Loading...
|
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/51163
|
| Title: | 臺灣政論節目中的政治意識型態之社會語用學研究
Political ideology in Taiwan political talk shows: a sociopragmatic analysis |
| Authors: | 游惠鈞
Yu, Hui-jyun |
| Contributors: | 詹惠珍
Chan, Hui-chen
游惠鈞
Yu, Hui-jyun |
| Keywords: | 言語行為理論
意識型態
政論節目
Speech Act Theory
ideology
political talk show |
| Date: | 2010 |
| Issue Date: | 2011-10-05 14:25:52 (UTC+8) |
| Abstract: | 本論文藉由檢視臺灣政論節目中所使用的語用策略（直接或間接）、語言行為類別、及語言行為目的，探討政治意識型態對於語言行為產生的影響。本研究以Grice（1975）的合作原則與Searle（1969）的語言行為理論作為分析框架，並以Leech（1983）的禮貌原則解釋語用策略及語言行為在不同政論節目中的分布差異。
本研究從臺灣主流的政論節目當中，政治光譜兩極的政論節目「大話新聞」（泛綠）與「2100全民開講」（泛藍）採集語料；並以Searle（1965年）的語言行為理論進行分析，總共識別12類直接語言行為和26類間接語言行為。
研究結果顯示，（一）語用策略方面，說話者在政論節目中使用間接語言行為的頻率比直接語言行為頻繁。（二）語言行為類別方面，直接語言行為中，排序則為：斷言（Assertive）、表述（Expressive）、指示（Directive）；而間接語言行為中，各類別使用頻率由高至低排序為：表述（Expressive）、斷言（Assertive）、指示（Directive）。（三）在政治意識型態的影響方面，支持執政黨的政論節目行使較多「直接且事實導向」的語言行為，而支持反對黨的政論節目則有較多的「間接且評論導向」的語言行為。（四）「譴責」是政論節中最常使用的語言行為，並且以間接方式表達居多。（五）推論過程中，推論步驟較多的「間接譴責」語言行為在政論節目中較常被使用。（六）「大話新聞」與「2100全民開講」雖偏向不同的政治意識型態，但是它們皆以斷言類（Assertive）或指示類（Directive）的語言行為來包裝，藉以間接達到「譴責」執政黨疏失的目的。
This thesis investigates the political-ideological influence on speech acts in Taiwan political talk shows by examining the pragmatic strategies (directness and indirectness), the speech act categories, and the illocutionary purposes performed in the talk shows. In this thesis, Gricean maxims (1975) and Searle’s theory of speech acts (1969) are adopted as the analytic frames to study how speech acts are conducted, and Leech’s (1983) notions of politeness are the theoretical basis for explaining the distributional difference of pragmatic strategies.
The data analyzed in this study is composed of dialogues extracted from 6 episodes of two political talk shows with opposite stances on political issues, namely DaHuaXingWen (大話新聞), the pan-green talk show, and QuanMinKaiJiang (2100全民開講), the pan-blue one. Following Searle’s scheme of speech acts (1965), this study identifies the illocutionary act of every clause in the data and recognizes 12 types of direct speech acts and 26 types of indirect speech acts in the collected data.
The results of quantitative analysis show that, (1) indirect speech act is generally performed more frequently than indirect speech act in political talk shows. (2) The order of frequency in direct speech acts represents as: Assertive > Expressive > Directive; and in indirect speech acts, the order of frequency is: Expressive > Assertive > Directive. (3) In terms of the political-ideological influence, the political talks show supporting the ruling party (QuanMinKaiJiang) performs direct fact-orientated speech acts more, while the show that standing in the opposition to the ruling party (DaHuaXingWen) has more indirect opinion-oriented speech acts. (4) Condemnation is the most often used illocutionary act in political talk shows, and mainly done indirectly. (5) Indirect condemnations with longer length of inferential process are preferred in political talk shows. (6) Despite that DaHuaXingWen and QuanMinKaiJiang held different political stance, they share the same pattern of expressing indirect condemnation—wrapping it in speech acts of Assertives or Directives. |
| Reference: | Austin, J. L. (1962). How to do things with words. Cambridge : Harvard University Press.
Barthes, R. (1973). Mythologies, London: Paladin Books.
Brown, P., & Levinson, S.C. (1978). Politeness: Some universals in language use. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
Chang, C.-C., & Lo, H.-V. (2007). Zhuī qiú zhī shì, rèn tóng huò yú lè? zhèng lùn xìng tán huà jié mù de nèi róng yŭ yuè tīng zhòng shōu shì dòng jī de tàn tăo [The pursuit of knowledge, identification or entertainment? an exploration of political call-in program content and audiences` viewing motives]. Xin Wen Xue Yan Jiu [Mass Communication Research], 93: 83-139.
Chang, C.-C., & Lo, H.-V. (2009). Zhèng lùn xìng tán huà jié mù yǐng xiăng zhī tàn tăo [The influence of political call-in programs]. Xin Wen Xue Yan Jiu [Mass Communication Research], 98: 47-91.
Du Bois, John W., Stephan Schuetze-Coburn, Susanna Cumming and Danae Paolino. (1993). Outline of discourse transcription. In Jane A. Edwards and Martin D. Lampert (ed.), Talking data: Transcription and coding methods for discourse research. (pp. 45-89). Hillsdale. NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Eagleton, T. (1991). Ideology: An Introduction. London: Verso.
Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In Cole, P. & Morgan, J. (ed.), Syntax and Semantics, 3: Speech Acts. (pp. 41-58). New York: Academic Press.
Hawkes, D. (2003). Ideology (2nd ed.). USA and Canada: Routledge.
Kuo, S. (2001). Is there only one china?: Analyzing the rhetoric of chinese nationalism in a newspaper article. Journal of Asian Pacific Communication, 11(2), 287-303.
Kuo, S., & Nakamura, M. (2005). Translation or transformation? A case study of language and ideology in the taiwanese press. Discourse & Society: An International Journal for the Study of Discourse and Communication in their Social, Political and Cultural Contexts, 16(3), 393-417.
Lakoff, R. (1973). The logic of politeness: or minding your p’s and q’s. In Proceedings of the ninth regional meeting of the Chicago linguistic society (pp. 292-305). Chicago: Department of Linguistics University of Chicago.
Lakoff, R. (1975). Language and woman’s place. New York: Harper and Row.
Lakoff, R. (1977). What you can do with words: Politeness, pragmatics and performatives. In Rogers, A., Wall, B. & Murphy, J. P. (eds.), Proceedings of the Texas conference on performances, presuppositions and implicatures (pp. 79-105). Washington: Center for Applied Linguistics.
Lay, J.G., Yap K.H., & Chen Y.W. (2008). The Transition of Taiwan`s Political Geography, Asian Survey, 48(5): 773–793.
Leach, R. (1993). Political ideologies: An Australian introduction (2nd ed.). South Melbourne: Macmillan Education Australia.
Leech, G. (1983). Principles of Pragmatics, London: Longman
Macridis, R. C., & Hulliung, M. L. (1996). Contemporary political ideologies: Movements and regimes. New York: Harper Collins College Publishers.
Mannheim, K. (1936). Ideology and Utopia. London: Routledge.
McLellan, D. (1995). Ideology. United States: University of Minnesota Press.
Roucek, J. S. (1944). A history of the concept of ideology. Journal of the history of ideas, 5(4), 479-88.
Sargent, L. T. (2006). Contemporary political ideologies: A comparative analysis (13th ed.). Illinois : The Dorsey Press.
Searle, J. R. (1965). What is a speech act? In Davis, S. (ed.), Pragmatics: A reader (pp. 254-264). Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.
Searle, J. R. (1969). Speech Acts: An essay in the philosophy of language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Searle, J. R. (1975). Indirect speech acts. In Davis, S (ed.), Pragmatics: A reader (pp. 265-277). Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.
Searle, J. R. (1979). Expression and meaning: Studies in the theory of speech acts. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University.
Thompson, J. B. (1990). Ideology and modern culture: critical social theory in the era of mass communication. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
van Dijk, T. A. (1985). Structures of news in the press. In T. A. van Dijk (Ed.), Discourse and communication: New approaches to the analysis of mass media discourse and communication (pp. 69-93). Berlin and New York: Walter de Gruyter.
van Dijk, T. A. (2007). Ideology and discourse analysis. In M. Freeden (Ed.), The meaning of ideology: Cross-disciplinary perspectives (pp. 110-35). USA and Canada: Routledge.
Wang, C. (1996). A pragmatic analysis of the political attitudes in Chinese newspapers. M.A. thesis. National Kaohsiung Normal University.
Wu, N. (1995). Shehui fenshi han zhengdang jingzheng: Jieshi guomindang weihe jixü zhizheng” [Social cleavages and political competition: Why is there no “stunt election” in Taiwan?], in Zhongyangyanjiuyuan minzuxüe janjiusuo jikan [Bulletin of the Institute of Ethnology, Academia Sinica] 78, 101–30. |
| Description: | 碩士
國立政治大學
語言學研究所
96555001
99 |
| Source URI: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0965550011 |
| Data Type: | thesis |
| Appears in Collections: | [語言學研究所] 學位論文
|
Files in This Item:
| File |
Size | Format | |
|---|
| 001101.pdf | 4889Kb | Adobe PDF2 | 1516 | View/Open |
|
All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.
|
