English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 111283/142199 (78%)
Visitors : 48171466      Online Users : 625
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    政大機構典藏 > 商學院 > 企業管理學系 > 學位論文 >  Item 140.119/36832
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/36832


    Title: 以整合觀點分析胡雪巖之管理行為
    Authors: 黃漢儀
    Huang, Han-Yi
    Contributors: 司徒達賢
    黃漢儀
    Huang, Han-Yi
    Keywords: 政商關係
    整合觀點
    管理矩陣
    胡雪巖
    管理學的新世界
    Date: 2008
    Issue Date: 2009-09-18 19:53:14 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 司徒達賢提出「管理工作的核心本質是整合」之觀念,藉由「管理矩陣」此理論架構綜合各家管理觀念,分析實務管理行為,提供貫通理論與實務之間的橋樑。在此研究架構下,本研究選擇以高陽所著《胡雪巖》小說系列為研究文本,以「整合」為核心觀點、「管理矩陣」為分析架構,探討文本中的管理與整合行為,目的在深入探討整合觀點的管理行為外,也為求能在具體可見的管理行為之上,能加入更多形成行為與決策的人性與情感等無形因素的探索。
    本研究從兩種角度進行整合觀點分析,首先挑選文本中具有較豐富之整合行為、管理意涵,以及分析深度的三個關鍵事件「漕米海運」、「爭奪洋槍」與「左李相爭」,深入剖析每一個角色的六大管理元素、其所位處之管理階層、以及其整合行為之深層涵意。另一角度則由管理議題出發,本研究從原有文本以及上述關鍵事件的分析中,歸納出近來受社會關注且具有分析價值的管理議題-「政商關係」作為文本研究之延伸。
    透過上述分析,本研究將分別由三個關鍵事件分析與政商關係管理議題分析中,透過歸納與概念化的分析發展管理命題,將本研究於分析過程中之各項特定性(specific)發現,轉化為通用性(general)的立論。期望透過本研究,能提供「整合觀點」分析架構的具體實例,使本研究結果更具實務上的應用價值,同時帶給胡雪巖研究全新的觀點。
    Reference: 壹、中文部分
    參考書籍:
    司徒達賢(2004),打造未來領導人,台北:天下雜誌。
    司徒達賢(2005),策略管理新論-觀念架構與分析方法,台北:智勝文化。
    司徒達賢(2005),管理學的新世界,台北:天下文化。
    巫和懋,夏珍(2002),賽局高手,台北:時報。
    高陽(1973),胡雪巖上中下集,台北:聯經
    高陽(1977),紅頂商人,台北:聯經
    高陽(1987),燈火樓台上下集,台北:聯經
    夏春祥(1997),「文本分析與傳播研究」,新聞學研究,54;141-165。
    游美惠(2000),「內容分析、文本分析與論述分析在社會研究的運用」,調查研究,8:5-42。
    參考論文:
    邱承漢(2006),「以整合觀點分析『課長島耕作』之管理行為」,國立政治大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
    宋惠中(1994),「票商與晚清的官僚體系(1862--1911)」,國立中正大學歷史學系碩士論文。
    林佑聰(2002),「政商關係與股東財富」,國立台灣科技大學企業管理學系碩士論文。
    林政忠(1997),「唐代的商人-並論政商關係」,中國文化大學史學研究所碩士論文。
    吳一凡(2006),「以整合觀點分析『鹿鼎記』之管理行為」,國立政治大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
    酒小萍(2005),「以管理矩陣解析績效評估---以I公司為例」,國立政治大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
    高若蘭(1997),「高陽歷史小說『胡雪巖三部曲』研究」,國立成功大學中國文學系碩士論文。
    張雅菁(2001),「制度關係重要嗎?」,國立中興大學企業管理學系研究所碩士論文。
    貳、英文部分
    Aiken, Michael and Jerald Hage (1968). “Organizational interdependence and intraorganizational structure”, American Sociological Review, 33, 912-931.
    Allen.& Porter (1983). Organizational Influence Process. London:Foresnan and Company.
    Aplin, J., and Hegarty, H. (1980). “Political influence: Strategies employed by organizations to impact legislation in business and economic matters”, Academy of Management Journal, 23, pp. 438-450.
    Baum, J. A. C. and C. Oliver (1991). “Institutional linkages and organizational mortality”, Administrative Science Quarterly, 36, pp. 187-218
    Baysinger, B. (1984). “Domain maintenance as an objective of business political activity: An expanded typology”, Academy of Management Review, 9, pp.248-258.
    Berger, A. A. (1995). Cultural Criticism: A Primer of Key Concepts. London: Sage.
    Boddewyn, J. and Brewer, T. (1994). “International business political behavior: New theoretical directions”, Academy of Management Review, 19, pp.119-143.
    Boons, F.A. and L. Strannegard (2000). “Organizations coping with their natural environment”, Int. Studies of Management & Organization, 30(3) pp. 7-17.
    Burt, R. S. (1992). Structural holes: The social structure of competition. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
    Burt, R.S. (2000). The network structure of social capital. In Sutton, R. I. & Staw, B. M.(Eds.) Research in Organizational Behavior, 22. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
    DiMaggio, P.J. and W.W. Powell (1983). “The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields”, American Sociological Review, 48, pp.147-160.
    Cross, R., Borgatti, S. P., & Parket, A. (2002). Making invisible work visible : Using social network analysis to support strategic collaboration. California Management Review, 44(2), 25.
    Fligstein, N. (1991). “The structural transformation of American industry: An institutional account of the causes of diversification in the largest firms, 1919-1979”, in W.W. Powell and P.J. DiMaggio (eds.), The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis. Chigago: University of Chicago Press.
    Graen, G. B., & Scandura, T. A. (1987). Toward a psychology of dyadic organizing. Research in Organizationl Behavior, 9, 175-208.
    Hanneman, R. A. (2001). Introduction to Social Network Methods: Department of Sociology. University of California, Riverside.
    Hillman, A.J., A. Zardkoohi and L. Bierman (1999). “Corporate political strategies and firm performance: indications of firm-specifics benefits from personal service in the U.S. government”, Strategic Management Journal, 20, pp. 67-81.
    Ibarra, H. (1993). Network centrality, power, and innovation involvement : Determinants of technical and administrative roles. Academy of Management Journal, 36(3), 471-501.
    Katz, R.L. (1974). The Skills of an Effective Administrator.Harvard Buniness Review, September-Octorber, 90-102
    Koo, Hagen (1987). “The Interplay of State, Social Class, and World System in East Asian Development: the Case of South Korea and Taiwan”, in F. Deyo. (ed.), The Political Economy of New Asian Industrialism. London: Cornell University Press.
    Krackhardt, D., & Porter, L. W. (1986). When friends leave: A structural analysis of the relationship between turnover and stayers’ attitudes. Administrative Science Quarterly, 30, 242-261.
    Lindblom, Charles E. (1977). Politics and Markets: The world’s Political-Economic System. New York: Basic Books.
    Meyer, J.W. and B. Rowan (1977). “Institutional organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony”, American Journal of Sociology, 83, pp. 340-363.
    Miner, Anne S., Terry L. Amburgey and Timothy Strearns (1990). “Interorganizational linkages and population dynamics: Buffering and transformational shields”, Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, pp.689-713.
    Nahapiet, J., & Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social capital, intellectual capital and the organizational advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23, 242-266.
    Oliver, C. (1991). “Strategic responses to institutional processes”, Acadamy of Management Review, 16, pp.145-179.
    Oliver, C. (1996). “The institutional embeddedness of economic activity”, Advances in Strategic Management, 13, pp.163-186.
    Scott, J. (2000). Social Network Analysis. London: SAGE.
    Scott, W.R. (1995). Institutions and Organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
    Sparrowe, R. T., Liden, R. C., Wayne, S. J., & Kraimer, M. L. (2001) Social networks and the performance of individuals and groups. Academy of Management Journal, 44(2), 316-325.
    Streeck, wolfgang and Philippe C. Schmitter (1985). “Community, Marget, State-and Association? The Prospective Contribution of Interest Governance to Social Order”, in Wolfgang Streeck and Philippe C. Schmitter (eds.), Private Interest Government: Beyond Market and State. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
    Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. (1994). Social network analysis. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Cambridge University Press.
    Watson, G. W., & Papamacrcos, S. D (2002). Social capital and organizational commitment. Journal of Business and Psychology, 16(4), 537-552.
    Wolf, M. (1988). Communication research and textual analysis: Prospects and problems of theoretical convergence. European Journal of Communication .3 :135-149.
    Zucker, L.G. (1987). “Institutional theories of organization”, Annual Review of Sociology, 13, pp.443-464.
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    企業管理研究所
    93355044
    97
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0093355044
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[企業管理學系] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    35504401.pdf91KbAdobe PDF2809View/Open
    35504402.pdf137KbAdobe PDF2880View/Open
    35504403.pdf136KbAdobe PDF2893View/Open
    35504404.pdf164KbAdobe PDF2959View/Open
    35504405.pdf235KbAdobe PDF21388View/Open
    35504406.pdf207KbAdobe PDF2916View/Open
    35504407.pdf407KbAdobe PDF21536View/Open
    35504408.pdf509KbAdobe PDF21581View/Open
    35504409.pdf586KbAdobe PDF21764View/Open
    35504410.pdf302KbAdobe PDF21163View/Open
    35504411.pdf326KbAdobe PDF2971View/Open
    35504412.pdf232KbAdobe PDF2871View/Open
    35504413.pdf152KbAdobe PDF21052View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback