| Reference: | 中文部份
1. 2007電視機製造業景氣動態報告，台灣經濟研究院產經資料庫。
2. 2006消費性電子業景氣趨勢調查報告，台灣經濟研究院產經資料庫。
3. 高登第譯（2001），Aaker, David A.等著，品牌管理，台北：天下遠見。
4. 姜漢儀（2007），台灣液晶電視市場發展趨勢與消費需求分析，資訊市場情報中心財團法人資訊工業策進會，未出版。
5. 姜漢儀（2008），台灣液晶電視產品功能訴求偏好分析專題研究報告，資訊市場情報中心財團法人資訊工業策進會，未出版。
6. 邱皓政（2004），「量化研究與統計分析」，台北：五南出版社。
7. 黃俊英（2000），多變量分析，台北：中國經濟企業研究所。
8. 周文賢，張欽富（2000），聯合分析在產品設計之應用，台北：華泰文化。
9. 蔡東峻，吳萬益與李奇勳（2004），價格、保證及來源國形象對產品評價與購買意願的影響，管理學報，第21卷第1期，21-46
10. 莊逸哲（1997），「產品成本與利益屬性對消費者行為之影響－以信用卡之聯合分析為例」，國立政治大學國際貿易所碩士論文。
11. 沈佳穎（2003），「以聯合分析法探討消費者對忠誠方案屬性之偏好」，國立政治大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
12. 陳選賢（2005），「LCD TV 產品經營模式與產業背景之關係－以東元與明基為例」，元智大學管理研究所碩士論文。
13. 楊正瑀（2002），「不同程度產品知識及多重外在提示對網路購物意願之影響」，國立交通大學管理科學系碩士論文。
14. 蔡璧旭（2004），「液晶電視產品分析與最佳定價模式」，國立交通大學管理學院管理科學學程碩士論文。
英文部分
1. Aaker, D. A. (1991). Managing brand equity, New York : The Free Press.
2. Aqueveque, C. (2006). “Extrinsic cues and perceived risk: the influence of consumption situation,”Journal of Consumer Marketing, 23,5-23
3. Bei, L.T., & Richard, W.(1999). “Product Knowledge and Product Involvement as Moderators of the Effects of Information on Purchase Decisions: A Case Study Using the Perfect Information Frontier Approach,” Journal of Consumer Affairs, 33(1),165-186.
4. Blair, M.E., & Innis, D. E. (1996). “The Effects of Product Knowledge on the Evaluation of Warranted Brands,” Psychology & Marketing, 13(5), 445-456.
5. Brucks, M., (1985).“ The Effects of Product Class Knowledge on Information Search Behavior,”Journal of Consumer Research, 12, 1-16.
6. Bettman, J.R., Johnson, E.J., & Payne, J.W. (1990). "A Componential Analysis of Cognitive Effort in Choice," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes ,45, 111-139.
7. Cordell, V. (1997). “Consumer Knowledge Measures as Predictors in Product Evaluation,” Psychology and Marketing, 14(3), 241-260.
8. Chang, T. Z., & Wildt, A. R. (1994). “Price, product information, and purchase intention: An empirical study,” Journal of Academy of Marketing Science, 22, 16-27
9. Cornelia, D., & René Y. D. (1987).“Associative Positioning Strategies through Comparative Advertising: Attribute versus Overall Similarity Approaches,” Journal of Marketing Research, 24, 377-388
10. Dawar, N., & Phillip P. (1994). “Marketing Universals: Consumers’ Use of Brand Name, Price, Physical Appearance, and Retailer Reputation as Signals of Product Quality,” Journal of Marketing, 58, 81-95.
11. Dick, A., Jain, A., & Richardson, P. (1996). “How consumers evaluate store brands,” Journal of Product and Brand Management, 5(2), 19-28
12. Devavrat, P., & Joydeep S. (2001).” Effect of Manufacturer Reputation, Retailer Reputation, and Product Warranty on Consumer Judgments of Product Quality: A Cue Diagnosticity Framework,” Journal of Consumer Psychology, 10, 123-134
13. Dodds et al.(1991). “The Effects of Price, Brand and Store Information on Buyers’ Product Evaluations,” Journal of Marketing Research, 28, 307-319.
14. Dodds, W.B.( 2002). “The Effects of Perceived and Objective Market Cues on Consumers` Product Evaluations,” Marketing Bulletin, 13,1-15.
15. Droge, C., & Darmon, R. Y. (1987). “Associative Positioning Strategies through Comparative Advertising：Attribute versus Overall Similarity Approaches,” Journal of Marketing Research, 24, 377-388
16. Estelami, H., Lehmann, D.R., & Golden, A.C. (2001). “Macro-economic determinants of consumer price knowledge: a meta-analysis of four decades of research” International Journal of Research in Marketing, 18(4), 341-55
17. Green P. E., & Srinivasan (1990). “Conjoint Analysis in Marketing: New Developments with Implications for Research and Practice,” Journal of Marketing, 3-17.
18. Green, P. E., & Srinivasan (1978). “Conjoint analysis in consumer research:Issues and outlook,” Journal of Consumer Research, 5,103-123.
19. Grewal, D. (1989).”The Effect of Intrinsie, Extrinsie Cues and Reference Prices on Buyers’ Perceptions of Quality and Value,” unpublished dissertation. Virginia Polyteehnic Insititute and State University
20. Herpen, E. V, & Pieters, F.G.M. (2007). “Anticipated identification costs: Improving assortment evaluation by diagnostic atrtributes,” International Journal of Research in Marketing, 24(1), 77-88
21. Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (1998).” Multivariate data analysis” (5th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson Education Inc
22. Hair, J. F., et al. (1995). Multivariate Data Analysis with Readings, 4th ed., N.Y. :Macmill- an.
23. Jacoby, J., & Jerry, C. O. (1977). “Consumer Response to Price: An Attitudinal, Information Processing Perspective,” in Moving Ahead with Attitude Research, Y. Wind and P. Greenberg, eds. Chicago: American Marketing Association, 73-86.
24. Johnson, E. J., & Russo, J. E. (1984). “Product Familiarity and Learning New Information,” Journal of Consumer Research, 11, 542-550
25. Keller, K. L., (1993). “Conceptualizing, measuring, and managing customer-based brand equity,” Journal of Marketing, 57(1), 1-22.
26. Lee, M., & Lou, Y. C. (1996). “Consumer Reliance on Intrinsic and Extrinsic Cues in Product Evaluations,”Journal of Applied Business Research, 12(1), 21-29.
27. Maheswaran, D. & Sternthal, B. (1990).“The Effects of Knowledge, Motivation,and Type of Message on Ad Processing and Product Judgments,” Journal of Consumer Research, 17,66-73
28. Mitchell, A. A. & Peter, F. D.(1996). “The Assessment of Alternative Measures of Consumer Expertise,” Journal of Consumer Research, 23, 219-240
29. Moreau, C. P., Lehmann, D. R., & Markman, A. B. (2001). “Entrenched knowledge structures and consumer response to new products,” Journal of Marketing Research, 38(1), 14-29
30. Teas, R. K., & Sanjeev A. (2000). “The Effects of Extrinsic Product Cues on Consumers’ Perceptions of Quality, Sacrifice, and Value,” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 28 (2), 278-290.
31. Rao, A. R., & Monroe, K. B. (1989), “The effect of price, brand name, and store name on buyers`,” Journal of Marketing Research, 26(3), 351-357.
32. Richardson, P. S., Alan S. D. & Jain A. K. (1994)”Extrinsic and Intrinsic Cue Effects on Perceptions of Store Brand Quality,” Journal of Marketing, 58(4), 28-36.
33. Park, W. C., Meryl P. G., & Vinod, K. T.﹙1988﹚,”Self-perceived Knowledge: Some Effects on Information Processing for a Choice Task,” “American Journal of Psychology”, 101, 401-424
34. Rao, A.R., & Monroe, K.B. (1988), “The moderating effect of prior knowledge on cue utilization in product evaluations,” Journal of Consumer Research, 15(2), 58-64
35. Petty, R. E., Cacioppo, J. T., & Schumann, D. (1983). “Central and Peripheral Routes to Advertising Effectiveness: The Moderating Role of Involvement,” Journal of Consumer Research, 10, 135-146
36. Park, W. C.,& Parker, V. L.﹙1981,”Familiarity and Its Impact on Consumer Decision Biases and Heuristics,”Journal of Consumer Research, 8, 223-230
37. Park, W. C., David, L. M., & Lawrence F.﹙1994﹚.”Consumer Knowledge Assessment,”Journal of Consumer Research, 21, 71-82
38. Philippe, C., & Wittink D. K.(1982).”Commercial Use of Conjoint Analysis: A Survey,” Journal of Marketing, 46, 44-53.
39. Schmidt, J. B., & Spreng, R. A. (1996). “A proposed model of external consumer information search,” Journal Greenvale,” 24(3), 246-256
40. Chen, S. F. S., Monroe, K. B., & Lou, Y. C. (1998）.” The effects of framing price promotion messages on consumers` perceptions and purchase intentions,” Journal of Retailing, 74(3), 353-372
41. Sujan, M. ( 1985). “Consumer knowledge: Effects on Evaluation Strategies Mediating Consumer Judgment,” Journal of Consumer Research, , 12, 31-46.
42. Teas, K. R., & Agarwal, S.﹙2000﹚.”The Effect of Extrinsic Product Cues on Consumers’ Perceptions of Quality, Sacrifice, and Value,” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 28(2), 278-290
43. Wyner, G. A.,(1992). “Uses and Limitations of Conjoint Analysis—Part I,”Marketing Research, 4, 42-44
44. Zeithaml, V.A., Berry, L.L., & Parasuraman, A. (1988). “Communcation and Control Processes In The Delivery Of Service,” Journal of Marketing, 52(2), 35-49. |
