English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 111316/142225 (78%)
Visitors : 48395777      Online Users : 651
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/94994


    Title: 東京學派的漢學脈絡探略：白鳥庫吉的科學主張及其思想基礎
    Other Titles: The Classic Contexts of Shiratori Kurakichi`s Oriental Historiography: The Origin of Scientific China Research in Japan
    Authors: 石之瑜;葉紘麟
    Shih, Chih-Yu;Yeh, Hong-Lin
    Keywords: 白鳥庫吉;東洋史學;社會科學;漢學;日本
    Shiratori Kurakichi;Oriental historiography;social science;Sinology;Japan
    Date: 2006-09
    Issue Date: 2016-05-09 14:03:35 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 本文透過日本中國學東京學派始祖白鳥庫吉所創東洋史學，討論中國研究科學化的意義。白鳥力主以科學方法研究中國，進而掌握普遍法則，超越歐洲學界只能從西洋看中國的侷限。不過，白鳥的問題意識與他所反對的漢學傳統之間，仍可見各種聯繫，他的身世與師承出自漢學傳統，因此不能擺脫漢學議程上朱子學與反朱子學的互動脈絡；白鳥也分享了同時代中國學者躍躍欲試想與西方競爭的氣氛，所研究的對象更是帝國活動的舞台所在，因此與國學派所思所辯輝映。無論問題意識的來源或從事知識活動的動機，科學與漢學都不是對立的。
    Shiratori Kurakichi’s initiative to establish “Oriental historiography”\\r was the first attempt to apply social science methods to China studies in Japan. He believed that Japan was in a better prepared position than its Western counterpart in their common pursuit of universal laws of behavior. This is because Japan understood both the West and China while the West was restricted by its own historical experiences when approaching China. This paper connects Shiratori’s scholarship to classic Sinology in late medieval Japan by placing his research agenda within the context of debates among different classic schools of thoughts. Apparently, “Oriental historiography” cannot just be universal knowledge because it was responsive to the Western views as well as embedded in the Chinese classics. In brief, science as political knowledge is not independent from China scholars’ own research agenda or their purpose.
    Relation: 問題與研究, 45(5), 1-16
    Issues & studies
    Data Type: article
    Appears in Collections:[問題與研究 TSSCI] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    45-5-1.pdf3813KbAdobe PDF2408View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback