English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 110944/141864 (78%)
Visitors : 47925445      Online Users : 1157
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/95063


    Title: 由英國經驗探討台灣的醫療資源配給
    Other Titles: The Rationing of Healthcare Resources in the UK and Its Implications on Taiwan
    Authors: 李卓倫
    Lee, Jwo-Leun
    Keywords: 配給;醫療資源;衛生政策;醫療體系改革;英國
    Rationing;Healthcare Resources;Health Policy;Healthcare Reform;UK
    Date: 2007-12
    Issue Date: 2016-05-09 14:53:17 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 本文擬由英國的經驗來探討台灣的醫療資源配給問題，期能藉此對台灣現階段的資源配給議題提出具體的建議。本文所指的英國經驗，包括英國政府或民間所實施的實務經驗，以及英國本土學者所進行的理念論戰，因為實務與理論對於台灣的具體政策建議具有同等重要性。 本文分為四個段落，第一個段落先就名詞作界定，並陳述資源配給的層級與型式，以作為討論的基礎。第二段探討資源配給的若干原則，包括以需要為基礎的效率、公平和可行性三個原則的取捨，區分決策層級的配給原則，以及說明配給過程中應由資訊亦或機構取得優先地 位的爭論。第三段介紹英國在過去與近年來的醫療資源配給經驗，以及英國對於醫療資源地理分布的策略內容。第四段則陳述本文對英國在理念論戰與實務經驗兩方面對台灣全民健保的啟示。
    This article aims to explore the experience of rationing of healthcare resources in the UK, and its implications for the healthcare system eform in Taiwan. The UK experience of rationing mentioned in this article includes the practical policy or clinical issues faced by the UK government, as well as the theoretical or conceptual debates among researchers in the UK. It is revealed that the practical and theoretical issues have equivalent impact on the policy implications for healthcare rationing in Taiwan. Four sections are presented. The first describes the definition of rationing, and its levels and types, as the basis of further discussion in this study. The second takes some of the more well-known rationing principles and assesses their merits using three basic criteria: equity, efficiency and practicality. It is also mentioned of how rationing may take place at different levels, and the argument about the priorities of information and institutions. The third section introduces the practical policy experience of rationing in the UK, and the weighted capitation formula for geographical areas. The last section reveals the policy implication for the healthcare reform in Taiwan.
    Relation: 問題與研究, 46(4), 53-86
    Issues & studies
    Data Type: article
    Appears in Collections:[問題與研究 TSSCI] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    46453.pdf1779KbAdobe PDF2303View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback