English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 111316/142225 (78%)
Visitors : 48393899      Online Users : 707
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/39118


    Title: 政府採購法對國民中小學總務行政影響之研究
    Authors: 古如毓
    Contributors: 秦夢群
    古如毓
    Keywords: 政府採購
    總務行政
    國民中學
    國民小學
    Date: 2002
    Issue Date: 2010-04-25 14:55:15 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 本研究旨在探討我國政府採購法實施後對國民中小學總務行政影響之情形,並瞭解學校採購人員對影響國民中小學執行採購因素的看法上之差異情形,依統計分析結果進行綜合討論,以進一步對目前國民中小學總務行政執行政府採購法之相關缺失提出改善之道。
    本研究主要採用調查研究法,研究對象包括台北市、台北縣、桃園縣、新竹市、新竹縣等五縣市國民中小學之校長、會計、總務主任與事務組長為母群體,抽取1340學校採購人員為樣本,以自編之「政府採購法對國中小總務行政影響之調查問卷」進行問卷調查,有效問卷共計1173份。所得資料以SPSS 10.0 for Windows統計套裝軟體進行統計分析,並以t檢定與單因子變異數分析(one-way ANOVA)進行假設考驗。達顯著之研究假設則進一步以薛費法(Scheffé method)進行事後比較,以了解各組之差異情形。本研究之主要發現如下:
    一、就專業知能方面
    (一)男性採購人員對「專業知能」的要求程度明顯高於女性採購人員。
    (二)準備退休期(51歲以上)之採購人員對「專業知能」的要求程度顯著高於資深期(41-50歲)之採購人員。
    (三)「總務主任」對「專業知能」的要求程度明顯高於「會計主任」。
    (四)於民國88年8月1日前擔任總務工作職務者的採購人員對「專業知能」的要求程度顯著高於民國88年8月1日前沒有擔任總務工作職務者。
    (五)服務於城市之學校採購人員對「專業知能」的要求程度顯著高於偏遠地區之學校採購人員。
    (六)新竹市之學校採購人員對「專業知能」的要求程度顯著高於其他縣市之學校採購人員。
    二、就採購效率方面
    (一)於民國88年8月1日前擔任總務工作職務者的採購人員認為政府採購的「採購效率」高於民國88年8月1日前沒有擔任總務工作職務者的採購人員的看法。
    (二)學校規模為「27-35班」之採購人員認為政府採購的「採購效率」顯著高於「54-62班」之採購人員的看法。
    (三)新竹市之學校採購人員認為政府採購的「採購效率」明顯高於其他縣市之學校採購人員的看法。
    三、就採購公平性方面
    (一)男性採購人員認為政府採購的「採購公平性」顯著高於女性採購人員的看法。
    (二)「總務主任」認為政府採購的「採購公平性」顯著高於「會計主任」。
    (三)「師大、師院或教育學院」畢業者之採購人員認為政府採購的「採購公平性」顯著高於「研究所(含)以上」畢業者之採購人員的看法,同時也高於「一般大專院校」畢業者。
    (四)於民國88年8月1日前擔任總務工作職務者的採購人員認為政府採購的「採購公平性」顯著高於在民國88年8月1日前沒有擔任總務工作職務者的採購人員的看法。
    (五)新竹市之學校採購人員認為學校的「採購公平性」顯著高於其他縣市之學校採購人員的看法。
    四、就採購人員壓力方面
    (一)投入期與紮根期(31-41歲)之採購人員認為政府採購法實施後學校的「採購人員壓力」顯著高於資深期(41-50歲)採購人員的看法。
    (二)「總務主任」認為政府採購法實施後學校的「採購人員壓力」顯著高於「校長」、「會計主任」與「事務組長」的看法。
    (三)台北市之學校採購人員認為政府採購法實施後學校的「採購人員壓力」顯著高於台北縣之學校採購人員的看法。
    本研究依研究發現對主管機關、上級機關、學校採購人員與未來研究方向提出下列建議,以供參考:
    一、對主管機關的建議:
    (一)學校應增加專業採購人員的員額編制以避免由非相關專業人員來進行採購作業;
    (二)應統一培訓採購專業人員以避免縣市間採購人員專業知能上的差異;
    (三)應深入瞭解學校採購人員之實際需求並滿足它;
    (四)應提高學校採購人員的薪酬或減少其授課時數;
    (五)應將政府採購法納入大學教育行政課程或教師養成之相關課程中。
    二、對上級機關的建議:
    (一)應建立聯合發包中心以避免學校採購作業人力與物力之浪費;
    (二)應建構良好的資訊網站;
    (三)應建立縣內專業採購人員網絡。
    三、對學校採購人員的建議:
    (一)應積極參與各類研習活動以增進專業執行能力;
    (二)應暢通採購諮網絡以增進彼此意見交流;
    (三)應瞭解各種壓力調適的方法以調解採購執行過程的壓力。
    四、對未來研究的建議:
    (一)就研究對象方面,可將員額配置之變項納入背景變項進行分析;
    (二)就研究方法方面,可兼採質性研究以更深入瞭解問題;
    (三)就研究內容方面,可擴大影響採購作業相關因素之探討。
    The present study aims at the impact of the enforcement of the Government Procurement Law on the general & administrative affairs of junior high schools and primary schools. The study is intended to look into the school procurement officers’ viewpoints and the differences in factors related to the procurement of junior high schools and primary schools. Based on the outcome of the statistical analysis, it will launch a comprehensive discussion to further work out the correct actions against the shortcomings found in the enforcement of the Government Procurement Law by the schools’ general & administrative functions.
    The present study mainly adopts a survey study method aiming at the targets including the principals, accountants, heads of the general affairs and general affair sections in the junior high schools and primary schools in Taipei City, Taipei County, Taoyuan County and Hsinchu City and Hsinchu County, taking 1,340 school procurement officers as the samples. Using the “Questionnaire on the Influence of the General and Administrative Affairs in Junior High Schools and Primary Schools” compiled by the Researcher, the questionnaire survey was conducted to receive a total of 1,173 effective questionnaires which were analyzed through SPSS 10.0 for Windows software packages, further analyzed through t-test and one-way ANOVA for assumption and test. Those up to the significant research hypothesis were further taken into comparison through the Schefféémethod to look into various divergences.

    The study yielded the findings notably including the following:
    I. In terms of expertise:
    (I) Male procurement personnel are significantly higher than female counterparts in the demand of “expertise”.
    (II) The procurement personnel ready to retire (age over 51) are significantly higher than counterparts at senior ages (age 41~50) in the demand of “expertise”.
    (III) The “heads of general affairs” are significantly higher than the “heads of accounting” in the demand of “expertise”.
    (IV) The procurement personnel joining the general affairs before August 1, 1999 are significantly higher than the counterparts joining the general affairs after August 1, 1999 in the demand of “expertise”.
    (V) The procurement personnel serving in the urban areas are significantly higher than the counterparts serving in the rural areas in the demand of “expertise”.
    (VI) The procurement personnel serving in Hsinchu City are significantly higher than the counterparts serving elsewhere in the demand of “expertise”.

    II. In terms of procurement efficiency:
    (I) The procurement personnel joining the general affairs before August 1, 1999 are significantly higher than counterparts joining the general affairs after August 1, 1999 in the belief of the “procurement efficiency” by the government.
    (II) The procurement personnel serving in schools with the scale of “27-35 classes” are significantly higher than counterparts serving in schools with the scale of “54~62 classes” in the belief of the “procurement efficiency” by the government.
    (III) The procurement personnel serving in Hsinchu City are significantly higher than counterparts serving elsewhere in the belief of the “procurement efficiency” by the government.

    III. In terms of “impartial practice in procurement practice”:
    (I) Male procurement personnel are significantly higher than female counterparts in terms of the “impartiality in procurement” by the government.
    (II) The “heads of general affairs” are significantly higher than the “heads of accounting” in terms of the “impartiality in procurement” by the government.
    (III) The procurement personnel graduated from National Taiwan Normal University, Normal College or Educational College are significantly higher than the counterparts graduated from “Graduate School (inclusive) and higher institutions”, and higher than counterparts graduated from other general universities and colleges as well in terms of the “impartiality in procurement” by the government.
    (IV) The procurement personnel joining the general affairs before August 1, 1999 are significantly higher than counterparts joining the general affairs after August 1, 1999 in terms of the “impartiality in procurement” by the government.
    (V) The procurement personnel serving in Hsinchu City are significantly higher than the counterparts serving elsewhere in terms of the “impartiality in procurement” by the government.

    IV. In terms of pressure upon the procurement personnel:
    (I) The procurement personnel at rooting ages (age 31~41) are significantly higher than the counterparts at senior ages (age 41~50) in terms of the pressure of the procurement by the government.
    (II) The “heads of general affairs” are significantly higher than the “principals”, “heads of accounting” and “general affairs section chiefs” in terms of the pressure of the procurement by the government.
    (III) The procurement personnel serving in Taipei City are significantly higher than the counterparts serving in schools in Taipei County in terms of the pressure of the procurement by the government.

    Based on the findings yielded in the present study, proposals will be offered to the competent authorities of the government, superior authorities, the procurement personnel at schools as well as future researchers:

    I. Proposals to the competent authorities of the government:
    (I) That schools should staff themselves with more professional procurement personnel and should prevent assigning non-professionals to launch procurement;
    (II) That procurement professionals should be trained and groomed through package efforts to prevent the professional expertise deviation between those in urban and those in rural areas;
    (III) That they should make in-depth awareness of the substantial needs of the procurement personnel at school and try to satisfy them;
    (IV) That the remuneration should be raised, and the teaching hours should be reduced to procurement personnel at school; and
    (V) That the Government Procurement Law should be covered in the Educational Administration or Faculty Development Programs in universities.

    II. Proposals to superior authorities:
    (I) That a concerted contract awarding center should be established to prevent unnecessary waste in the resources and procurement personnel;
    (II) That sound information websites should be established; and
    (III) That professional procurement personnel websites should be established inside the county.

    III. Proposals to the procurement personnel at schools:
    (I) That the procurement personnel should vigorously participate in a variety of research and practice programs to enhance their expertise;
    (II) That they should set up barrier-free procurement information websites to enhance sound interchanges of their opinions;
    (III) That they should probe into the methods to soothe pressure so as to ease up pressure in the procurement process.

    IV. Proposals to the future researchers:
    (I) That they should put the variables in the personnel lineups into the background variables for analysis.
    (II) That in terms of research method, they should adopt qualitative studies to make possible more in-depth awareness of the issues; and
    (III) That in terms of the contents of study, they should expand the range of probes into the procurement related factors.
    Reference: 一、中文部分
    Chava Frankfort-Nachmias & David Nachmias原著,潘明宏譯(1998)。社會科學研究方法(上、下)。台北:韋伯文化事業出版社。
    D. Osborne & T. Gaebler原著。劉毓玲譯(1996)。新政府運動。台北市:天下文化。
    F. L. Lawrence , W. S. Wyrick, & J. S. Stepthen原著,項靖、陳儒晰、陳玉箴、李美馨譯(2002)。論文計劃與研究方法。台北縣:韋伯文化事業出版社。
    S. Edward原著,何瑞薇譯(2001)。全面品質教育。台北市:元照出版有限公司。
    王家通、曾燦燈(1988)。教育行政學-理論、研究與實際。高雄:復文圖書。
    王翠蘭(2002)。影響私立大學採購作業之因素研究。輔仁大學應用統計學研究所碩士論文,未出版。
    王鳳生(1998.05.04)。弊案何時了?。聯合晚報,第二版。
    王興昌(2001)。實施政府採購法之檢討:以桃園縣轄工程採購為例。中華大學建築與都市計畫學系碩士論文,未出版。
    丘昌泰(2000)。政策執行與評估。台北市:國立空中大學。
    朱敬先(1992)。健康心理學。台北市:五南圖書出版有限公司。
    江岷欽、劉坤億(1999)。企業型政府:理念、實務、省思。台北市:智勝文化出版有限公司。
    江鴻鈞(民84)。台灣省國民小學初任校長工作壓力與因應方式之研究。國立台中師範學院初等教育研究所碩士論文,未出版。
    行政院公共工程委員會(1999)。Agreement on Government Procurement。台北市:行政院公共工程委員會。
    行政院公共工程委員會(2003)。政府採購法令彙編(十二版二刷)。台北:行政院公共工程委員會。
    余民寧(1995)。心理與教育統計學。台北市 :三民書局。
    吳宗立(1996)。國中學校行政人員工作壓力與因應策略之研究。國教學報,8,99-131。
    吳俊瑩(2002)。國民小學總務主任學校營繕工程實務工作知能之研究。台南師範學院教師在職進修學校行政碩士學位班碩士論文,未出版。
    吳政達(2002)。教育政策分析:概念、方法與應用。台北市:高等教育文化事業有限公司。
    吳清山、林天祐(1994)。全面品質管理及其在教育上的應用。初等教育學刊,3,1-28。
    吳淑琪(2001)。雲嘉南地區國民中小學總務主任角色期望、角色踐行與工作滿意之研究。中正大學教育研究所碩士論文,未出版。
    吳錦隆(2001)。影響國中訓導主任工作壓力與工作適應相關因素之研究。國立彰化師範大學工業教育教學碩士在職進修專班碩士論文,未出版。
    李建中(1997)。政府採購法草案簡介。月旦法學雜誌,31,1-20。
    李豐光(1999)。我國政府採購人員教育訓練需求評估及實證調查之研究。東吳大學企業管理研究所碩士論文,未出版。
    周國華(1996)。中美日三國審計制度之比較。會計研究月刊,135,74-83。
    周肇熙(1999)。談政府採購法品質提昇。品質管制月刊,2,38-41。
    林天祐(1998a)。教育政策執行的變異現象研究。高雄:復文圖書。
    林天祐(1998b)。全面品質管理與學校行政革新。教育資料與研究,22,19-22。
    林水波(1999)。政府再造。台北市:智勝文化出版社。
    林昭男(2001)。國小初任主任工作壓力與因應策略之研究。國立高雄師範大學工業科技教育研究所碩士論文,未出版。
    林培州(1998)。歐聯政府的採購體制。經濟前瞻,11,64-67。
    林清江 (1981)。教育社會學新論。台北:五南圖書出版有限公司。
    林清波(1997)。政府採購法與提昇採購績效。營造天下,8,7-10。
    林慶隆(1997)。我國政府採購審計制度之研究。朝陽科技大學財務金融系所研究所碩士論文,未出版。
    唐國勝(2000)。政府採購法律應用篇。台北縣:永然文化出版股份有限公司。
    徐仁輝(1998)。公共財務管理。台北:智勝文化有限公司。
    秦夢群(1999)。教育行政:理論與實務部分。台北:五南圖書出版有限公司。
    高育麟(1997)。公務人員培訓與政府採購專業知識之運用。考銓月刊,10,62-77。
    張志明、劉淑娟(2000)。 知識管理在學校行政的應用:以總務處營繕工程為例。學校行政,6,71-84。
    張定富(2002)。政府採購法施行後國立大學校院採購人員業務認知與工作壓力之研究。屏東師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文,未出版。
    張阿良(1995)。學校營繕工程面面觀。師友,332,57-59。
    張素貞(1988)。扮演一個成功的總務主任。研習資訊,40,42-43。
    張鈿富(1995)。教育政策分析:理論與實務。台北:五南圖書出版有限公司。
    陳文雄(1999)。政府採購制度扮演的角色。營造天下,7,13-15。
    陳建良(1995)。英國政府採購制度之介紹-採購人員培訓與管理。中信通訊,10,18-24。
    陳振川(2000)。公共工程委員會處理政府採購爭議事件成效評估及修法事宜之研究。行政院公共工程委員會專案研究報告。
    美國政府採購商機說明會摘要。取自:http://www.trade.gov.tw/government/appendix_5.html。
    美國教育協會網站。http://www.nea.org。
    曾榮華(2000.07.02)。應用全面品質管理觀點提昇學校營繕工程品質。取自:http://www.nmh.gov.tw/edu/basis3/31/a13.html。
    曾吉雄(民88):國小教師參與開放教育之工作壓力及其因應策略研究。國立高雄師範大學工業科技教育學系碩士論文,未出版。
    湯志民(2000)。學校建築與校園規畫。台北市:五南圖書出版有限公司。
    黃國軒(2002)。我國高級職業學校總務主任職責、專業素養與專業態度之研究。彰化師範大學工業教育研究所碩士論文,未出版。
    黃鈺華(2000)。政府採購法解讀:逐條釋意。台北:元照出版有限公司。
    葉龍源(1998)。國民小學主任工作壓力與因應方式之研究。台中師範學院國民教育所碩士論文,未出版。
    詹政道、丁志仁、翁金珠、李慶安、劉承武、秦夢群、鄭同僚(2000)。「民代拿回扣了嗎?」座談會紀要。教育研究月刊,75,4-11。
    廖志祥(1998)。現行公共工程招標制度與採購法招標制度之比較研究。國立交通大學經營管理研究所碩士論文,未出版。
    廖炳雄(2001)。政府採購法實施對採購人員運作影響之研究。東海大學公共事務碩士學程在職進修專班碩士論文,未出版。
    劉順仁(2001)。政府會計整合型研究計劃:實施政府採購法對政府採購法行為影響之實證研究。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計劃成果報告。
    蔡先口(1995)。國民中學教師工作壓力和專業態度的關係及其相關因素之研究。國立臺灣師範大學輔導研究所碩士論文。
    蕭進益(2002)。基層採購發包事務及工程專業人員工作壓力之研究。東海大學公共事務碩士學程在職進修專班碩士論文,未出版。
    閻自安(1998)。全面品質管理在班級營上的應用。教育研究資訊,6(5),120-141。
    謝宗林(1998)。加拿大聯邦政府的採購政策與補償交易經驗挑戰。經濟前瞻,9,62-68。
    鍾永昌(2002)。台東縣學校採購人員業務認知與工作壓力之研究。台東師範學院教育研究所碩士論文,未出版。
    羅文基(1997)。從生涯理論論教師職級制度的推展,載于蔡培村主編教師生涯與職級制度(pp.1-26)。高雄:麗文文化有限公司。
    羅昌發(1997)。GATT/WTO與我國貿易。台北:永然文化出版股份有限公司。
    羅昌發(2000a)。政府採購法檢討與修訂之研究。行政院公共工程委員會專案研究計劃。
    羅昌發(2000b)。政府採購法與政府採購協定論析。台北:元照出版社。
    蘇淑華(2000)。政府採購法與圖書資料採購作業。國立成功大學圖書館館刊,5,1-14 。
    二、英文部分
    Arrow, J. K. ( 1951). Social choice and individual values. New York: Wiley.
    Candoli, I. C., Hack, W. G., & Ray, J. R.(1992). School business. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
    Crumrine, B., & Runnels, T. (1991). Total quality management in vocational technical education. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 340 846.)
    Darling-Hammond, L. (1997). Doing what matters most: Investing in Quality Teaching. New York: The National Commission on Teaching and America`s Future.
    Deming, W. E. (1986). Out of crisis. Massachusetts: MIT.
    Dewe, P. J. (1986). An investigation into the causes and consequences of teacher stress. New Zealand Journal of Educational Studies, 21(2), 145-147.
    Drake, T. L., & Roe, W. H. (1994). School business management. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon
    Dunn, W. N. (1994). Public policy analysis: An introduction(2nd.ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
    Econman (2000.11.24).交易定理。取自:http://econman.uhome.net/A-level/Exchange/Exchange(2).htm
    Friedrich, J. C.(1963). Man and his government: An empirical theory of politics. New York: McGraw-Hill .
    Gordon, W. (1996). Corruption and the transition from socialism in China. Journal of Law and Society, 23(1), 149-169.
    Grumm, J. G. (1975). The analysis of policy impact. In F.I. Greenstien & N. W. Polsby (Eds.), Handbook of political science(pp.426-444). Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley Pub. Co.
    Jackson, H. J. (1980). The birth of the GATT-MTN system: A Constitutional Appraisal. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes Publishing Co.
    Jones, T., & Rober, A.(1996). The politics and economics of the European Union. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
    Kano, N.(1993). A perspective on quality activities in American firms. California Management Review, 35(3), 31-37.
    Lasswell, H. D., & Kaplan, A.(1965). Power and society: A framework of political inquiry. New Haven: Yale University Press.
    Liberman, M. (1956).Education as profession. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
    Moracco, J. C., & Mcfadden, H. (1982). The counselor`s role in reducing teacher stress. The Personnel and Guidance Journal, 5, 549-552.
    Moravcsik, A. (1993). Preferences and Power in the European Community: A Liberal Intergovernmentalist Approach. Journal of Common Market Studies, 31 (4), 473-524.
    Pescatore, P., & William, J. D., & Lowenfeld, A. F.(1994). Handbook of GATT dispute settlement. USA: Transnational Juris Publications.
    Shanker, A. (1985). In support of teachers: The making of a profession. NASSP Bulletin, 69(482), 93.
    Sweeney, P. D., & McFarlin, D. B. (1997). Process and outcome: Gender differences in the assessment of justice. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 18, 83-98.
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    學校行政碩士在職專班
    89911021
    91
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0089911021
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[學校行政碩士在職專班] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    91102101.pdf15KbAdobe PDF2609View/Open
    91102102.pdf19KbAdobe PDF2826View/Open
    91102103.pdf31KbAdobe PDF21148View/Open
    91102104.pdf44KbAdobe PDF2672View/Open
    91102105.pdf159KbAdobe PDF2969View/Open
    91102106.pdf59KbAdobe PDF21437View/Open
    91102107.pdf552KbAdobe PDF22123View/Open
    91102108.pdf75KbAdobe PDF2922View/Open
    91102109.pdf992KbAdobe PDF2878View/Open
    91102110.pdf101KbAdobe PDF21510View/Open
    91102111.pdf70KbAdobe PDF21143View/Open
    91102112.pdf73KbAdobe PDF21060View/Open
    91102113.pdf155KbAdobe PDF2922View/Open
    91102114.pdf286KbAdobe PDF21541View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback