English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 111321/142230 (78%)
Visitors : 48399215      Online Users : 887
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    政大機構典藏 > 商學院 > 企業管理學系 > 學位論文 >  Item 140.119/67454
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/67454


    Title: 資訊透明度與企業價值之關聯性 -台灣市場之實證
    The effects of Information Transparency on Corporate Value -An Empirical Evidence in Taiwan
    Authors: 詹涵宇
    Contributors: 吳啟銘
    詹涵宇
    Keywords: 資訊透明度
    分析師盈餘預測
    企業價值
    Information Transparency
    Analysts’ earnings forecasts
    Corporate value
    Date: 2013
    Issue Date: 2014-07-14 11:26:13 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 歷經國內外多起知名企業的財務弊案後,各國政府及投資人開始關注公司的資訊透明度,企業也意識到資訊透明度對於企業永續經營的重要性,因此,本研究主要探討資訊透明度對於企業價值之影響。研究貢獻在於以具有專業和分析能力之分析師預測行為作為判斷企業資訊透明度之依據,進而探究其與企業價值之關聯性。本研究以2008年到2013年台灣上市(櫃)公司為樣本,以企業價值(Tobin’s Q)為應變數,資訊透明度相關之變數(分析師追蹤意願、分析師盈餘預測偏誤與分析師盈餘預測離散性)為主要解釋變數,在控制公司成長面、獲利面、風險面與公司規模因素,並固定產業和年份,利用追蹤資料迴歸模型(panel regression)來進行分析。
    實證結果分為兩部分,(1)代表資訊透明度之變數-分析師預測意願、分析師預測精準度及分析師預測離散性與企業價值具有顯著正向關係。另利用前述之結果,本研究自行建立一個衡量企業透明度的模型,以整合性資訊探討資訊透明度對於企業價值的影響,實證結果顯示(2)資訊透明度與企業價值間確實具有顯著正向關係,結果支持良好的資訊透明度,有助於公司治理,長期間更能夠提升企業價值與永續經營。此外,本研究以整合資訊衡量企業資訊透明度,相較於單一資訊更為完善,也提供企業利害關係人及一般大眾不同面相去了解企業的資訊透明度,進而保護其權益。
    Since the occurrences of financial scandal, issues surrounding corporate governance and information disclosure have been widely discussed in these few years. Not only have government and investors started paying more attention on information transparency, but more and more firms have noticed that well corporate governance could help its sustainable development. The main purpose of this study is to examine the influences of information transparency on corporate value. Based on the samples of Taiwan listed firms for the period from 2009 to 2013, this study employs panel regression model with Corporate value (Tobin’s Q) as the dependent variable against various combinations of explanatory variables (analysts following, analysts’ earnings forecast bias and analysts’ earnings forecast derivation).
    The results of this research reveal that (1) the firms with high corporate value significantly have more analysts following, less analyst`s earning forecast error and the greater forecast derivation. And by using an integrated model to do further analysis, the evidence shows that (2) higher information transparency could improve the corporate governance, gain more corporate value and benefit sustainable development in the long term. What’s more, instead of unitary source, this research measures corporate information transparency via integrated sources to ensure credibility, and provides various angles for corporate stakeholders and the general public to learn further more about corporate information transparency and be able to protect their rights.
    Reference: 一、 外文文獻
    Akerlof, G. (1970). The Market for Lemons: Quality Uncertainty and the Market Mechanism. Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 84, pp. 488-500.
    Beaver, W. (1998.). Financial Reporting: An Accounting Revolution (3rd ed.). New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
    Botosan, C. A. (1997). Disclosure Level and the Cost of Equity Capital. The Accounting Review Vol.72, No3, pp. 323-349.
    Botosan, C. and Plumlee, M. (2002). A re-examination of disclosure level and the expected cost of equity capital. Journal of Accounting Research 40, pp. 21-40.
    Brown, L. D. and R. L. Hagerman. (1987). Security analyst superiority relative to univariate time-series models in forecasting quarterly earnings. Journal of Accounting Economics 9 (1), pp. 61-87.
    Byard, D. K. (2002). Corporate Disclosure Quality and Properties of Analysts’ Information Environment. SSRN.
    Francis, J., and D. Philbrick. (1993). Analysts’ decisions as products of a multi-task environmen. Journal of Accounting Research 31 (2), pp. 216-230.
    French, Kenneth R. and Richard Roll. (1986). Stock return variances: The arrival of information and the reactions of traders. Journal of Financial Economics 17:, pp. 5-26.
    Glosten, Lawrence R. and Paul R. Milgrom. (1985). Bid, ask and transaction prices in a specialist market with heterogeneously informed traders. Journal of Financial Economics 14, pp. 71-100.
    Hansen, R., and A. Sarin. (1998). Are analysts overoptimistic around seasoned equity offerings? Working paper. Santa Clara University.
    Healy, P. M., A. P. Hutton, and K. G. Palepu. (1999). Stock performance and intermediation changes surrounding sustained increase in disclosure. ontemporary Accounting Research 16 (3), pp. 485-520.
    Healy, Paul M. and Krishna G. Palepu. (2001). Information Asymmetry , Corporate Disclosure, and the Capital Markets: A Review of the Empirical Disclosure Literature. Journal of Accounting and Economics 30, p. 405~440.
    Herrmann, D. R., O. K. Hope, and W. B. Thomas. (2008). International diversification and forecast optimism: The effects of Reg FD. Accounting Horizons 22 (2), pp. 179-197.
    Jennings, R. (1987). Unsystematic security price movements, managerial earnings forecast, and revisions in consensus analyst earnings forecasts. Journal of Accounting Research 25 (1), pp. 90-110.
    Jensen, M. C., and W. H. Meckling. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics 3 (4), pp. 305-360.
    Lang, M. H., and R. J. Lundholm. (1996). Corporate disclosure policy and analyst behavior. The Accounting Review 71 (4), pp. 467-492.
    Mahoney, W. F. (1991). Investor Relations: The Professional’s Guide to Financial Marketing and Communications (1st ed.). New York, NY: New York Institute of Finance.
    Pound, J. (1988). Proxy Contests and the Efficiency of Shareholder Oversight. Journal of Financial Economics 20, pp. 237-265.
    R., V. (2001). Essays on disclosure. Journal of Accounting and Economics 32 (1-3), pp. 97–180.
    Sengupta, P. (1998). Corporate disclosure quality and the cost of debt. The Accounting Review 73, pp. 459-474.
    Shaw, K. (2001). The impact of accounting rules on IPO prices: the case of research and development cost capitalization. Journal of Accounting and Business Research, Vol. 8 (2), pp. 21-39.
    Waymire, G. (1986). Additional evidence on the accuracy of analyst forecasts before and after voluntary management earnings forecast. The Accounting Review 61 (1), pp. 129-142.

    二、 中文文獻
    王韶濱與胡雅惠. (2010). 資訊透明度與市場反應之關聯性研究. 國立中興大學會計學系.
    王韶濱與許明曄. (2011). 資訊透明度與財務分析師預測行為. 當代會計,第12卷第2期, 頁 119-124.
    后祥雯. (2004). 證券分析師在財務預測資訊中所應扮演的積極角色與功能發揮. 證券櫃檯月刊,第 97期, 頁 34-47.
    江向才、何里仁. (2003). 公司治理之資訊透明度與經營績效關聯性之實證研究. 管理會計,第63 期, 頁 1-20.
    何里仁. (2003). 公司治理之資訊透明度與績效評核關聯性之研究,. 逢甲大學會計與財稅研究所未出版碩士論文 (頁 27-36). 逢甲大學會計與財稅研究所.
    吳安妮. (1993). 財務分析師、管理當局及統計模式預測準確度之比較研究. 管理評論,第 12卷, 頁 1-48.
    李沛原. (2006). 券商分析師樂觀盈餘預測與利益衝突. 逢甲大學財務金融學系碩士班未出版碩士論文 (頁 8-30). 逢甲大學財務金融學系.
    李幃宗. (2008). 資訊透明度、公司治理對公司經營績效之探討. 長庚大學企業研究所未出版碩士論文 (頁 22-29). 長庚大學企業研究所.
    沈宜慶. (2002). 企業資訊透明度與債券發行資金成本關係之實證研究. 淡江大學會計學系未出版碩士論文. 淡江大學會計學系.
    周建宏. (2002). 提高資訊透明度以因應全球化的資本市場. 會計研究月刊,200(7), 頁 78-87.
    周建新與林宗得. (2005). 資訊透明度對企業價值增額解釋能力之研究. 會計與公司治理,第2卷第2期, 頁 28-32.
    林日峰. (2002). 企業價值的實現須透過對外的透明. 會計研究月刊,200(7), 頁 64-65.
    林欣怡. (2003). 公司資訊透明度權益資金成本之關係探討. 中山大學財管系未出版碩士論文. 中山大學財管系.
    林嬋娟與林囿成. (2002). 由安隆案看分析師過度樂觀預測之後果. 會計研究月刊,第 197期, 頁 20-25.
    邱碧珠. (2000). 資訊揭露程度與權益資金成本之關係:我國資訊電子業之關係. 國立台灣大學會計學研究所未出版碩士論文. 國立台灣大學會計學研究所.
    柯承恩. (2003). 企業領導與公司治理. 商業周刊,835期, 156-157.
    馬淑華. (2004). 龔照勝:推動公司治理 企業是核心引擎. 經濟日報,A7 版,第二屆台北公司治理論壇綜合報導.
    張文瀞、周玲臺與林修葳. (2003). 內部人持股連續變動公司之盈餘管理行為特性. 會計評論,第37 期, 頁 53-83.
    張瑞當與方俊儒. (2006). 資訊揭露評鑑系統對企業盈餘管理行為之影響. 會計評論,第 42 期, 頁 1-22.
    許秀賓. (1993). 財務分析師盈餘預測優越性決定因素-實證研究. 會計評論,第 27期, 頁 137-158.
    陳冠宙、陳育成與陳雪如. (2005). 影響上市公司網站資訊透明度因子之實證. 會計與公司治理,第2 卷第1 期, 頁 33-59.
    陳瑞斌、許崇源與翁慈青. (2007). 公司治理架構與財務報告透明度之關聯性研究. 中華管理評論國際學報,第10卷第1期, 頁 11-17.
    陳瑞斌與許崇源. (2008). 資訊揭露水準對於權益資金成本之影響. 東吳經濟商學學報,第61期, 頁 67-108.
    陳樹. (2002). 我國企業盈餘操縱問題之誘因、影響與因應對策. 當代會計,第3卷第2期, 頁 231-242.
    程心瑤與蔡宜芬. (2006). 分析師預測與管理當局預測對於企業評價之相對有用性:發佈時機與先後順序. 會計評論,第 42 期, 頁 81-107.
    黃卲彥、吳東憲與紀怡如. (2009). 企業網站環境會計資訊揭露影響因素之研究. 會計與公司治理,第 6 卷第 1期, 頁 1-30.
    葉銀華. (2002). 從台灣上市公司網站資訊揭露透明度. 會計研究月刊,第200 期, 頁 70-77.
    劉倩妏. (2004). 以投資人關係為目的資訊揭露. 國立中山大學企業管理研究所碩士論文. 國立中山大學企業管理研究所.
    鄭丁旺. (2002). 美國恩龍公司事件對投資人信心與金融產業之衝擊. 中華會計教育學會季刊.
    謝淑旦、李合龍與李寶桂. (2010). 資訊揭露評等對企業價值之影響. 遠東學報,第27卷第 2期, 頁 213-228.
    顏信輝與吳晉誠. (2005). 法人說明會與公司治理變數對分析師盈餘預測影響之研究. 私立淡江大學會計學研究所未出版論文. 私立淡江大學會計學研究所.
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    企業管理研究所
    101355040
    102
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0101355040
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[企業管理學系] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    504001.pdf1000KbAdobe PDF2132View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback