English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 110119/141062 (78%)
Visitors : 46509016      Online Users : 491
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    政大機構典藏 > 商學院 > 企業管理學系 > 學位論文 >  Item 140.119/94390
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/94390


    Title: 品牌形象與客觀品質之關係探討-以台灣市場為例
    Brand Image - Objective Quality Relationship In The Taiwan Market
    Authors: 袁偉軒
    Yuan, Wei-Hsuan
    Contributors: 樓永堅
    Lou, Yung-Chien
    袁偉軒
    Yuan, Wei-Hsuan
    Keywords: 消費者報導
    品牌形象
    客觀品質
    consumer report
    brand image
    objective quality
    Date: 2006
    Issue Date: 2016-05-06 16:34:26 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 「品牌形象好的產品,其產品品質也會比較好」的想法,是許多消費者在購物時所依賴的經驗法則。然而,在現今的消費市場,品牌形象是否真能反映出品質的高低?本研究採用民國79年1月至民國94年6月份的「中國民國消費者報導」,探討在16年間,98個產品類別中,品牌形象與產品品質的相關性。
    研究結果顯示,品牌形象不能做為產品品質的訊號,在98個產品項中,兩者的相關平均值為-0.14728,並且在各個產品項內,兩者相關性呈現大幅的差異。同時,在研究影響品牌形象與產品品質的中介變數後,本研究發現,在台灣消費市場,相較於開發中國家的產品,已開發國家的產品的品牌形象與產品品質相關性較高;而本研究的另外兩項中介變數:「耐久品/非耐久品」以及「搜尋品/經驗品」,並不能顯著地解釋品牌形象與產品品質相關性的差異。
    根據本研究的分析,未來消費者在購買產品時,必須蒐集更多的產品相關資訊以促進購買決策的正確性,而不能單以品牌形象作為最終購買決策的依據。
    It seems that “better brand image implies higher quality” is the rule of thumb. However, is it true in the consumption market nowadays? This thesis uses 98 product category test results of the Chinese, Taipei Consumer Report from the period of January 1990 to June 2005 to examine the relationship between brand image and quality.

    The results of this thesis indicate that brand image is not a good signal of quality. The correlation coefficient is -0.14728 in average and greatly varying levels of correlation across 98 product category. At the same time, after investigating the variables, this thesis finds out that comparing to the product from developing countries, those from developed countries have higher brand image- quality correlation levels. Besides, other two variables, “durable/non-durable goods” and “search/experience goods”, do not significantly influence the correlation levels.

    According to the analysis, consumers need to collect more product-related information before final purchase decisions, instead of depending on brand image solely.
    Reference: 【中文部分】
    1. 李伯謙、周善謙(2004) 譯,「行銷管理概論」,台灣培生教育出版股份有限公司。
    2. 張香玉(2005),「價格與品質關係之探討-以台灣市場為例」,國立政治大學企業管理研究所未出版碩士論文。
















    【英文部分】
    1. Aaker, David. (1996), Building Strong Brand, New York: The Free Press.
    2. Ambler, Tim (1997), “Do Brands Benefit Consumers?” International Journal of Advertising, Vol. 16, Iss. 3, pp. 167.
    3. Biel, Alexander L. (1992), “How Brand Image Drives Brand Equity,” Journal of Advertising Research, Vol. 32, Iss. 6, pp. 67.
    4. Daniels, John D., Lee H. Radebaugh and Peter D. Sullivan (2001), International Business: Environments and Operations, Tenth Edition, New Jersey: Pearson Education International.
    5. Devaraj, Sarv, Khalil F. Matta and Edward Conlon. (2001), “Product and Service Quality: The Antecedents of Customer Loyalty in the Automotive Industry,” Production and Operations Management, Vol. 10, Iss. 4; pp. 424.
    6. Dobni, Dawn and G.eorge M. Zinkhan (1990), “In Search of Brand Image: A Foundation Analysis,” Advances in Consumer Research, Vol. 17, pp.110-119.
    7. Dodds, William. B., Kent B. Monroe and Dhruv Grewal (1991), “Effects of Price, Brand, and Store Information on Buyers` Product Evaluations,” Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 28, Iss. 3; pp. 307.
    8. Friedman, Monroe P. (1967), “Quality and Price Considerations in Rational Consumer Decision Making,” Journal of Consumer Affairs, Vol. 1, Iss.1, pp. 13-23.
    9. Grewal, Dhruv, R Krishnan, Julie Baker and Norm Borin (1998), “The Effect of Store Name, Brand Name and Price Discounts on Consumers` Evaluations and Purchase Intentions,” Journal of Retailing, Vol. 74, Iss. 3; pp. 331.
    10. Hill, Charles L. and Gareth R. Jones (2004), Strategic Management Theory: An Integrated Approach, Sixth Edition, Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
    11. Holbrook, Kelvin B. and Kim P. Corfman (1983), “Quality and Other Types of Value in the Consumption and Experience: Phaedrus Rides Again,” In Jacoby, J. and Olson, J.C. (eds), Perceived Quality: How Consumers View Stores and Merchandise, pp. 31-57. Lexington, MA: D.C. Heath.
    12. Keller, Kevin Lane. (1993), “Conceptualizing, Measuring and Managing Customer-based Brand Equity,” Journal of Marketing, Vol. 57, pp. 1-22.
    13. Khanna, Samiha R. (1986), “Asia Companies and the Country Stereotype Paradox: An Empirical Study,” Columbia Journal of World Business, Vol. 23, Iss. 2, pp. 29-38.
    14. Kirmani, Amna and Akshay R. Rao (2000), "No Pain, No Gain: A Critical Review of the Literature on Signaling Unobservable Product Quality," Journal of Marketing, Vol. 64, pp. 66-79.
    15. Kolbe, Richard H., and Melissa S. Burnett (1991), “Content-Analysis Research: An Examination of Applications with Directives for Improving Research Reliability and Objectivity,” Journal of Consumer Research, Vol.18, Iss.2, pp. 243-250.
    16. Kotler, Philip. (1999), “Kotler on Marketing : How to Create, Win, and Dominate Markets, New York: Free Press.
    17. Lombard, Matthew, Jennifer Snyder-Duch and Cheryl C. Bracken. (2002), “Content Analysis in Mass Communication: Assessment and Reporting of Intercoder Reliability,” Human Communication Research,Vol.28, Iss.4, pp. 587-604.
    18. Miyazaki, Anthony D., Dhruv Grewal and Ronald C. Goodstein. (2005), “The Effect of Multiple Extrinsic Cues on Quality Perceptions: A Matter of Consistency,” Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 32, Iss. 1; pp. 146-154.
    19. Nelson, Philip (1970), “Information and Consumer Behavior,” Journal of Political Economy, Vol.78, Iss.2, pp. 311-329.
    20. Oxenfeldt, Alfred R. (1950), “ Consumer Knowledge: Its Measurement and Extent,” Review of Economics and Statistics,Vol. 32, Iss. 4, pp. 300-314.
    21. Park, Whan C., Bernard J. Jaworski and Deboarh J. MacLnnis (1986), “Strategic Brand Concept-Image Management,” Journal of Marketing, Vol.50, Iss.4 , pp.135-145.
    22. Poist, Richard F. (1996), “Creating Logistics Value: Themes For The Future,” Transportation Journal, Vol. 36, Iss. 1; pp. 51.
    23. Richardson, Paul S., Alan S. Dick and Arun K. Jain (1994), “Extrinsic and Intrinsic Cue Effects on Perceptions of Store Brand Quality,” Journal of Marketing, Vol. 58, Iss. 4; pp. 28.
    24. Roland, Rust T., Christine Moorman and Peter R. Dickson (2002), “Getting Return on Quality: Revenue Expansion, Cost Reduction, or Both? ” Journal of Marketing, Vol. 66, Iss. 4; pp. 7.
    25. Schooler, Robert (1971), “Bias Phenomena Attendant to the Marketing of Foreign Goods in the U.S,” Journal of International Business Studies, Vol. 2, Iss. 1, pp.71-80.
    26. Snoj, Boris and Aleksandra P. Korda and Damijan Mumel. (2004), “The Relationships Among Perceived Quality, Perceived Risk and Perceived Product Value,” The Journal of Product and Brand Management, Vol. 13, Iss. 2/3; pp. 156.
    27. Steenkamp, Jan B. (1990), “Conceptual Model of the Habit of Judging Quality by Price,” Review of Economic Studies, Vol.12, pp.100-105.
    28. Suri, Rajneesh and Kent B. Monroe. (2003), "The Effects of Time Constraints on Consumers’ Judgments of Prices and Products," Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 30, pp. 92-104.
    29. Suvachart, Noppamash, D. (2002), “A Comparative Brand Image Analysis of Domestic Versus Foreign Branded Products in Thailand,” Doctrine Thesis of Business Administration, Nova Southeastern University.
    30. Tellis, Gerard J. and Birger Wernerfelt (1987). “Competitive Price and Quality Under Asymmetric Information,” Marketing Science, Vol. 10, Iss. 3, pp. 240.
    31. Zeithaml, Valarie A. and Amna Kirmani (1983), “Advertising, Perceived Quality, and Brand Image,” In: Aaker, D. and Biel, A. (eds.), Brand Equity and Advertising: Advertising’s Role in Building Strong Brand, pp.143-160. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    32. Zeithaml, Valarie A. (1988), "Consumer Perceptions of Price, Quality, and Value: A Means-End Model and Synthesis of Evidence," Journal of Marketing, Vol. 52, pp. 2-22.









    【網路資料】
    1. World Development Report, World Bank(2003)
    2. 消費者基金會網站(http://www.consumers.org.tw/)
    3. E-ICP東方消費者行銷資料庫
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    企業管理學系
    93355038
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0933550381
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[企業管理學系] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    There are no files associated with this item.



    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback