.pdf168KbAdobe PDF2703View/Open
    55081103.pdf46KbAdobe PDF2761View/Open
    55081104.pdf75KbAdobe PDF2851View/Open
    55081105.pdf52KbAdobe PDF2969View/Open
    55081106.pdf185KbAdobe PDF22885View/Open
    55081107.pdf193KbAdobe PDF21411View/Open
    55081108.pdf337KbAdobe PDF2769View/Open
    55081109.pdf85KbAdobe PDF2777View/Open
    55081110.pdf52KbAdobe PDF2769View/Open
    55081111.pdf48KbAdobe PDF2965View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback