English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 110944/141864 (78%)
Visitors : 47860125      Online Users : 714
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/65448


    Title: 論道安從格義到尋章察句的的轉變
    Other Titles: From Geyi to Xun Zhang Cha Ju: Dao-An`s Change of Method in Sutra Interpretation
    Authors: 涂艷秋
    Tu, Yen-chiu
    Contributors: 中文系
    Keywords: 道安;格義;尋章察句
    Dao An;geyi;xun zhang cha ju
    Date: 2010.06
    Issue Date: 2014-04-17 11:29:26 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 道安時代所謂的「格義」,本是以中國固有的思想來理解佛教名相的一種方法,道安年輕時曾一度戮力於格義的學習,後來公開反對格義,這當中變化的原因何在?當時所謂的「格義」究竟是譯經的方法,還是現解佛經的方法? 拋開了格義之後,道安用什麼方法來理解經中大義?作者觀察現存的《人本欲生經注》後,發現道安改採「尋章察句」的方式來進行探討,然而何謂「尋章察句」?它的具體內容爲何?本文依據《人本欲生經注》做了詳細的說明。
    This study examines the Venerable Dao An`s opposition to geyi (格義). Geyi was originally a tool employed to comprehend Buddhism in terms of Chinese traditional thought. As a youth, Dao An studied geyi diligently, but later in life he rejected it openly. Why? Did Dao An see the limit of geyi and find another way to Buddhism when he decided to put it aside? Firstly, this study sets out to explore the background on which Dao An came into contact with geyi. It reveals that Dao An derived his idea of geyi from Zhu Fa-Ya. Some contemporary scholars hold that geyi brought about the conflation of Lao-Zhuang Daoism with the Pâramita Sutra. So, then what classical works did Dao An and Zhu Fa-Ya master under the influence of Fotudeng? What were the most popular works in Northern China? Was it truly the Pâramita Sutra? Did Dao An intend to solve the problems in the Pâramita Sutra when he decided to study geyi in his early days? Secondly, Was Dao An`s rejection of geyi of his own realization or was he influenced by others? What were the internal and external influences that led to this rejection? What theories influenced him sufficiently to lead him to give up the conventional approach to sutra interpretation? What was his new approach to sutra interpretation? Can we find any evidence in extant documents? These are the main concerns of this study.
    Relation: 臺大中文學報, No.32
    Data Type: article
    DOI link: http://dx.doi.org/10.6281/NTUCL.2010.32.04
    DOI: 10.6281/NTUCL.2010.32.04
    Appears in Collections:[Department of Chinese Literature] Periodical Articles

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    201012170011-119-165.pdf3900KbAdobe PDF2723View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback